The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[faithlilly]

It was never intended to be the ''crime of the century'' though.

The  tenacity of the McCann's in demanding Madeleine was looked for was never anticipated.

The denial exhibited on the behalf of a proven rapist and child abuser is somewhat indicative of a particular outlook.

The rush to judgement on behalf of two child-neglecting individuals is also indicative of a particular outlook wouldnt you say?

[Vertigo Swirl]

From cadging ciggies and weed off his mates and boosting fuel oil from wagons using literally carrier bags, to planning, executing and getting away with the crime of the century. Even under the scrutiny of the entire planet he's still getting away with it.
How he managed to get convicted for anything remains a mystery, given his criminal acumen.

Well if two law abiding doctors who pledged to do no harm can go from nought to child abuse and murder, why not a petty criminal?

[faithlilly]

Well if two law abiding doctors who pledged to do no harm can go from nought to child abuse and murder, why not a petty criminal?

Child abuse? Murder?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Child abuse? Murder?

Hello comrade!  Yes child abuse and murder.  Prove me wrong.

[faithlilly]

Hello comrade!  Yes child abuse and murder.  Prove me wrong.

I’d say accident followed by body occultation far more likely.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’d say accident followed by body occultation far more likely.

Why not a murder?  Don’t you think the Gaspar Statement highly relevant?  But murder or no, with body occultation and all the fraud that followed my point remains:  if this pair of otherwise blemish free doctors can go from law abiding citizens to perpetrating the fraud of the century after callously chucking their daughter in a bin, surely it’s possible for a petty criminal with a penchant for young girls to go from being a thief and abuser to a kidnapper and killer?  No, on reflection I see that that is almost certainly impossible as CB just doesn’t have the cunning, physical ability or the right psychological profile for it, being a mere burglar and rapist.

[Wonderfulspam]

There isn't a shred of evidence Brueckner ever set foot in 5a. None nothing. Whereas there is plenty of evidence the McCanns did. This alone makes it more likely the McCanns did it than Brueckner.

[Eleanor]

There isn't a shred of evidence Brueckner ever set foot in 5a. None nothing. Whereas there is plenty of evidence the McCanns did. This alone makes it more likely the McCanns did it than Brueckner.

How frightfully clever of you.

[Wonderfulspam]

How frightfully clever of you.

It's true. Wolters can't even prove Brueckner was even in Luz. The McCanns definitely were though. So it's more likely it was them.

[faithlilly]

Why not a murder?  Don’t you think the Gaspar Statement highly relevant?  But murder or no, with body occultation and all the fraud that followed my point remains:  if this pair of otherwise blemish free doctors can go from law abiding citizens to perpetrating the fraud of the century after callously chucking their daughter in a bin, surely it’s possible for a petty criminal with a penchant for young girls to go from being a thief and abuser to a kidnapper and killer?  No, on reflection I see that that is almost certainly impossible as CB just doesn’t have the cunning, physical ability or the right psychological profile for it, being a mere burglar and rapist.

Anything is possible I suppose but there’s no evidence that Brueckner is involved. Where’s Brueckner’s  ‘Martin Smith’?

[jassi]

Anything is possible I suppose but there’s no evidence that Brueckner is involved. Where’s Brueckner’s  ‘Martin Smith’?

There's no evidence that paedophilia is involved either.
If OG hadn't decided in advance of any evidence that paedophilia was involved, there would be no reason to even consider Brueckner.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Anything is possible I suppose but there’s no evidence that Brueckner is involved. Where’s Brueckner’s  ‘Martin Smith’?

If I recall correctly a number of individuals have claimed Bruckner has confessed involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance to them, so does that count?  Probably not as criminals can’t tell the truth, not ever, but then that means Christian Bruckner can’t be telling the truth either when he says he didn’t do it so I don’t know quite where that leaves us.  Also, Hazel Behan was not 60-80% sure CB raped her but 100% sure, so that trumps Martin Smith too, but apparently you now need to be 180% sure before the judge will believe any words a rape victim says. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

There's no evidence that paedophilia is involved either.
If OG hadn't decided in advance of any evidence that paedophilia was involved, there would be no reason to even consider Brueckner.

Gaspar Statement, isn’t that evidence now?  Jesus H, call yourself a sceptic??

[faithlilly]

If I recall correctly a number of individuals have claimed Bruckner has confessed involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance to them, so does that count?  Probably not as criminals can’t tell the truth, not ever, but then that means Christian Bruckner can’t be telling the truth either when he says he didn’t do it so I don’t know quite where that leaves us.  Also, Hazel Behan was not 60-80% sure CB raped her but 100% sure, so that trumps Martin Smith too, but apparently you now need to be 180% sure before the judge will believe any words a rape victim says.

Quite possibly Brueckner did rape that poor girl but he was not convicted of it and it is possible that Brueckner abducted Madeleine, unlikely but possible but not one charge has been lodged against him in relation to that case in, how many years is it, so he is as innocent as you or I at this point. If Brueckner’s friend’s statements were thought to be at all convincing he would at least have been charged by now which suggests to me even Germany’s highest prosecutors think Brueckner’s friend’s evidence, at the very least, lacks honesty.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Quite possibly Brueckner did rape that poor girl but he was not convicted of it and it is possible that Brueckner abducted Madeleine, unlikely but possible but not one charge has been lodged against him in relation to that case in, how many years is it, so he is as innocent as you or I at this point. If Brueckner’s friend’s statements were thought to be at all convincing he would at least have been charged by now which suggests to me even Germany’s highest prosecutors think Brueckner’s friend’s evidence, at the very least, lacks honesty.

I don’t think you can bring charges against someone for murder just on someone else’s say so, no matter how honest they appear to be.  Martin Smith is a fine and upstanding gentleman who was absolutely certain (well almost) that he saw Gerry McCann carrying a child that night and no charges were ever brought against him, so….