Author Topic: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner  (Read 96861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #150 on: January 04, 2023, 11:24:40 AM »
By authorising their solicitors to take LP to court to force them to comply to their request for information.

Did The McCanns get the information?

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #151 on: January 04, 2023, 11:37:53 AM »
I have stromg pointers against Bruckner, some mentioned before, but ignored by you.

There are others mentioned by Brietta and others, but ignored by you.


And there are others which I do not intend to share, but I have no actual proof.   Therefore as far as I am concerned, Bruckner is innocent .   but he is on the Back burner.


 
I think Bruckner is a driver, climber and enterer of buildings,   He may have taken Madeleine up to Porto area, on the day after Madeleine was abducted, as witnessed by Carlos Moreira at the roadside cafe on the N10 (old main road up to Porto).   I believe that he might later have transported her eastwards across Portugal, via interesting ...'sighting' towns to Barcelona and the Victiria Beckham look alike there      BUT, I DONT KNOW for sure.   
Therefore he is innocent.    And if involved, he just works to the orders of the real perps.   A paid handyman.   IMO


I think that Wolters may well have been conned to give respite to the real perps.   If I were the Police, I might be looking at some of his superiors to see their connections.


I believe that Madeleine is very much alive.   Her outstanding bloodline is a treasure to someone


Everything above is from my opinion only, but based upon a great deal of deep research

It would be almost impossible to find a suspect who ticks all the boxes in the way Brueckner does.  But having the 'perfect' profile does not a murderer make him.

It will take the evidence to do that.

In the interim - his legal team pretty much have their hands full dealing with the five serious cases they are dealing with on his behalf.
Aggravated rapes are not frivolous accusations - nor are sexually motivated attacks on children.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #152 on: January 04, 2023, 11:44:53 AM »
Then they went to court to try to force Leicestershire Police to give them their evidence.

You really do have a jaded view if events which deviates from the reality of situations - which is why nothing you post is worth the wasted bandwith.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #153 on: January 04, 2023, 11:59:03 AM »
The McCanns asked The Court for information about the disappearance of their daughter.  The Court granted this request.

There was No Force involved in this.  You have just tried to distort The Facts yet again.  Why do you do this?

I have absolutely no intention of slogging my way through the sceptic lexicon of Mccann hatred and myth.  Life is far too short for that even for those who have managed to overlook fifteen years of events proving them and the main author discredited and wrong on each and every count.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #154 on: January 04, 2023, 12:03:07 PM »
It would be almost impossible to find a suspect who ticks all the boxes in the way Brueckner does.  But having the 'perfect' profile does not a murderer make him.

It will take the evidence to do that.

In the interim - his legal team pretty much have their hands full dealing with the five serious cases they are dealing with on his behalf.
Aggravated rapes are not frivolous accusations - nor are sexually motivated attacks on children.

Yes, Brueckner is a monster. But the scary thing is, there are actually people worse than him. He's like a saint compared to Damien Bendall.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #155 on: January 04, 2023, 12:25:24 PM »
Did The McCanns get the information?

No. The original order was changed too so it couldn't be used to try to force the police to hand over confidential police evidence again.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #156 on: January 04, 2023, 12:29:59 PM »
Yes, Brueckner is a monster. But the scary thing is, there are actually people worse than him. He's like a saint compared to Damien Bendall.

I can think of no lexicon of saints which includes rapists and child molesters among its numbers and I think the degrees in which you determine sainthood are equally perverse.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #157 on: January 04, 2023, 12:37:47 PM »
I can think of no lexicon of saints which includes rapists and child molesters among its numbers and I think the degrees in which you determine sainthood are equally perverse.

Well, he didn't rape any of his victims while they were dying from hammer inflicted head injuries anyway.
He's evil, but not that evil.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #158 on: January 04, 2023, 12:40:39 PM »
No. The original order was changed too so it couldn't be used to try to force the police to hand over confidential police evidence again.

Entirely off topic - but if you can't beat them ...  the following is an example of what the McCanns had to endure throughout their fight on Madeleine's behalf.
Absolutely disgraceful that they are still being subjected to more of the same when all the FACTS are now known and are crystal clear!  Particularly the fact that there is a realistic suspect in police custody.

Leveson inquiry: ex-police chief defends not preventing false McCann DNA reports
This article is more than 10 years old
Matthew Baggott says it was correct 'not to put the record straight' over false reports about Madeleine McCann case
Lisa O'Carroll
@lisaocarroll
Wed 28 Mar 2012
The UK police were right not to "put the record straight" over false reports claiming Gerry and Kate McCann were implicated in their daughter's disappearance, the Leveson inquiry has heard.

Matthew Baggott, the former chief constable of Leicestershire police, told the inquiry on Wednesday he could not have released information about DNA tests conducted in the UK to counter leaks by the Portuguese police that falsely claimed they showed the McCanns had hidden Madeleine in the boot of a hire car in Portugal.

Baggott said there were both legal and professional reasons for this. Portuguese secrecy laws made it "utterly wrong to have somehow, in an off-the-record way, have breached what was a very clear legal requirement upon the Portuguese themselves", he told Lord Justice Leveson.

He also said the Leicestershire force's priority was to maintain a positive relationship with the Portuguese police, with a view to "eventually ... resolving what happened to that poor child".

Last November the Leveson inquiry heard how the Daily Express reported there was DNA evidence that could show the little girl's body had been stored in the spare tyre well of a hire car.

It turned out the analysis conducted in the UK was "inconclusive" and there was no foundation for making that allegation. Express Newspapers paid £550,000 damages to the McCann's in 2008 for inaccurate reporting by the Daily Express and the publisher's three other titles.

Leveson asked Baggot about evidence submitted by a Daily Star crime reporter two weeks ago that the Leicestershire police "knew perfectly well that the results didn't demonstrate that", and could have given off-the-record briefings to British journalists not to report a DNA link.

"Even with the benefit of hindsight, sir, I'm still convinced we did the right thing and I think integrity and confidence, particularly with the Portuguese, featured very highly in our decision-making at that time," said Baggott.

He added: "So the relationship of trust and confidence would have been undermined if we had gone off the record in some way or tried to put the record straight, contrary to the way in which the Portuguese law was configured and their own leadership of that."

When they appeared before Leveson late last year, Gerry and Kate McCann told how they were left distraught by false claims in the UK press that they were responsible for their daughter's disappearance or her death.

Leveson later accused the Daily Express of writing "complete piffle" and "tittle tattle" about Madeleine McCann.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/mar/28/leveson-madeleine-mccann-dna-police
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #159 on: January 04, 2023, 12:47:03 PM »
Well, he didn't rape any of his victims while they were dying from hammer inflicted head injuries anyway.
He's evil, but not that evil.

You do not know what Brueckner did or what he didn't do.  Quite simply - you have not seen the evidence!

Your puerile attempts to "shock" just cannot compensate for your ignorance and do nothing but bring the forum into disrepute - which is probably your intention.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #160 on: January 04, 2023, 12:57:31 PM »
You do not know what Brueckner did or what he didn't do. Quite simply - you have not seen the evidence!

Your puerile attempts to "shock" just cannot compensate for your ignorance and do nothing but bring the forum into disrepute - which is probably your intention.

Right.

So, back to my original question, the evidence against Christian Brueckner. Can you suggest what possible evidence against him there might be in the Madeleine McCann murder case?
I've asked this question repeatedly, yet I seem to be the only member giving any suggestions.
The rest of you seem more interested in slagging each other off at the moment.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #161 on: January 04, 2023, 01:01:34 PM »
Right.

So, back to my original question, the evidence against Christian Brueckner. Can you suggest what possible evidence against him there might be in the Madeleine McCann murder case?
I've asked this question repeatedly, yet I seem to be the only member giving any suggestions.
The rest of you seem more interested in slagging each other off at the moment.

I know I am right.  But thank you for your acknowledgement. 

Now please bear in mind the thread topic The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #162 on: January 04, 2023, 01:07:14 PM »
I know I am right.  But thank you for your acknowledgement. 

Now please bear in mind the thread topic The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

Yes, & the question What possible evidence could there be?

Examples:

Buschings testimony

The Undertakers testimony

Web chat

Phone tap recordings

Video or photographic evidence

A diary documenting crimes
..........

Anyone care to add to this list of possibilities?
« Last Edit: January 04, 2023, 01:22:37 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #163 on: January 04, 2023, 06:05:25 PM »
When a troll invites you to speculate you can be sure he only does so in order to mock and deride.  Don’t feed him please.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Anthro

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #164 on: January 04, 2023, 06:31:53 PM »
You clearly don't understand why Amaral wasn't found to have libelled the McCanns. It wasn't because Portuguese justice was wrong. It wasn't because the Portuguese hoodwinked the ECHR. It was because Amaral didn't libel them.

Wolters has breached Brueckner's human rights, however. Not by naming him, not by saying he personally thinks he did it, but by saying, as a prosecutor, that Brueckner is guilty.

“Wolters has breached Brueckner's human rights, however. Not by naming him, not by saying he personally thinks he did it, but by saying, as a prosecutor, that Brueckner is guilty”.

Has Wolters used the word ‘guilty’?