Anti facebook groups etc

[Wonderfulspam]

Again I think you may have hit the nail on the head despite posting nonsense worthy of whatever "Anti facebook groups etc" or whatever internet platform you may prefer.

If memory serves me well Brueckner's lawyer may well be working on a defence for two rapes on two unknown women, one an older woman and one much younger.
It seems the BKA may have used the system of gathering the evidence for these vile offenses using exactly the methods you hold up to ridicule.

Well, you can think that, & I can laugh about it you see, because Wolters concrete, irrefutable, 100% evidence Brueckner murdered Maddie, which you find utterly convincing without having seen it,  isn't sufficient to bring Brueckner to justice anytime soon, much to your disappointment I'm sure.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yet you do , but don't have an issue with the BKA declaring the same .

I’m reserving judgement on the BKA and HCW in particular who claims to have certain evidence that would lead us to be convinced of CB’s involvement so I’m giving Wolters the benefit of the doubt, particularly as he hasn’t been moved sideways or sacked for anything he has so far revealed publicly.  The difference is we know for a fact Amaral had nothing and yet made a small personal fortune out of pretending that he did.

[Wonderfulspam]

Are you referring to the burglars interviewed in 2014?

Just as in Brueckner's case the PJ studiously ignored the phone ping evidence available to them in 2007.

....and pray tell, what does Brueckner's phone ping evidence prove exactly?

That he recieved a half hour phone call?

Well that's not much use really is it.

[Wonderfulspam]

I’m reserving judgement on the BKA and HCW in particular who claims to have certain evidence that would lead us to be convinced of CB’s involvement so I’m giving Wolters the benefit of the doubt, particularly as he hasn’t been moved sideways or sacked for anything he has so far revealed publicly.  The difference is we know for a fact Amaral had nothing and yet made a small personal fortune out of pretending that he did.

Well, there's simply no good reason to doubt Wolters is there.

Other than the fact he can't prove anything I suppose. In My Opinion.

[Brietta]

....and pray tell, what does Brueckner's phone ping evidence prove exactly?

That he recieved a half hour phone call?

Well that's not much use really is it.

What is it you imagine the ping from Corrie McKeague's phone signifies again.

[Wonderfulspam]

What is it you imagine the ping from Corrie McKeague's phone signifies again.

That it was within a mast radius & connected to a mast?

I'm not sure what your point is really.

If you're suggesting Brueckners phone pinging a mast is evidence he was close to the apartment, that would depend on the mast radius really wouldn't it, & even then, the call was 7:30 to 8:00.

Maddie wasn't 'abducted' until after 9:00, so Brueckner could have been an hour away by then.

If he wasn't, I wonder what Brueckner got up to for that extra hour?

Any ideas?  Maybe Wolters knows & we'll find out soon.

[Rossb]

That it was within a mast radius & connected to a mast?

I'm not sure what your point is really.

If you're suggesting Brueckners phone pinging a mast is evidence he was close to the apartment, that would depend on the mast radius really wouldn't it, & even then, the call was 7:30 to 8:00.

Maddie wasn't 'abducted' until after 9:00, so Brueckner could have been an hour away by then.

If he wasn't, I wonder what Brueckner got up to for that extra hour?

Any ideas?  Maybe Wolters knows & we'll find out soon.

Maybe amaral may know soon!

[Lace]

That it was within a mast radius & connected to a mast?

I'm not sure what your point is really.

If you're suggesting Brueckners phone pinging a mast is evidence he was close to the apartment, that would depend on the mast radius really wouldn't it, & even then, the call was 7:30 to 8:00.

Maddie wasn't 'abducted' until after 9:00, so Brueckner could have been an hour away by then.

If he wasn't, I wonder what Brueckner got up to for that extra hour?

Any ideas?  Maybe Wolters knows & we'll find out soon.

Where did CB go on the night of the 3rd of May.   He went somewhere has he said where he went?

[Wonderfulspam]

Where did CB go on the night of the 3rd of May.   He went somewhere has he said where he went?

I don't know, I keep writing to him, sending him fan mail & scented letters, but he hasn't replied yet.

Maybe he was out abducting & murdering Maddie, or maybe he just wasn't, & we have to presume he wasn't, because that's what the presumption of innocence requires, until Wolters can prove the opposite in a court of law, if he actually can that is.

[Eleanor]

Where did CB go on the night of the 3rd of May.   He went somewhere has he said where he went?

Unfortunately his Alibi let him down because she can't remember.

[Wonderfulspam]

Unfortunately his Alibi let him down because she can't remember.

Well, it doesn't seem to have made any difference does it?

I mean, is Brueckner being charged with abducting & murdering Maddie anytime soon, as a result of this uncertain alibi, do you happen to know?

[sadie]

Germany is the country that is claiming their prime suspect killed Madeleine without dna evidence , forensics or a body ,

As far as YOU know.  As far as we all know

But You / we dont know everything about the case , do we?

[barrier]

As far as YOU know.  As far as we all know

But You / we dont know everything about the case , do we?

Its the prosecutor's words from Germany not mine.

[sadie]

Its the prosecutor's words from Germany not mine.

As far as we know, but they are not obliged to share everything with us.

[barrier]

As far as we know, but they are not obliged to share everything with us.

Indeed they are not, but what he has shared are the reasons for no advancement after investigating CB for 5 yrs two of them as prime suspect, Wolters is on record on tv saying they cannot put CB in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 also in the very same programme he says they have no forensics into the death of Madeleine.

Can some one enlighten the reader where before , a person has been charged and found guilty, without a body, without forensic evidence and the prime suspect can't be placed at or near a scene of alleged abduction.

There is no search for Madeleine imo , there might be a search for incriminating evidence to lead to a prosecution.