The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner

[barrier]

So, if the dogs alerted to CB's personal effects would you take that as evidence of his involvement in Madeleine's murder?  Of course you wouldn't.

How would it be determined the alert belonged to Madeleine ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

How would it be determined the alert belonged to Madeleine ?

Blimey, has the penny dropped then?

[jassi]

How would it be determined the alert belonged to Madeleine ?

That's never previously been the issue, though. It was that the dogs were incredibly unreliable, not that they had detected death odour of someone other than Madeleine in PDL

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's never previously been the issue, though. It was that the dogs were incredibly unreliable, not that they had detected death odour of someone other than Madeleine in PDL

You just don’t get it, no matter how many hundreds of times it’s been discussed.  The dog alerts cannot be relied on as evidence that a corpse once lay in situ, never mind tell you whose corpse it was, unless there is some corroborating evidence .  Will you and your mates ever be able to grasp this simple fact?

[Mr Gray]

That's never previously been the issue, though. It was that the dogs were incredibly unreliable, not that they had detected death odour of someone other than Madeleine in PDL

I dont think the dogs are unreliable at all.. They are trained to find human remains and I would think they are very good at it. Problem for Eddie was I don't think there were any to find. In fact if Maddie was abducted there absolutely wasn't... So do you think SY and the Germans are ignoring them.

[G-Unit]

You just don’t get it, no matter how many hundreds of times it’s been discussed.  The dog alerts cannot be relied on as evidence that a corpse once lay in situ, never mind tell you whose corpse it was, unless there is some corroborating evidence .  Will you and your mates ever be able to grasp this simple fact?

Some people think an open window and shutter are evidence of an abduction and are unable to grasp the fact that they aren't.

[Brietta]

Some people think an open window and shutter are evidence of an abduction and are unable to grasp the fact that they aren't.

Which people are those?

If they are members here and have posted what you allege - should be easy enough to provide a cite.

As we know it was alleged by Brueckner's criminal associates that he was known as a climber who entered properties via windows to burgle them.
Do you suggest the open window in 5A represents another of the boxes Brueckner ticks.

[Mr Gray]

Some people think an open window and shutter are evidence of an abduction and are unable to grasp the fact that they aren't.

Yes they are.. Kate statement is evidence.. You are 100% wrong

[G-Unit]

Yes they are.. Kate statement is evidence.. You are 100% wrong

Her statement is evidence of an open window and shutters, not evidence of who opened them and why.

[Mr Gray]

Her statement is evidence of an open window and shutters, not evidence of who opened them and why.

And an open window is evidence of abduction.. You are still 100% wrong

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some people think an open window and shutter are evidence of an abduction and are unable to grasp the fact that they aren't.

Explain why not then.

[Mr Gray]

Some people think an open window and shutter are evidence of an abduction and are unable to grasp the fact that they aren't.

You cannot seem to grasp that this is not fact but your opinion

[Vertigo Swirl]

Her statement is evidence of an open window and shutters, not evidence of who opened them and why.

Was the open zip on Cleo Smith’s tent evidence the someone entered the tent and took her?  If not please explain why it was not and why the police clearly thought it was.

[Mr Gray]

D

[Vertigo Swirl]

“ Evidence is relevant if it logically goes to proving or disproving some fact at issue in the prosecution. It is admissible if it relates to the facts in issue, or to circumstances that make those facts probable or improbable, and has been properly obtained.27 Aug 2021”

Now explain why various statements concerning the open window and shutter are not evidence?