As we approach 2023, have we learned anything new?

[kizzy]

Madeleine's is an active ongoing case.  As we speak there is a prime suspect for crimes against her under lock and key in a German prison.  Where he is being held as a direct result of his guilt in crimes against women and children including aggravated rape.

This year he will be tried for another three aggravated rapes as well as further assaults on children.  Up until the tenth anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance there had been absolutely no chance of this dangerous man being apprehended and removed from the opportunities in which he had indulged making him a danger to women and children.
The chief suspect in the Madeleine McCann case has been denied parole and branded a 'danger to society.

Lead German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters told the Mirror: “His request was rejected on the grounds that he could not be given a positive social prognosis.

“In other words, the court has said it believes that the convict will commit further offences if released.”
Meg Hill
Tuesday 03 May 2022 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/madeleine-mccann-christian-brueckner-metropolitan-police-portuguese-germany-b2070206.html

But he is still eligible for it in May 2023.

Brueckner will now stay in jail until at least May 2023, the next time a parole application can be made.

[Brietta]

Perhaps, like some of us, they prefer to see rather than just believe.

Perhaps, like some, there are those who prefer to allow a dangerous sex offender better known as Patsy to wander the streets unimpeded.

Hopefully 2023 will see this danger to society suffer a further curtailment to his nefarious activities.  Those who protest his innocence based on nothing but prejudice can always hope against hope for him.

[Brietta]

I don't understand the problem here with The BKA, since most of you seem to think that Madeleine is dead anyway.  So the only bone of contention appears to be with who dunnit.  Same old same old.  Nothing new.

As far as I can see from the sceptic 'logic' expressed ~ it doesn't matter who the suspect is or what they are suspected of doing ~ if the victim is Madeleine McCann they are automatically considered innocent.

We saw it first with the "arguidos" in 2014 who were accused of nothing but who had to be interviewed as 'persons of interest' - and we see it yet again with the 2022 "arguido".

[G-Unit]

Perhaps, like some, there are those who prefer to allow a dangerous sex offender better known as Patsy to wander the streets unimpeded.

Hopefully 2023 will see this danger to society suffer a further curtailment to his nefarious activities.  Those who protest his innocence based on nothing but prejudice can always hope against hope for him.

I don't know if Brueckner is guilty of further crimes or not. The normal way of informing us of these crimes is by using the courts to convict criminals. Prosecutors are not authorised to pronounce guilt, it's not their job. The way the law works is that criminals can wander the streets unimpeded until found guilty by a court of law.

[Brietta]

But he is still eligible for it in May 2023.

Brueckner will now stay in jail until at least May 2023, the next time a parole application can be made.

And you are hoping fervently for the release of a child molester and an aggravated rapist onto the streets.

One can only hope he parks his cartoon covered van in your garden and nowhere near mine.

[kizzy]

Perhaps, like some, there are those who prefer to allow a dangerous sex offender better known as Patsy to wander the streets unimpeded.

Hopefully 2023 will see this danger to society suffer a further curtailment to his nefarious activities.  Those who protest his innocence based on nothing but prejudice can always hope against hope for him.

why do you twist it into some sort of defense for CB.

When you know it just not believing that CB is involved in what happened to Maddie.

[Brietta]

I don't know if Brueckner is guilty of further crimes or not. The normal way of informing us of these crimes is by using the courts to convict criminals. Prosecutors are not authorised to pronounce guilt, it's not their job. The way the law works is that criminals can wander the streets unimpeded until found guilty by a court of law.

The whole object of collecting evidence is to allow justice to be served.  If the supporting evidence proves guilt justice will be delivered on the culprit.

This is an important step in the process with which sceptics are in disagreement.  Because Brueckner is suspected of crimes against Madeleine McCann about which sceptics have a pet conspiracy theory, they automatically protest his innocence.  Totally illogical!

[kizzy]

And you are hoping fervently for the release of a child molester and an aggravated rapist onto the streets.

One can only hope he parks his cartoon covered van in your garden and nowhere near mine.

Did I say that ......No.

Another twisted post.

[Brietta]

why do you twist it into some sort of defense for CB.

When you know it just not believing that CB is involved in what happened to Maddie.

You are basing your belief in Brueckner's innocence on your prejudice.

I prefer to wait for the BKA investigators to present the evidence they have gathered to a judge in a court of law and to allow die process to determine guilt or no guilt.

You are missing out that very important step in the process.

[Wonderfulspam]

You are basing your belief in Brueckner's innocence on your prejudice.

I prefer to wait for the BKA investigators to present the evidence they have gathered to a judge in a court of law and to allow die process to determine guilt or no guilt.

You are missing out that very important step in the process.

You still haven't explained how you know the McCanns are innocent.

[Wonderfulspam]

The whole object of collecting evidence is to allow justice to be served.  If the supporting evidence proves guilt justice will be delivered on the culprit.

This is an important step in the process with which sceptics are in disagreement.  Because Brueckner is suspected of crimes against Madeleine McCann about which sceptics have a pet conspiracy theory, they automatically protest his innocence.  Totally illogical!

Well he won't be getting charged with anything related to Maddie any time in the foreseeable future, so that does tell us something about the strength of the concrete evidence against him really.

[Brietta]

Well he won't be getting charged with anything related to Maddie any time in the foreseeable future, so that does tell us something about the strength of the concrete evidence against him really.

Is anyone else as bored by this fixated, mind numbing wind up merchant who epitomises the saying that empty vessels make the most noise. 

[Angelo222]

Is anyone else as bored by this fixated, mind numbing wind up merchant who epitomises the saying that empty vessels make the most noise.

Wummy has his moments but he does talk some sense some of the time.

[Angelo222]

The whole object of collecting evidence is to allow justice to be served.  If the supporting evidence proves guilt justice will be delivered on the culprit.

This is an important step in the process with which sceptics are in disagreement.  Because Brueckner is suspected of crimes against Madeleine McCann about which sceptics have a pet conspiracy theory, they automatically protest his innocence.  Totally illogical!

The Germans made the mistake of naming Bruckner so now that have to accept that basic error. Innocent until proven guilty applies to even Bruckner.

[kizzy]

You are basing your belief in Brueckner's innocence on your prejudice.

I prefer to wait for the BKA investigators to present the evidence they have gathered to a judge in a court of law and to allow die process to determine guilt or no guilt.

You are missing out that very important step in the process.

No I'm basing it on a comment like this


And you are hoping fervently for the release of a child molester and an aggravated rapist onto the streets.

Twisting an opinon into something nast ...that you continue to do in your posts