Author Topic: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner  (Read 60185 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #555 on: March 23, 2022, 03:48:27 PM »
They're so reticent, they never even bothered trying to question him as a witness. That would the savvy thing to do, instead of blurting it out to the globe that the guy in the jug is also in the frame. And they call the PJ inpet. The frontage!

I agree, it would make sense to try speaking to him prior to putting out that appeal to see what information he might be willing to give/slip up voluntarily.... So, how do you know they didn't bother to do that?

Offline Brietta

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #556 on: March 23, 2022, 03:53:18 PM »
No, he rather presciently foresaw the coming of Patsy Man. He was right again, the good doctor. Get over it, if you can puncture your unequivocal prejudices.

Goncalo Amaral was responsible for Brueckner's name being released into the public domain and if you haven't twigged that one you really know nothing about what goes on in this case.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #557 on: March 23, 2022, 03:58:12 PM »
Goncalo Amaral was responsible for Brueckner's name being released into the public domain and if you haven't twigged that one you really know nothing about what goes on in this case.
Show me, big licks.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #558 on: March 23, 2022, 04:03:46 PM »
I agree, it would make sense to try speaking to him prior to putting out that appeal to see what information he might be willing to give/slip up voluntarily.... So, how do you know they didn't bother to do that?
Good question. HCW admitted himself, as Davel alluded somewhere above, that he essentially didn't want to show his hand and give CB's defence a chance to pre-arm themselves.
In addition, Herr Fulscher, CB's lawyer stated that 'it would be super cold day in hell before he talks', or something like that, but they hadn't tried.
Personally I think, if I'm right, and I'm usually not, that an opportunity was missed.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Brietta

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #559 on: March 23, 2022, 04:08:03 PM »
I agree, it would make sense to try speaking to him prior to putting out that appeal to see what information he might be willing to give/slip up voluntarily.... So, how do you know they didn't bother to do that?

Is it possible that Brueckner was ignorant of the police investigation into Madeleine's case being carried out with him at the centre until Amaral wrong footed the Germans by making sure his name was publicised.

He let it go in the Australian podcast of 2019.  Stupid media thought his referral was to Ney!  So he had to intervene again in 2020 making sure that a guy no-one had ever heard of became his patsy of choice.

He could have been blissfully unaware - why would the Germans be investigating Madeleine's case, after all?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #560 on: March 23, 2022, 04:18:05 PM »
Is it possible that Brueckner was ignorant of the police investigation into Madeleine's case being carried out with him at the centre until Amaral wrong footed the Germans by making sure his name was publicised.

He let it go in the Australian podcast of 2019.  Stupid media thought his referral was to Ney!  So he had to intervene again in 2020 making sure that a guy no-one had ever heard of became his patsy of choice.

He could have been blissfully unaware - why would the Germans be investigating Madeleine's case, after all?
I'm man / woman / non-binary enough to admit that they stumbled upon something incriminating during a different investigation.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #561 on: March 23, 2022, 04:19:04 PM »
And The General thinks Actually care.  What an idiot.  Presuming anyone reads his rubbish.
Jesus, Eleanor, wind it in, girl. It's crawling with Word Police in 'ere.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #562 on: March 23, 2022, 04:22:00 PM »
Good question. HCW admitted himself, as Davel alluded somewhere above, that he essentially didn't want to show his hand and give CB's defence a chance to pre-arm themselves.
In addition, Herr Fulscher, CB's lawyer stated that 'it would be super cold day in hell before he talks', or something like that, but they hadn't tried.
Personally I think, if I'm right, and I'm usually not, that an opportunity was missed.

HCW doesn't want to question him as a suspect, because then he has to show his evidence. Fulscher is talking about the fact that CB won't talk until he is forced to. I was asking, how do you know, that prior to the appeal (and before Fulscher was his lawyer), the police did not approach him in prison to put certain questions to him to see if he was willing to talk on a voluntary basis?

You don't know. You are assuming. I know you are.

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #563 on: March 23, 2022, 04:34:07 PM »
HCW doesn't want to question him as a suspect, because then he has to show his evidence. Fulscher is talking about the fact that CB won't talk until he is forced to. I was asking, how do you know, that prior to the appeal (and before Fulscher was his lawyer), the police did not approach him in prison to put certain questions to him to see if he was willing to talk on a voluntary basis?

You don't know. You are assuming. I know you are.
Well of course I'm assuming. I'm not some soothsaying, mindbender like Clinton Baptiste. I'm a simple bellend with a keyboard. I'm literally making it up as I go along. I'm a tit; a dickhead, as Eleanor so eloquently put it.
But I'm applying some semblance of abstraction. I'm thinking behind what we think we know.
But you were intrigued by the notion, as you responded as if you hadn't considered the concept and broadly concurred. Because there's a kernel of sense in there, amongst the word salad.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #564 on: March 23, 2022, 04:34:15 PM »
You started it, you apparently think Martin Grime is a charlatan, but won't tell him.


Anyway, back on topic.....CB box ticking, totally not libelous, boxes, parameters created arbitrarily by supporters. Change the boxes.
And you think Eddie alerted to cadaver odour..... Lol

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #565 on: March 23, 2022, 04:39:53 PM »
And you think Eddie alerted to cadaver odour..... Lol
I like the rule of thumb. The 80/20 rule. Lex Parsimoniae.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #566 on: March 23, 2022, 04:50:27 PM »
Well of course I'm assuming. I'm not some soothsaying, mindbender like Clinton Baptiste. I'm a simple bellend with a keyboard. I'm literally making it up as I go along. I'm a tit; a dickhead, as Eleanor so eloquently put it.
But I'm applying some semblance of abstraction. I'm thinking behind what we think we know.
But you were intrigued by the notion, as you responded as if you hadn't considered the concept and broadly concurred. Because there's a kernel of sense in there, amongst the word salad.

Well that's about the most accurate post I've seen from you. Congrats.

All except for the bit about me not having previously considered the concept that the police have already tried speaking to him in a "voluntary" manner. I'll leave it at that.

Offline The General

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #567 on: March 23, 2022, 04:55:33 PM »
Well that's about the most accurate post I've seen from you. Congrats.

All except for the bit about me not having previously considered the concept that the police have already tried speaking to him in a "voluntary" manner. I'll leave it at that.
Yeh, no probs, kid.
But I do hope you earned that badge, I'll leave it at that.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #568 on: March 23, 2022, 05:06:52 PM »
I like the rule of thumb. The 80/20 rule. Lex Parsimoniae.

Its quality not quantity... There never was a cadaver in 5 a

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #569 on: March 23, 2022, 05:57:39 PM »
Yeh, no probs, kid.
But I do hope you earned that badge, I'll leave it at that.

A serving or ex soldier has one detail engraved on his or her memory. I still remember my husband's. Any guesses?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0