Author Topic: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner  (Read 112688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #135 on: January 04, 2023, 08:22:00 AM »
It’s surprising then that they did nothing but whinge to the tabloids when the PJ wouldn’t share evidence with them.

Then they went to court to try to force Leicestershire Police to give them their evidence.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #136 on: January 04, 2023, 08:26:20 AM »
Presumably G-Unit would have no problem with HCW if he had kept quiet until the day after CB was no longer an official suspect and then resigned to publish a damning book about the rapist’s involvement in Madeleine’s abduction and murder, a book that went on to be an international bestseller.  That would have been perfectly fair of course, and not harmed CB one jot.

If it was written to defend his position and explained the details of the investigation why not?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #137 on: January 04, 2023, 08:46:28 AM »
If it was written to defend his position and explained the details of the investigation why not?
So you don’t think such a book might cause harm to its subject?  Or to any future court action that might be brought against the subject?  Why not?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #138 on: January 04, 2023, 09:03:09 AM »
Then they went to court to try to force Leicestershire Police to give them their evidence.

This is not true.  Just a distortion of what actually happened.  Nothing new about that.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #139 on: January 04, 2023, 09:04:54 AM »
If it was written to defend his position and explained the details of the investigation why not?

But was it?  I don't think so.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #140 on: January 04, 2023, 09:17:54 AM »
But was it?  I don't think so.
I think revenge and money were the primary motivating factors.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #141 on: January 04, 2023, 09:20:31 AM »
This is not true.  Just a distortion of what actually happened.  Nothing new about that.

Please do explain what is untrue in my post?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #142 on: January 04, 2023, 09:22:51 AM »
But was it?  I don't think so.

That's what the courts decided.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #143 on: January 04, 2023, 09:30:50 AM »
Please do explain what is untrue in my post?

The McCanns asked The Court for information about the disappearance of their daughter.  The Court granted this request.

There was No Force involved in this.  You have just tried to distort The Facts yet again.  Why do you do this?

Offline jassi

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #144 on: January 04, 2023, 09:39:17 AM »
The McCanns asked The Court for information about the disappearance of their daughter.  The Court granted this request.

There was No Force involved in this.  You have just tried to distort The Facts yet again.  Why do you do this?

Having to go to court over the issue suggests that Leicester police were unwilling to provide this information freely, so there was an element of force. IMO
I seem to recall that requests for information from other bodies were refused
« Last Edit: January 04, 2023, 09:42:08 AM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #145 on: January 04, 2023, 10:08:15 AM »
I have stromg pointers against Bruckner, some mentioned before, but ignored by you.

There are others mentioned by Brietta and others, but ignored by you.


And there are others which I do not intend to share, but I have no actual proof.   Therefore as far as I am concerned, Bruckner is innocent .   but he is on the Back burner.


 
I think Bruckner is a driver, climber and enterer of buildings,   He may have taken Madeleine up to Porto area, on the day after Madeleine was abducted, as witnessed by Carlos Moreira at the roadside cafe on the N10 (old main road up to Porto).   I believe that he might later have transported her eastwards across Portugal, via interesting ...'sighting' towns to Barcelona and the Victiria Beckham look alike there      BUT, I DONT KNOW for sure.   
Therefore he is innocent.    And if involved, he just works to the orders of the real perps.   A paid handyman.   IMO


I think that Wolters may well have been conned to give respite to the real perps.   If I were the Police, I might be looking at some of his superiors to see their connections.


I believe that Madeleine is very much alive.   Her outstanding bloodline is a treasure to someone


Everything above is from my opinion only, but based upon a great deal of deep research

Some interesting points there Sadie. Happy New Year 💖
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #146 on: January 04, 2023, 10:19:30 AM »
Some interesting points there Sadie. Happy New Year 💖

Thank You for that.  Sadie remains entirely entitled to her views.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #147 on: January 04, 2023, 11:09:58 AM »
The McCanns asked The Court for information about the disappearance of their daughter.  The Court granted this request.

There was No Force involved in this.  You have just tried to distort The Facts yet again.  Why do you do this?

They tried to force Leicester Constabulary to release to them all the information relating to the case. Not only did LP refuse, but SOCO and the Attorney General intervened in support of them.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #148 on: January 04, 2023, 11:14:47 AM »
They tried to force Leicester Constabulary to release to them all the information relating to the case. Not only did LP refuse, but SOCO and the Attorney General intervened in support of them.

How did The McCanns try to force anyone?  Did The McCanns get the information they asked for?

Stop talking bollix.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #149 on: January 04, 2023, 11:18:04 AM »
How did The McCanns try to force anyone?  Did The McCanns get the information they asked for?

Stop talking bollix.

By authorising their solicitors to take LP to court to force them to comply to their request for information.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0