Author Topic: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner  (Read 60306 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #660 on: March 25, 2022, 09:53:00 AM »
Bolded bit, then you can except Wolters maybe talking complete bull.
I have no doubt he hasn't told us everything.  You can interpret that as "complete bull" if you want - your prerogative.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #661 on: March 25, 2022, 03:35:19 PM »
The open window claim isn't evidence as it is uncorroborated. In fact when Matt did his outside check the window wasn't open so take from that what you may.

Uncorroborated evidence is accepted in court as evidence... A rape case is a good example
Martin Smith id of Gerry is uncorroborated by any other in the group.. So are you saying his statement is not evidence..
Kates witness statement is evidence that could be presented to a jury

Offline sadie

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #662 on: March 25, 2022, 04:11:16 PM »
The point is that sceptics are totally mistaken.. Who would have guessed... In saying 15 million has been spent looking for MM.
It hasn't... 15 mill has been spent looking for the abductor and murderer of MM.. And it looks like its paid off.
Or should we just let child murderers get away with it. Thank god SY and the Germans have stuck with it when the pathetic PJ failed

13 million, Davel.

See how "The Generals" misinforation has caught on.  He said £15 million and it was wrong.


£13 million.  NOT £15 million

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #663 on: March 25, 2022, 05:18:59 PM »
So evidence is only evidence if there is corroboration, is that what you’re saying?  Using your rules what evidence is there that the McCanns disposed of their daughter’s body?
Seeing as how you have chosen not to reply to this question I can only deduce that there is none.  Odd that you therefore lean towards this theory over all others, no?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #664 on: March 25, 2022, 06:36:41 PM »
Seeing as how you have chosen not to reply to this question I can only deduce that there is none.  Odd that you therefore lean towards this theory over all others, no?

We were dicusssing uncorroborated evidence. Where's the uncorroboborated evidence of this; I've not seen any in the files.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline sadie

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #665 on: March 25, 2022, 06:46:05 PM »
Me personally, no. I have the utmost respect for any man or woman who volunteers for her Majesty's Service, even you. But since displaying the badge offends you, or makes you think you can use it against me, I'll remove it. It was meant in honour and if I had any respect for you on a personal level, I'd tell you my story. Maybe another time.

Hey, Ms Para, you don't honestly think The General is a real General, do you?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #666 on: March 25, 2022, 06:47:43 PM »
We were dicusssing uncorroborated evidence. Where's the uncorroboborated evidence of this; I've not seen any in the files.
I don’t know what you mean.  This is the question I have asked and which you have left unanswered.

“So evidence is only evidence if there is corroboration, is that what you’re saying?  Using your rules what evidence is there that the McCanns disposed of their daughter’s body?”
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline John

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #667 on: March 25, 2022, 07:00:15 PM »
Uncorroborated evidence is accepted in court as evidence... A rape case is a good example
Martin Smith id of Gerry is uncorroborated by any other in the group.. So are you saying his statement is not evidence..
Kates witness statement is evidence that could be presented to a jury

Martin Smith's evidence of seeing an as yet unidentified man carrying a child the night Madeleine disappeared was corroborated by the entire family. That is the important fact.

Uncorroborated evidence has little evidential value in court because it could well be made up or pure fiction intended to mislead.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #668 on: March 25, 2022, 07:05:54 PM »
Martin Smith's evidence of seeing an as yet unidentified man carrying a child the night Madeleine disappeared was corroborated by the entire family. That is the important fact.

Uncorroborated evidence has little evidential value in court because it could well be made up or pure fiction intended to mislead.
As could “corroborated “ evidence.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #669 on: March 25, 2022, 07:07:40 PM »
Martin Smith's evidence of seeing an as yet unidentified man carrying a child the night Madeleine disappeared was corroborated by the entire family. That is the important fact.

Uncorroborated evidence has little evidential value in court because it could well be made up or pure fiction intended to mislead.

Martin Smith saw a man.. That's corroborated

He said 60 to 80% Gerry mccann... Not corroborated

I do agree with you his claim has little value

I disagree re uncorroborated evidence in general. Its admissible in court and the jury decides its value

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #670 on: March 25, 2022, 08:10:55 PM »
I don’t know what you mean.  This is the question I have asked and which you have left unanswered.

“So evidence is only evidence if there is corroboration, is that what you’re saying?  Using your rules what evidence is there that the McCanns disposed of their daughter’s body?”

There is no such evidence.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #671 on: March 25, 2022, 08:27:07 PM »
There is no such evidence.
If there is no evidence that the McCanns disposed of their child’s body then why on earth do you believe that they did?  And please don’t insult my intelligence by pretending that you don’t.  You have made it clear that you think Amaral solved the case in 2007. How did he do that if there is no evidence that the McCanns committed any crime?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #672 on: March 25, 2022, 09:35:46 PM »
If there is no evidence that the McCanns disposed of their child’s body then why on earth do you believe that they did?  And please don’t insult my intelligence by pretending that you don’t.  You have made it clear that you think Amaral solved the case in 2007. How did he do that if there is no evidence that the McCanns committed any crime?

I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann. How you interpret my posts is not how I do so, which makes it impossible to answer your questions.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #673 on: March 25, 2022, 10:45:25 PM »
I don't know what happened to Madeleine McCann. How you interpret my posts is not how I do so, which makes it impossible to answer your questions.
How very convenient for you.  Do you think Amaral solved the case in 2007 - yes or no? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #674 on: March 25, 2022, 10:53:17 PM »
How very convenient for you.  Do you think Amaral solved the case in 2007 - yes or no?

Theories have been advanced by many people over the years, but the case still isn't solved.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0