Author Topic: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner  (Read 60278 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #465 on: March 22, 2022, 01:36:10 PM »
You are deliberately misrepresentating me... again.

I was saying the onus is on him in a legal sense in terms of explaining the phone. People are trying to make out that the duty is on the police to prove he was using that phone and are here making out he has to be given the benefit of the doubt if they can't 100% prove he had it that night. What I went on to say (which you have cut) is that a judge won't see it that way. He will (at some point) be expected to explain why his phone was in Luz and being used if he wants to claim that he wasn't the one using it.

I did NOT say that he "should" defend himself against newspaper gossip and rumours. Which is just the latest of unfounded and unwarranted accusations you've levelled at me. The phone evidence isn't newspaper gossip! In fact it's one of the only pieces of evidence the authorities have officially released. This is an accusation directly from the police, not tabloid rumour.

Yes, it's up to him when he wants to address that question over the phone and his whereabouts, but he shouldn't expect people to have much sympathy for his complaints or an expectation to be given the benefit of the doubt when he is choosing not to do so.
Cart before the horse here, kid. Why haven't they arrested him?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #466 on: March 22, 2022, 02:33:23 PM »
Cart before the horse here, kid. Why haven't they arrested him?

Insufficient evidence?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #467 on: March 22, 2022, 02:38:54 PM »
Insufficient evidence?
He's in prison, they have the luxury of time to build a solid case as their suspect isn't going anywhere. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #468 on: March 22, 2022, 02:40:05 PM »
Do I need to explain to you again why Wolters says he hasn't arrested him. It makes perfect sense. I would wager FF and CB would both like an arrest to go ahead.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #469 on: March 22, 2022, 02:41:48 PM »
He's in prison, they have the luxury of time to build a solid case as their suspect isn't going anywhere.
And there's more... But it's pointless pointing it out if posters can't remember or understand

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #470 on: March 22, 2022, 02:44:05 PM »
He's in prison, they have the luxury of time to build a solid case as their suspect isn't going anywhere.

Add disclosure and double jeopardy for a start

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #471 on: March 22, 2022, 03:37:57 PM »
Insufficient evidence?
We have a winner! He can't, he hasn't met the threshold to permit him / them to even start.
Despite the insistence that there's no rush as he's in the jug, even the most impaired of cognition could deduce that if they had enough on him there would be an almighty clamour to get him in an interview room. HCW holds a press conference when he's going for a piss, so he wouldn't be able to contain himself if he had a breakthrough.

No, it wasn't a rhetorical question, and at least one member answered vicariously, but pretended not to.
This 'evidence'? Not nearly enough. That's pretty damning, and would be embarrassing, but the guy seems oblivious to the ridicule his ineptitude attracts. He's toast. Career killer. Another one for the MM cenotaph; collateral damage. The arse end of the pantomime horse.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.


Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #473 on: March 22, 2022, 03:38:24 PM »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10631921/Madeleine-McCanns-disappearance-Met-Police-set-wind-probe-later-year.html


£13 Million according to the above article ... and article dated 20th March 2022[/b]
What's £3 million between mortal enemies?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #474 on: March 22, 2022, 03:45:27 PM »
We have a winner! He can't, he hasn't met the threshold to permit him / them to even start.
Despite the insistence that there's no rush as he's in the jug, even the most impaired of cognition could deduce that if they had enough on him there would be an almighty clamour to get him in an interview room. HCW holds a press conference when he's going for a piss, so he wouldn't be able to contain himself if he had a breakthrough.

No, it wasn't a rhetorical question, and at least one member answered vicariously, but pretended not to.
This 'evidence'? Not nearly enough. That's pretty damning, and would be embarrassing, but the guy seems oblivious to the ridicule his ineptitude attracts. He's toast. Career killer. Another one for the MM cenotaph; collateral damage. The arse end of the pantomime horse.
I see you signed your post... As arse end of the pantomime horse... I admire your honesty

Offline sadie

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #475 on: March 22, 2022, 04:03:19 PM »
What's £3 million between mortal enemies?

As an elite, peanuts to you, but to us ordinary mortals it's a big deal


As a mathematician, I would be surprised if it didn't mean a good deal to you too.



PS.  I am not your enemy.   I feel sorry for you





Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #476 on: March 22, 2022, 04:04:59 PM »
I see you signed your post... As arse end of the pantomime horse... I admire your honesty
@)(++(*
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #477 on: March 22, 2022, 04:30:22 PM »
Does Brückner tick the boxes in your view?

All except the murderer box. He had/has no previous in this area. He also had no motive.

The Germans have nothing to connect him with Maddie anyway, it's all just bull.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2022, 04:33:21 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #478 on: March 22, 2022, 04:35:28 PM »
I see you signed your post... As arse end of the pantomime horse... I admire your honesty
Not a problem. I have been and continue to be in much more precarious situations.
Incidentally, from experience (Broadway, Catford 1996 - Jack and the Beanstalk / Ipswich Regent 1998 / 99 - Aladdin), the arse end of a pantomime horse requires very little skill or, indeed, any semblance of common human competence, apart from bending over. So well inside your wheelhouse.
Open wide!
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #479 on: March 22, 2022, 04:43:46 PM »
All except the murderer box. He had/has no previous in this area. He also had no motive.

The Germans have nothing to connect him with Maddie anyway, it's all just bull.
*slaps forehead*
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".