Author Topic: Madeleine McCann's parents lose libel case with the European Court of Human Rights  (Read 45661 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Unless you are a mastermind and guilty to go down that route. However its also humanistic to protect your status of innocence. Hypothetically i would do the same. Ppl do tend to get mad when i cud imagine if accused of covering up ur daughters death, lucky they were doctors and not from a council estate eh? You never know what violence these stereotyped council estate nutters could do.
I do.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Wonderfulspam

In a statement issued through their lawyers, they said: "We are naturally disappointed with decision of the European Court of Human Rights announced today.

"However, much has changed since we started legal proceedings 13 years ago against Mr Amaral, his publisher and broadcaster.

"We took action for one and only one reason: Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine.

"If the public believed that we were involved in her disappearance, then people would not be alert for possible clues and may not report relevant information to the relevant law enforcement agencies.

"The focus is now rightly on the search for Madeleine and her abductor(s). We are grateful for the ongoing work by the British, German and Portuguese police. We hope that, with the help of the public, hard work and diligence we can eventually find those responsible for Madeleine's disappearance and bring them to justice."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/20/madeleine-mccann-kate-gerry-mccann-lose-latest-stage-libel-battle/
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

In a statement issued through their lawyers, they said: "We are naturally disappointed with decision of the European Court of Human Rights announced today.

"However, much has changed since we started legal proceedings 13 years ago against Mr Amaral, his publisher and broadcaster.

"We took action for one and only one reason: Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine.

"If the public believed that we were involved in her disappearance, then people would not be alert for possible clues and may not report relevant information to the relevant law enforcement agencies.

"The focus is now rightly on the search for Madeleine and her abductor(s). We are grateful for the ongoing work by the British, German and Portuguese police. We hope that, with the help of the public, hard work and diligence we can eventually find those responsible for Madeleine's disappearance and bring them to justice."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/20/madeleine-mccann-kate-gerry-mccann-lose-latest-stage-libel-battle/

"We took action for one and only one reason: Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine.

"If the public believed that we were involved in her disappearance, then people would not be alert for possible clues and may not report relevant information to the relevant law enforcement agencies.
...........

Well, Wolters has messed that up for them hasn't he.

I mean, since he stated that Maddie is dead & Brueckner murdered her, I haven't bothered looking for her at all.
I did find a £2 coin whilst searching for the remote down the back of the sofa the other day though.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Makes one wonder exactly what has to be said or done in order to be considered defamatory.

We now know what isn't defamatory though.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline The General

"We took action for one and only one reason: Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine.

"If the public believed that we were involved in her disappearance, then people would not be alert for possible clues and may not report relevant information to the relevant law enforcement agencies.
...........

Well, Wolters has messed that up for them hasn't he.

I mean, since he stated that Maddie is dead & Brueckner murdered her, I haven't bothered looking for her at all.
I did find a £2 coin whilst searching for the remote down the back of the sofa the other day though.
The entire German nation stopped searching June '20.
Nobody noticed.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Is nobody concerned?   The black triangle only shows on pages 1 and 2 of this topic.   In other words where the ECHR translation shows.
It's just an expired certificate or some other minor issue.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2022, 01:08:08 PM by Brietta »
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Is nobody concerned?   The black triangle only shows on pages 1 and 2 of this topic.   In other words where the ECHR translation shows.
Sadie, the McCanns lost, it’s on the BBC website.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

We now know what isn't defamatory though.
I guess as soon as HCW is sacked he can write a bestselling book claiming CB dunnit even if the investigation  into the latter is dropped.  That’s his pension fund sorted anyway. 
« Last Edit: September 20, 2022, 12:59:16 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

I guess as soon as HCW is sacked he can write a bestselling book claiming CB dunnit even if the charges against the latter are dropped.  That’s his pension fund sorted anyway.

You think Brueckner will ever be charged?
Even Wolters can't see that happening.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

In a statement issued through their lawyers, they said: "We are naturally disappointed with decision of the European Court of Human Rights announced today.

"However, much has changed since we started legal proceedings 13 years ago against Mr Amaral, his publisher and broadcaster.

"We took action for one and only one reason: Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine.

"If the public believed that we were involved in her disappearance, then people would not be alert for possible clues and may not report relevant information to the relevant law enforcement agencies.

"The focus is now rightly on the search for Madeleine and her abductor(s). We are grateful for the ongoing work by the British, German and Portuguese police. We hope that, with the help of the public, hard work and diligence we can eventually find those responsible for Madeleine's disappearance and bring them to justice."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/20/madeleine-mccann-kate-gerry-mccann-lose-latest-stage-libel-battle/

The McCann's unfounded claim that Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine may explain their initial actions. How do they justify continuing after that claim was dismissed by the court of the first instant I wonder?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

The McCann's unfounded claim that Mr Amaral's unfounded claims were having a detrimental impact on the search for Madeleine may explain their initial actions. How do they justify continuing after that claim was dismissed by the court of the first instant I wonder?
What year did that happen?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".


Offline The General

I do what?
Know what violence these stereotyped council estate nutters could do.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Eleanor

we might if we knew what you were talking about

That, My Dear, is your problem.

Offline Eleanor

We now know what isn't defamatory though.

Don't we ever.