Anti facebook groups etc

[Mr Gray]

As I understand it a judge looks at all the evidence and then decides if charges will follow...or not.

I find Wolters very thorough.....I cant see him submitting the evidence unless its comprehensive

[Rossb]

Ok then, name a case where there has been no body, no forensics and the alleged perpetrator can not be placed in the vicinity of where an alleged victim disappeared from ? and it led to a successful prosecution ?

Their are certain circumstantial evidences against him and some to the public unknown. He has admitted being in the area that night. But not one so called alibi has accounted or made public about his whereabouts.

[Wonderfulspam]

Their are certain circumstantial evidences against him and some to the public unknown. He has admitted being in the area that night. But not one so called alibi has accounted or made public about his whereabouts.

Any witnesses say he was busy abducting Maddie on the night of may 3rd?

[jassi]

Their are certain circumstantial evidences against him and some to the public unknown. He has admitted being in the area that night. But not one so called alibi has accounted or made public about his whereabouts.

I suppose that works both ways as no one has come forward to say that they saw him in the area, either - as far as we know.
Of course he doesn't really need an alibi, though one might eventually prove helpful, as he hasn't been officially accused of anything that requires one - again as far as we know.

[Rossb]

I suppose that works both ways as no one has come forward to say that they saw him in the area, either - as far as we know.
Of course he doesn't really need an alibi, though one might eventually prove helpful, as he hasn't been officially accused of anything that requires one - again as far as we know.

Not really at this time, but its been said twice he was in area, now i cant remember if a while back he told someone he was not in portugal that night. I think its a chess game he is playing woth the press. He is not obliged until charged to speak to officers. Althpugh he made no comment as an arguido following more than likely his rights from solicitor as did the mccanns

[jassi]

Not really at this time, but its been said twice he was in area, now i cant remember if a while back he told someone he was not in portugal that night. I think its a chess game he is playing woth the press. He is not obliged until charged to speak to officers. Althpugh he made no comment as an arguido following more than likely his rights from solicitor as did the mccanns

Problem is we don't know how reliable something printed in the media actually is. Some stuff is more reliable than other stuff.

What does'in the area' actually mean ?
Anyone with a vehicle within a 50 km  radius  of PDLmight be said to be within the area

[Rossb]

Problem is we don't know how reliable something printed in the media actually is. Some stuff is more reliable than other stuff.

What does'in the area' actually mean ?
Anyone with a vehicle within a 50 km  radius  of PDLmight be said to be within the area

Being in area, im not saying that is definitive, but their must be more. Will hold hands up if not released when charged or convicted.

[Rossb]

Problem is we don't know how reliable something printed in the media actually is. Some stuff is more reliable than other stuff.

What does'in the area' actually mean ?
Anyone with a vehicle within a 50 km  radius  of PDLmight be said to be within the area

I also just cant see why they would focus vision on this person CB without reason.

[jassi]

Being in area, im not saying that is definitive, but their must be more. Will hold hands up if not released when charged or convicted.

I'm afraid that not being charged doesn't exclude him, or indeed anyone else. It merely means that police haven't                                                                                                                                     found sufficient evidence to follow through.

[Wonderfulspam]

I also just cant see why they would focus vision on this person CB without reason.

Because he lived & worked in the area, broke into apartments & robbed, raped a granny & some young sort, molested kids, went around telling his mates he knew all about the McCann case, told a paedo in a chat room that he murdered Maddie, destroying the evidence, & the Cops don't know where he was on May 3rd.

[Rossb]

I'm afraid that not being charged doesn't exclude him, or indeed anyone else. It merely means that police haven't                                                                                                                                     found sufficient evidence to follow through.

You can npt release information you have especially with a high profile case.

[jassi]

I also just cant see why they would focus vision on this person CB without reason.

The Germans are only focused on Brueckner because of some statement made to British police by a criminal associate.  There are no other declared suspects.

They are desperate to prosecute him for something, hence the  unrelated alleged forthcoming charges. I can see no other reason why they should want to act as world police force.

Clearly they are piecing together some  evidential links and hope to persuade judges of their validity.

IMO

[jassi]

You can npt release information you have especially with a high profile case.

Agreed, so a failure to gain a conviction will leave the case in limbo.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The Germans are only focused on Brueckner because of some statement made to British police by a criminal associate.  There are no other declared suspects.

They are desperate to prosecute him for something, hence the  unrelated alleged forthcoming charges. I can see no other reason why they should want to act as world police force.

Clearly they are piecing together some  evidential links and hope to persuade judges of their validity.

IMO

Why?  Just taken against him for no good reason?

[Eleanor]

Why?  Just taken against him for no good reason?

Of course.  What else could it be?