Author Topic: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions  (Read 13761 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2013, 10:36:06 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2013, 10:38:29 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Cite?

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #17 on: April 11, 2013, 10:39:10 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Back on topic.  Kate McCann was never even arrested, never mind charged or convicted of anything.

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #18 on: April 11, 2013, 10:43:12 PM »
Oh so it's ok for debunker, the tedious twerp to post "meaningless drivel" at every opportunity but not for anyone to point out his shortcomings?

Like I care about credibility!  I can't stand McCann sycophants and I can't stand rabid [ censored word]. I didn't realise it was a popularity contest!

This is a civil and intelligent forum.  Calling someone a "tedious twerp"  or "tiresome pratt" and other insults does your credibility no favours.

Yet responding "meaningless drivel" to every post is making debunker forummer of the year, no doubt.

Back on topic.  Kate McCann wasn't even arrested.... never mind charged with anything. 

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2013, 10:45:26 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Back on topic.  Kate McCann was never even arrested, never mind charged or convicted of anything.

I started this thread Rachel  ...  and it's  'topic'  is the fact that Kate McCann was only interviewed twice by the police

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2013, 10:47:25 PM »
If, as some claim, the PJ has "not quite enough evidence to make it stick" was Kate (or Gerry) McCann not even formally arrested by the PJ?

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #21 on: April 11, 2013, 10:50:08 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Back on topic.  Kate McCann was never even arrested, never mind charged or convicted of anything.


I started this thread Rachel  ...  and it's  'topic'  is the fact that Kate McCann was only interviewed twice by the police

Fair enough..,. and my countermand to your "topic" is that despite these 2 interviews she wasn't even arrested, never mind charged.  PS) are you going to anwer the question that I have posed several times on the Leonor Cipriano torture thread?
« Last Edit: April 11, 2013, 10:52:10 PM by Rachel Granada »

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #22 on: April 11, 2013, 10:50:20 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Cite?

Kate McCann was due to be interviewd by the police on the 11th of May   ...  she did not attend

Instead,  that day,  she held a meeting with a Barrister and paralegal from Leicester

In fact,  that weekend she held a flurry of meetings with lawyers

Speaking with the police though ...  about her child who had only been missing for a week  ...  that,  she wasn't  up to   

Offline Admin

Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #23 on: April 11, 2013, 11:05:06 PM »
Language please ladies and gentlemen.  Remember abusive posts will be removed.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #24 on: April 11, 2013, 11:08:37 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Cite?

Kate McCann was due to be interviewd by the police on the 11th of May   ...  she did not attend

Instead,  that day,  she held a meeting with a Barrister and paralegal from Leicester

In fact,  that weekend she held a flurry of meetings with lawyers

Speaking with the police though ...  about her child who had only been missing for a week  ...  that,  she wasn't  up to

What is the provenance of the claim Kate skipped an interview she should have attended?

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #25 on: April 11, 2013, 11:22:03 PM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Cite?

Kate McCann was due to be interviewd by the police on the 11th of May   ...  she did not attend

Instead,  that day,  she held a meeting with a Barrister and paralegal from Leicester

In fact,  that weekend she held a flurry of meetings with lawyers

Speaking with the police though ...  about her child who had only been missing for a week  ...  that,  she wasn't  up to

What is the provenance of the claim Kate skipped an interview she should have attended?

Her book

pages 123/124

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2013, 11:48:39 PM »
If that is so "incriminating" then why were they never even arrested, never mind charged or convicted of anything?

Because the police don't charge until they have enough evidence to secure a conviction, despite what some people on here choose to believe.  They haven't been charged.  The word "yet" may well feature somewhere prominently in that statement if it was to be more accurate, however.

Exactly.  They haven't been charged... and I believe in innocent until proven guilty.  So do you think that the PJ will glean further evidence, C Edwards?

Probably not, no.  The chance has probably been lost now.  Had the McCanns and their friends been forced to do the reconstruction as requested by the police, I think they would have managed to prove the timelines were impossible to recreate as a starting point and that may have been the crucial starting point.  That will almost certainly not happen now and the chances are there will only be progress in this case now if someone in the know talks.  That's unlikely to happen also.

It's 95% certain to me, if not more, that the McCanns will never be charged with anything and yet I live in hope. :-)
I agree with this, though I don't think the reconstruction would have proved the McCann were or weren't involved. But it likely had revealed what couldn't have happened, a healthy point for the myth topic.
It was cruel from the Attorney General to suggest that, because of their friends' refusal to reconstruct, the McCanns lost the opportunity to prove their innocence, but it was true. They'll be suspected up to the end of their life and probably their twins will have a doubt when they start surfing on the Web. I think it's terrible.

Offline John

Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #27 on: April 12, 2013, 03:51:23 AM »
Reconstructions are usually conducted using police officers.  Why did the Portuguese police not do this if a reconstruction was so important?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #28 on: April 12, 2013, 06:44:00 AM »
Back on topic 

Is no-one surprised that as early as the 11th of May,  ( just a week after Madeleine's disappearance )   Kate McCann was  already  avoiding police questions ?

Cite?



Kate McCann was due to be interviewd by the police on the 11th of May   ...  she did not attend

Instead,  that day,  she held a meeting with a Barrister and paralegal from Leicester


In fact,  that weekend she held a flurry of meetings with lawyers

Speaking with the police though ...  about her child who had only been missing for a week  ...  that,  she wasn't  up to


What is the provenance of the claim Kate skipped an interview she should have attended?

Her book


pages 123/124

Full quote please for those without access to the book.

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Kate was interviewed by the police on just two occasions
« Reply #29 on: April 12, 2013, 06:45:11 AM »
If, as some claim, the PJ has "not quite enough evidence to make it stick" was Kate (or Gerry) McCann not even formally arrested by the PJ?

Didn't the prosecutor find "no indications of a crime"