Madeleine McCann's parents lose libel case with the European Court of Human Rights

[G-Unit]

In your opinion....I don't think justice has been done. I don't think it's just to accuse people of a crime based on lies

You can rehash the case as much as you like, the fact remains that Amaral and the state of Portugal have been exonerated of wrongdoing whatever you think.

[Mr Gray]

You can rehash the case as much as you like, the fact remains that Amaral and the state of Portugal have been exonerated of wrongdoing whatever you think.

I understand the judgement.. It means I can claim CB is guilty based on the police statements

[Vertigo Swirl]

I understand the judgement.. It means I can claim CB is guilty based on the police statements

Yes you can, and HCW can write a best selling book to that effect just as soon as he resigns or is sacked.  That’s only fair.

[Angelo222]

I understand the judgement.. It means I can claim CB is guilty based on the police statements

Absolute rubbish as usual 

[Eleanor]

Yes you can, and HCW can write a best selling book to that effect just as soon as he resigns or is sacked.  That’s only fair.

And Brueckner wouldn't stand a hope in hell's chance at The ECHR.

[Mr Gray]

Absolute rubbish as usual 

I can guarantee you have not read and understood the judgement...thats precisely what the ECHR have said...but it might be a bit over your head

[G-Unit]

I can guarantee you have not read and understood the judgement...thats precisely what the ECHR have said...but it might be a bit over your head

The only thing which is guaranteed, imo, is the complete lack of understanding you display when it comes to legal matters.

[Mr Gray]

The only thing which is guaranteed, imo, is the complete lack of understanding you display when it comes to legal matters.

then you are a fool...imo

facts,...in order for freedom of speech to override defamation is if it has a factual basis,...the ECHR look at the veracity of the claims....if you read the judgement they saw the claims made having a factual basis...when they were based merely on the opinion of the PJ...can you dispute any of this...

Therefore based on that if the Germans regard CB as guilty then that should also be looked at as fact

can you provide a counter argument...the answer is no...you cant

[G-Unit]

then you are a fool...imo

facts,...in order for freedom of speech to override defamation is if it has a factual basis,...the ECHR look at the veracity of the claims....if you read the judgement they saw the claims made having a factual basis...when they were based merely on the opinion of the PJ...can you dispute any of this...

Therefore based on that if the Germans regard CB as guilty then that should also be looked at as fact

can you provide a counter argument...the answer is no...you cant

My my my. Are you adding seven ECHR judges to the list of people who don't know as much as you do? The fool is plain to see, and it's not me.

[Mr Gray]

My my my. Are you adding seven ECHR judges to the list of people who don't know as much as you do? The fool is plain to see, and it's not me.

the fool is you..

first because you cannot answer the points ive raised..

second because I havent criticised the judges.


Having read the judgement its clear the McCanns challenged the SC decision on the basis of being cleared by the archiving report...the judgement discussed this at length...they should have challenged the veracity of the claims which were accepted without question by the ECHR

[jassi]

the fool is you..

first because you cannot answer the points ive raised..

second because I havent criticised the judges.


Having read the judgement its clear the McCanns challenged the SC decision on the basis of being cleared by the archiving report...the judgement discussed this at length...they should have challenged the veracity of the claims which were accepted without question by the ECHR

Never mind. You'll get over your disappointment in time.

[Mr Gray]

seems not one poster is able to offer any counter argument....as expected

[jassi]

There is no argument.
The ECHR decision is final.
McCann lost.

[Wonderfulspam]

seems not one poster is able to offer any counter argument....as expected

Mate, it's over. Your side lost. Go & walk the dog or have a lie down or something.
Come back when you get a win after Brueckner is charged.

[Wonderfulspam]

There is no argument.
The ECHR decision is final.
McCann lost.

Ah but they were confused about facts. Davel should start a thread & list each individual point of fact that was wrong. Share it with the McCanns lawyers, whom by all accounts were useless.