Anti facebook groups etc

[Eleanor]

If you are in possession of facts, you have to be able to show your sources. Thankfully someone was able to help you with that.

How come you weren't able?

[Wonderfulspam]

Portugal has always had access to any evidence.  But chose not to pursue it until the last minute.  If in fact they are doing so now.

What a disgraceful shower.

Even Wolters concrete evidence, when he hasn't shared it with the MET?

Or the McCanns either for that matter, incase that jeopardises the case in some way, which nobody is able to explain how it actually could.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you are in possession of facts, you have to be able to show your sources. Thankfully someone was able to help you with that.

At the top of page 32 you were asked for a cite which you have so far failed to provide.

[Wonderfulspam]

At the top of page 32 you were asked for a cite which you have so far failed to provide.

This is how well the case against Brueckner is going.

[Eleanor]

Cite please... Or are you making things up

Gunit is hardly likely to provide a Cite that will prove that she is wrong and make her look foolish.

[Wonderfulspam]

Gunit is hardly likely to provide a Cite that will prove that she is wrong and make her look foolish.

Again, this is how well the case against Brueckner is going. Nothing to talk about but petty arguing over cites instead.

Oh well, there's always tomorrow isn't there.
Maybe Wolters will be able to come up with something tangible then.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Gunit is hardly likely to provide a Cite that will prove that she is wrong and make her look foolish.

Well she looks like a hypocrite instead, hey ho.

[Wonderfulspam]

Well she looks like a hypocrite instead, hey ho.

She could look like a total numpty for believing Wolters, so it could be worse couldn't it.

[Eleanor]

Well she looks like a hypocrite instead, hey ho.

It don't half make you wonder.

[barrier]

But only for one suspect.  The SOL is a personal thing and cannot be extended to everyone once that date has passed.

 Seems strange the SOL is not for the crime nor for the victim then, Sadie asked earlier if CB is found to have not been involved then is it game over ?

[barrier]

Personally, I don't understand how it is no longer possible to prosecute someone for Murder in Portugal after only fifteen years.

And why did Portugal make Brueckner an Arguido only at the last minute?  This stinks.

You would think being in the EU would have meant some kind of correlation in the justice systems.

[Wonderfulspam]

Seems strange the SOL is not for the crime nor for the victim then, Sadie asked earlier if CB is found to have not been involved then is it game over ?

Well, it can only be him, can't it.  Brueckner murdered Maddie & there's concrete evidence which proves as much, Wolters said so.

The MET don't seem to agree though, the McCanns don't seem convinced either, Brueckner is that confident he isn't the murderer that he's been ripping the piss out of the prosecutor with cartoon drawings & challenging him to put up or shut up, but it's probably not important.

[Brietta]

You would think being in the EU would have meant some kind of correlation in the justice systems.

Why would you think that?  Our Scottish laws differ from those of the other countries which make up the Union.

[Eleanor]

You would think being in the EU would have meant some kind of correlation in the justice systems.

Each EU Country is subject to it's own Rules.  I don't know what they are and at the moment I am not interested.  I will become so if and when I need to.

[Mr Gray]

Seems strange the SOL is not for the crime nor for the victim then, Sadie asked earlier if CB is found to have not been involved then is it game over ?

The SOL is for the crime it has not been extended purely for CB. CB was made an arguido before the expiration of the SOL...thats why he ...and only he...can be charged with murder in portugal. As I pointed out correctly...no one else can be made an arguido for murder in this case