The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Wonderfulspam]

Maybe he did.  Maybe he didn't.  But that is for a court to decide.  I just hate internet Kangaroo courts being set up by ignoramuses, don't you?

As things stand, he didn't do it. He stands accused of nothing. He hasn't even been charged with anything you see. So no, it isn't for a court to decide. The didn't do it guy is as innocent as the McCanns are.

[Eleanor]

As things stand, he didn't do it. He stands accused of nothing. He hasn't even been charged with anything you see. So no, it isn't for a court to decide. The didn't do it guy is as innocent as the McCanns are.

This doesn't amount to He Didn't Do It.  It only amounts to We Don't Know.

You might think that you are very clever, but in fact you aren't.  You can't even play a half decent word game.

[Wonderfulspam]

This doesn't amount to He Didn't Do It.  It only amounts to We Don't Know.

You might think that you are very clever, but in fact you aren't.  You can't even play a half decent word game.

So you'd agree we can't be certain the McCanns didn't do it?

[Eleanor]

So you'd agree we can't be certain the McCanns didn't do it?

The McCanns Didn't Do It.  Have you not even worked that one out yet?  Mind you, it does require a brain of some sort, so try not to worry about it.

[Wonderfulspam]

The McCanns Didn't Do It. Have you not even worked that one out yet?  Mind you, it does require a brain of some sort, so try not to worry about it.

Brueckner didn't do it. Wolters can't prove he's done anything, & you went from "I will stick with Innocent Until Proven Guilty in a Court of Law." to, "Maybe he did it" in the space of two posts, plus insults, as per usual.

[Eleanor]

Brueckner didn't do it. Wolters can't prove he's done anything, & you went from "I will stick with Innocent Until Proven Guilty in a Court of Law." to, "Maybe he did it" in the space of two posts, plus insults, as per usual.

It seems that you can't read and understand written English either.  Oh Dear.  Never mind.

[Wonderfulspam]

It seems that you can't read and understand written English either.  Oh Dear.  Never mind.

Do you have anything other than insults to add to the forum?

[Eleanor]

Is there anybody there?

Nope.  Okay.  Back Later.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Is there anybody there?

Nope.  Okay.  Back Later.

Most people looking for sensible discussion no longer post here - I blame the troll.  He’s virtually the last manchild standing which is kind of ironic really. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Is there anybody there?

Nope.  Okay.  Back Later.

Any charges for Brueckner coming? No? OK. Well get back to me when.

[Wonderfulspam]

Most people looking for sensible discussion no longer post here - I blame the troll.  He’s virtually the last manchild standing which is kind of ironic really.

Well come on then. Let's have a very serious & sensible, on topic discussion about the evidence against Christian Brueckner.
What evidence convinces you Brueckner is guilty?

[G-Unit]

Most people looking for sensible discussion no longer post here - I blame the troll.  He’s virtually the last manchild standing which is kind of ironic really.

Wonderfulspam isn't the reason why I no longer post here very much. It's not him who has consistently made posting difficult for me. I will post on topic, however. It seems that Wolters' 'concrete evidence' was something that may have convinced him of his suspect's guilt, but it's not going to convince a court of law that CB murdered MM.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wonderfulspam isn't the reason why I no longer post here very much. It's not him who has consistently made posting difficult for me. I will post on topic, however. It seems that Wolters' 'concrete evidence' was something that may have convinced him of his suspect's guilt, but it's not going to convince a court of law that CB murdered MM.

I very much doubt HCW is the only person on the planet convinced by the evidence the BKA have gathered so far.  We don’t know whether or not it would convince a court beyond reasonable doubt, but it might be 95% convincing. Pointless speculating isn’t it?

PS if someone is making it difficult for you to post on here I can thoroughly recommend putting them on ignore.  The troll doesn’t make it difficult for me to post, he just brings the forum into disrepute and means it’s hard to take the forum seriously.

[G-Unit]

I very much doubt HCW is the only person on the planet convinced by the evidence the BKA have gathered so far.  We don’t know whether or not it would convince a court beyond reasonable doubt, but it might be 95% convincing. Pointless speculating isn’t it?

PS if someone is making it difficult for you to post on here I can thoroughly recommend putting them on ignore.  The troll doesn’t make it difficult for me to post, he just brings the forum into disrepute and means it’s hard to take the forum seriously.

There's speculating and there's observing. I've seen big claims but no actions and it's actions which count.

Labelling people seems to provide the justification for some treating them badly, imo. GA is a 'proven liar', CB is a 'paedophile rapist', and Wonderfulspam is a 'troll' and a 'wum'. Result! Everything they say can be ignored! Talk about throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Perhaps the Germans know better; they will listen to dodgy criminals if it furthers their knowledge (or if they think it does).

[Vertigo Swirl]

There's speculating and there's observing. I've seen big claims but no actions and it's actions which count.

Labelling people seems to provide the justification for some treating them badly, imo. GA is a 'proven liar', CB is a 'paedophile rapist', and Wonderfulspam is a 'troll' and a 'wum'. Result! Everything they say can be ignored! Talk about throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Perhaps the Germans know better; they will listen to dodgy criminals if it furthers their knowledge (or if they think it does).

GA IS a proven liar, CB IS a paedophile rapist, Spam IS a troll, why do you believe any of them should be indulged and given the time of day?  What do any of them have to say which is worthwhile and gains us a better perspective on this case?  Isn’t “dodgy criminal” a label too? You’ve made it quite clear that you think everything I have to say is pointless and worthy of ignoring so what does that make you?