Author Topic: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner  (Read 96988 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #390 on: June 01, 2023, 09:27:36 AM »
GA IS a proven liar, CB IS a paedophile rapist, Spam IS a troll, why do you believe any of them should be indulged and given the time of day?  What do any of them have to say which is worthwhile and gains us a better perspective on this case?  Isn’t “dodgy criminal” a label too? You’ve made it quite clear that you think everything I have to say is pointless and worthy of ignoring so what does that make you?

Ignoring everything someone says or does because a label's been applied to them is very short sighted in my opinion. Anyone who uses labelling as a way to sum someone else up is missing out on a lot of information. Dismissing GA as a 'liar' for example, led to his book being dismissed as 'lies' and ignored the fact that it was a mostly truthful account of the investigation into MM's disappearance and how it developed. It wasn't a libellous attack on the McCanns as was finally decided by all the courts which examined it.

The Germans and the Met chose to listen to a people trafficker and found that what he had to say was useful to them. It remains to be seen whether they will get the result they hope for, but they are prepared to listen.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #391 on: June 01, 2023, 09:50:01 AM »

I am not having this Site turned into a Lawless Cess Pit.  It is as simple as that for me.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #392 on: June 01, 2023, 10:03:47 AM »
Ignoring everything someone says or does because a label's been applied to them is very short sighted in my opinion. Anyone who uses labelling as a way to sum someone else up is missing out on a lot of information. Dismissing GA as a 'liar' for example, led to his book being dismissed as 'lies' and ignored the fact that it was a mostly truthful account of the investigation into MM's disappearance and how it developed. It wasn't a libellous attack on the McCanns as was finally decided by all the courts which examined it.

The Germans and the Met chose to listen to a people trafficker and found that what he had to say was useful to them. It remains to be seen whether they will get the result they hope for, but they are prepared to listen.

Total garbage from start to finish

Offline John

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #393 on: June 01, 2023, 10:31:28 AM »
GA IS a proven liar, CB IS a paedophile rapist, Spam IS a troll, why do you believe any of them should be indulged and given the time of day?  What do any of them have to say which is worthwhile and gains us a better perspective on this case?  Isn’t “dodgy criminal” a label too? You’ve made it quite clear that you think everything I have to say is pointless and worthy of ignoring so what does that make you?

Show me someone who claims to have never lied and you will have shown me a liar.  Gonçalo was the closest policeman to the original investigation and he was sacked because he chose to speak out about the investigation and of political interference. Says much for me.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline kizzy

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #394 on: June 01, 2023, 10:38:54 AM »
Total garbage from start to finish

Yours are too.

Your vocabulary is very limited in posts when they do not fit with your agenda.

Seems to always hit a nerve.

Offline kizzy

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #395 on: June 01, 2023, 10:39:40 AM »
Show me someone who claims to have never lied and you will have shown me a liar.  Gonçalo was the closest policeman to the original investigation and he was sacked because he chose to speak out about the investigation and of political interference. Says much for me.

 8@??)(

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #396 on: June 01, 2023, 10:39:59 AM »
I am not having this Site turned into a Lawless Cess Pit.  It is as simple as that for me.

Enforcing the rules without bias is all you need to do, it's as simple as that.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #397 on: June 01, 2023, 10:47:06 AM »
Enforcing the rules without bias is all you need to do, it's as simple as that.

I afford you more courtesy than you deserve.  The rest is self evident as you will know.  You being in knowledge of everything I do.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #398 on: June 01, 2023, 10:47:10 AM »
The latest news today from HCW is that the investigation into CB will continue 'for some time'.
They've been investigating him since 2017 already. Let's give them another 6 years before we write them off completely.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #399 on: June 01, 2023, 10:48:02 AM »
Yours are too.

Your vocabulary is very limited in posts when they do not fit with your agenda.

Seems to always hit a nerve.
more garbage

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #400 on: June 01, 2023, 10:51:13 AM »
Total garbage from start to finish

To start with spam is a self confessed something or other and seems quite proud of the fact.  The post went downhill after that point.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #401 on: June 01, 2023, 10:53:42 AM »
more garbage

Well, you should know what garbage is .imo HCW is full of it.

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #402 on: June 01, 2023, 10:56:38 AM »
Show me someone who claims to have never lied and you will have shown me a liar.  Gonçalo was the closest policeman to the original investigation and he was sacked because he chose to speak out about the investigation and of political interference. Says much for me.

The man's recent unbalanced interference in an active police investigation designed to throw it off track, says it all for me.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #403 on: June 01, 2023, 11:04:34 AM »
Show me someone who claims to have never lied and you will have shown me a liar.  Gonçalo was the closest policeman to the original investigation and he was sacked because he chose to speak out about the investigation and of political interference. Says much for me.
Of course people lie, we all do it to a greater or lesser extent.  But when we tell serious lies we get punished for them, GA has a conviction for perjury in case you'd forgotten?  He has also lied on television about the appearance of CB and his vehicle at the time of Madeleine's disappearance.  He also wrote a one sided book full of half-truths and propaganda pushing the "parents dunnit" angle (a conclusion he came to by his own admittance on day one of the investigation) without giving any serious consideration to any other theory.  Now tell me why anyone should take a word of what he has to say seriously?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #404 on: June 01, 2023, 11:04:51 AM »
Show me someone who claims to have never lied and you will have shown me a liar.  Gonçalo was the closest policeman to the original investigation and he was sacked because he chose to speak out about the investigation and of political interference. Says much for me.
Saying you were late due to a traffic jam is not the same as lying undewr oath in court on a matter that resulted in a woman spending 20 yeras in jail. i know you dont accept a confession was beaten out Leonora but its clear it was.

Amaral also lied to Sandra F re the evidence.
The PJ were closest to the investigation into the rape OF DM but failed to solve itSame goes for the rape of HB and the sexual as sault of the two children that a re the subject of present charges.

Amaral was a proven liar...not just on one occasion. I can say that without fear of libel because its true