The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Mr Gray]

I'm resurrecting this thread as numerous members have indicated they still believe Brueckner is going to be charged. Some believe there is already enough evidence against him.
So I'd like to hear from members...

What evidence do you believe the police have against Christian Brueckner?

Why should anyone engage with a wum..you can't have it both ways..

[Wonderfulspam]

Why should anyone engage with a wum..you can't have it both ways..

Nope. That doesn't sound much like evidence against Christan Brueckner to me I'm afraid. I can't see Wolters mentioning that in his opening statement. But thanks anyway.

[misty]

What do posters think of the points below, as raised by Christian B in one of his letters, and how would the presence of an "injured/ damaged child" fit with the dog alerts in 5A? CB makes a definite distinction between a living and a dead child imo.

“Are there DNA traces of the injured party in my vehicle? Are there any other traces of the damaged party in my possession? Photos? And, not to forget, is there a dead body?"

[barrier]

What do posters think of the points below, as raised by Christian B in one of his letters, and how would the presence of an "injured/ damaged child" fit with the dog alerts in 5A? CB makes a definite distinction between a living and a dead child imo.

“Are there DNA traces of the injured party in my vehicle? Are there any other traces of the damaged party in my possession? Photos? And, not to forget, is there a dead body?"

IMO he makes clear there are no links to him , I guess then the argument is, is it because he his totally innocent in all of this or  the lack of evidence linking him despite Wolters confidence..

[Vertigo Swirl]

What do posters think of the points below, as raised by Christian B in one of his letters, and how would the presence of an "injured/ damaged child" fit with the dog alerts in 5A? CB makes a definite distinction between a living and a dead child imo.

“Are there DNA traces of the injured party in my vehicle? Are there any other traces of the damaged party in my possession? Photos? And, not to forget, is there a dead body?"

I don't know but it's a very odd, distancing way of describing a missing 3 year old child, as an "injured / damaged party"

[misty]

IMO he makes clear there are no links to him , I guess then the argument is, is it because he his totally innocent in all of this or  the lack of evidence linking him despite Wolters confidence..

When did BKA, or anyone else for that matter, indicate CB had an injured/damaged Madeleine in his vehicle?

[barrier]

When did BKA, or anyone else for that matter, indicate CB had an injured/damaged Madeleine in his vehicle?

Wolters had to correct SF when she tried to say they'd found forensics in one of his vehicles .

[misty]

I don't know but it's a very odd, distancing way of describing a missing 3 year old child, as an "injured / damaged party"

Agreed.
"I know what happened to Madeleine McCann" is also CB distancing himself from aspects of her disappearance imo.

Then there are his comments below from another letter - how can he possibly know what the police have or haven't found in relation to Madeleine post-disappearance?

[misty]

Wolters had to correct SF when she tried to say they'd found forensics in one of his vehicles .

SF made reference to fibres and that is what HCW was forced to correct.

[barrier]

Agreed.
"I know what happened to Madeleine McCann" is also CB distancing himself from aspects of her disappearance imo.

Then there are his comments below from another letter - how can he possibly know what the police have or haven't found in relation to Madeleine post-disappearance?

Is that his hand writing ?

[barrier]

SF made reference to fibres and that is what HCW was forced to correct.

Indeed and or until Wolters/BKA decide to let the world know and more importantly CB's legal team its all guess work.

[Mr Gray]

Indeed and or until Wolters/BKA decide to let the world know and more importantly CB's legal team its all guess work.

Deduction...not guesswork afaiac

[misty]

Is that his hand writing ?

Yes.

[barrier]

Deduction...not guesswork afaiac

When Wolters declared he had concrete evidence in 2020 no doubt some deduced charges would soon follow, how wide of the mark was that.

[Mr Gray]

When Wolters declared he had concrete evidence in 2020 no doubt some deduced charges would soon follow, how wide of the mark was that.

As I recall it was about 18 months ago that it was claimed CB would not face charges in the Behan vase