The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner

[G-Unit]

Six attempts ?    Aw, that is awful.   

Similar things used to happen to me all the time.  Then I wasn't able to enter the forum , sometimes for months on end.

Also long posts that I had spent a long time researching and typing up just vanished and I was continually logged out.
Additionally, I was prevented from logging in again by various devious means.  And funny things happened to what I had typed, like changing the posts meaning entirely.


I suggest that you ensure that you are able to reach at least one other UK Forum supporter so that your voice can be heard on forum, or at the very least they can inform John.


Is it you, Gunit, who is refusing Para2030s posts ?

Please post on topic;
Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner

[Vertigo Swirl]

Please post on topic;
Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner

Does Brückner tick the boxes in your view?

[G-Unit]

Does Brückner tick the boxes in your view?

He ticks the boxes quoted, but what does that signify? That he meets some criteria which some people think are met by those likely to abduct and murder small children. That's enlightening only if the right criteria have been identified.

Does Brueckner, commonly referred to as a paedophile, fit the description of such a person? In my opinion he does not.

[Vertigo Swirl]

He ticks the boxes quoted, but what does that signify? That he meets some criteria which some people think are met by those likely to abduct and murder small children. That's enlightening only if the right criteria have been identified.

Does Brueckner, commonly referred to as a paedophile, fit the description of such a person? In my opinion he does not.

Sorry, you’ve lost me.  He ticks the boxes in your opinion, but also in your opinion he does not tick the boxes. Come again?

[Vertigo Swirl]

He ticks the boxes quoted, but what does that signify? That he meets some criteria which some people think are met by those likely to abduct and murder small children. That's enlightening only if the right criteria have been identified.

Does Brueckner, commonly referred to as a paedophile, fit the description of such a person? In my opinion he does not.

What does ticking the boxes signify?  It signifies that he is a suitable candidate for thorough investigation.  Agree or disagree?

[G-Unit]

What does ticking the boxes signify?  It signifies that he is a suitable candidate for thorough investigation.  Agree or disagree?

To be honest I can't remember what the boxes were. I assume they are a list of things that some people think suggest point to a suspicious person. Imo it is similar to profiling, but I've no idea how useful or successful these things are. Are these boxes used by the police? Do they use the same boxes as people have used here?

[barrier]

To be honest I can't remember what the boxes were. I assume they are a list of things that some people think suggest point to a suspicious person. Imo it is similar to profiling, but I've no idea how useful or successful these things are. Are these boxes used by the police? Do they use the same boxes as people have used here?

If the latest from the brit rags are to believed CB doesn't tick the right box's.

[jassi]

If the latest from the brit rags are to believed CB doesn't tick the right box's.

Or at least not the really important ones like evidence of actual physical involvement with Madeleine.

[Vertigo Swirl]

To be honest I can't remember what the boxes were. I assume they are a list of things that some people think suggest point to a suspicious person. Imo it is similar to profiling, but I've no idea how useful or successful these things are. Are these boxes used by the police? Do they use the same boxes as people have used here?

Have you not been reading this thread, in particular the contributions from Para?  Or are you suffering short term memory loss / selective amnesia?  I suggest you re-read the entire thread, and then let us know if you think (based on the boxes you yourself just now agreed CB ticked) that he should be thoroughly investigated for the abduction / murder of Madeleine McCann.  If not, then why not?  Which boxes does he not tick that means he should never have been investigated?  For example, his surname isn’t McCann, etc.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If the latest from the brit rags are to believed CB doesn't tick the right box's.

Can I have a cite for that please. 

[barrier]

Can I have a cite for that please.

END OF THE ROAD Madeleine McCann inquiry to END after 11 years as fears grow prime suspect WON’T be charged

Brit rags have a look.

[Vertigo Swirl]

END OF THE ROAD Madeleine McCann inquiry to END after 11 years as fears grow prime suspect WON’T be charged

Brit rags have a look.

A cite which states the police don’t think CB ticks all the boxes is what I was after.  You do understand (or perhaps you don’t) that a suspect can tick all the boxes and still not be charged?  Think John Canaan. 

[barrier]

A cite which states the police don’t think CB ticks all the boxes is what I was after.  You do understand (or perhaps you don’t) that a suspect can tick all the boxes and still not be charged?  Think John Canaan.

Canaan is as innocent of lamplugh's murder the same as you and I, so your point is ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Canaan is as innocent of lamplugh's murder the same as you and I, so your point is ?

I would explain but clearly it would go right over your head.

[barrier]

I would explain but clearly it would go right over your head.

You couldn't get past the first capital letter.