The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Brietta]

Yes. The potential evidence against Brueckner is best kept a secret.

Much like the actual evidence. No one gets to see it.
Not the MET, nor Brueckners's lawyers, not even a judge or Madeleine's parents.

Only Wolters gets to see the concrete evidence. Good for him. But keeping it a secret won't be securing a conviction against Brueckner any time. 

I'm sure he must realise that, but supporters are incredibly slow at catching on.

Sigh!

How many times do I have to explain to you!!

Madeleine's investigation is a live and active police investigation.

Evidence will not be shared with internet sleuths.

[Wonderfulspam]

Sigh!

How many times do I have to explain to you!!

Madeleine's investigation is a live and active police investigation.

Evidence will not be shared with internet sleuths.

Or judges.

[Brietta]

Or judges.

Do keep hoping.  But your record over the years of being consistently wrong will take some beating and all the wumming in the world won't sort it out for you.

[jassi]

Or judges.

Oe even other police forces/ OG don't seem to think Madeleine is  dead & are treating it as missing person.

[Wonderfulspam]

I've been saying that there wasn't any abductor for about the last 12 years now, & here we are, still no abductor.
I got that consistently right. I also said, over 2 years ago, for supporters to get back to me when Brueckner is charged, & here we are, still no charges for Brueckner. Fancy that aye.

[Wonderfulspam]

Oe even other police forces/ OG don't seem to think Madeleine is  dead & are treating it as missing person.

....& Madeleine's parents haven't given up hope. Even though there's concrete evidence she was murdered by Brueckner. Yeah, there's something doesn't quite tally up about that.

But never mind, it's probably not important. Can we complain about Amaral & dreadlocks instead? That way we won't have to face up to reality.

[barrier]

....& Madeleine's parents haven't given up hope. Even though there's concrete evidence she was murdered by Brueckner. Yeah, there's something doesn't quite tally up about that.

But never mind, it's probably not important. Can we complain about Amaral & dreadlocks instead? That way we won't have to face up to reality.

Maybe we ought book 10cc and have a Dreadlock holiday.

[Wonderfulspam]

Maybe we ought book 10cc and have a Dreadlock holiday.

As it happens, I don't like Cricket. I do love it! (but only 5 day Test Match. Don't like all that 50 over or T20 slog fest rubbish)

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway.  Back to the possible evidence against CB:

Buschings testimony

The Undertakers testimony

Web chat

Phone tap recordings

Video or photographic evidence

A diary documenting crimes
..........

Anyone care to add to this list of possibilities?

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway.  Back to the possible evidence against CB:

Buschings testimony

The Undertakers testimony

Web chat

Phone tap recordings

Video or photographic evidence

A diary documenting crimes
..........

Anyone care to add to this list of possibilities?

Guess not. Banging on & on about Amaral every day is clearly of more interest than the concrete evidence against the new prime suspect.

[Wonderfulspam]

Can anyone here hazard a guess as to quite why it is Wolters hasn't shared the concrete, 100% convincing, death evidence with either the MET or Madeleine's parents?

[Wonderfulspam]

8 December 2020

"If you knew the evidence we had you would come to the same conclusion as I do but I can't give you details because we don't want the accused to know what we have on him - these are tactical considerations."

"I can't promise, I can't guarantee that we have enough to bring a charge but I'm very confident because what we have so far doesn't allow any other conclusion at all."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55224904

[Wonderfulspam]

You're the PJ. It's May 4th 2007. The phone is ringing off the hook with every sighting of Maddie from Luz to Lapland. Psychics are calling with all their helpful information. The Tapas 7 are all pointing the finger towards Jane Tanner's sighting of a man carrying Maddie toward Murat's house.

My question.

How many officers should have been sent directly to the houses of every known sex offender within a 50 mile radius of apartment 5a? And at that time, what good reason was there to suspect that Christian Brueckner, specifically, might have abducted Maddie?

[Brietta]

I don't know - and to be honest I really do not care - but there seems to be more than a co-incidence between our Spammer's fixation with "CONCRETE EVIDENCE" and the rest of the sceptic lexicon.

Maddie case: "They seem not yet to be very sure about concrete evidence"
SIC News
04.06.2020
Carlos Carmo, former coordinator of the Judicial Police, analyzes the new developments in the investigation.

The former inspector of the JUDICIARY considers that the British police work with a budget that allows to pay informants and that, in this way, "from time to time appear some suspects", but that there seems to be no certainty as to concrete evidence regarding the German man considered a formal suspect.
https://sicnoticias.pt/especiais/caso-maddie---10-anos/2020-06-03-Caso-Maddie-Parecem-nao-estar-ainda-bem-seguros-relativamente-a-provas-concretas

Video Transcript:
CC – We just recently had the anniversary marking the disappearance of Maddie McCann. Over the years, occasionally some suspects emerge, it shouldn’t be forgotten that the English police works with quite a high financial budget, what I mean by this is that it is possible to use informants, to pay to informants, to see if the police can gather criminal intelligence. Therefore, I would not be surprised that the case, this case of the German man, that is detained, in jail, is also a case stemming from intelligence collected by the BKA [German Police acronym for Bundeskriminalamt]. However, we do not know what the reliability of that information is; note that the communiqué of the German police is broad, but simultaneously also looks to grasp at something more, it speaks of vehicles, two vehicles, speaks of the stay of this individual in the area of Portimão. So, they do not seem to be very sure about concrete evidence.
_____________________________________________________________________
RP – Carlos do Carmo, thank you so much for coming to the night edition with your views about this situation. Have a very good night.

// Translation by J.M. for the Textusa sisters //

*****

Comment from the blog:

A huge thank you to Joana!

We would like to highlight the date of this interview: June 4. This was on the next day after this story broke out on the evening of June 3.

[Wonderfulspam]

I don't know - and to be honest I really do not care - but there seems to be more than a co-incidence between our Spammer's fixation with "CONCRETE EVIDENCE" and the rest of the sceptic lexicon.

Maddie case: "They seem not yet to be very sure about concrete evidence"
SIC News
04.06.2020
Carlos Carmo, former coordinator of the Judicial Police, analyzes the new developments in the investigation.

The former inspector of the JUDICIARY considers that the British police work with a budget that allows to pay informants and that, in this way, "from time to time appear some suspects", but that there seems to be no certainty as to concrete evidence regarding the German man considered a formal suspect.
https://sicnoticias.pt/especiais/caso-maddie---10-anos/2020-06-03-Caso-Maddie-Parecem-nao-estar-ainda-bem-seguros-relativamente-a-provas-concretas

Video Transcript:
CC – We just recently had the anniversary marking the disappearance of Maddie McCann. Over the years, occasionally some suspects emerge, it shouldn’t be forgotten that the English police works with quite a high financial budget, what I mean by this is that it is possible to use informants, to pay to informants, to see if the police can gather criminal intelligence. Therefore, I would not be surprised that the case, this case of the German man, that is detained, in jail, is also a case stemming from intelligence collected by the BKA [German Police acronym for Bundeskriminalamt]. However, we do not know what the reliability of that information is; note that the communiqué of the German police is broad, but simultaneously also looks to grasp at something more, it speaks of vehicles, two vehicles, speaks of the stay of this individual in the area of Portimão. So, they do not seem to be very sure about concrete evidence.
_____________________________________________________________________
RP – Carlos do Carmo, thank you so much for coming to the night edition with your views about this situation. Have a very good night.

// Translation by J.M. for the Textusa sisters //

*****

Comment from the blog:

A huge thank you to Joana!

We would like to highlight the date of this interview: June 4. This was on the next day after this story broke out on the evening of June 3.

You do care. You very obviously care. You wouldn't keep on about how the PJ should have investigated paedophiles otherwise. So you tell me. What was the reasonable suspicion against Brueckner on the day of May 4th, or any other day thereafter?  So far as I can see, if we're honest & objective about the matter here, the only indication of Brueckner's possible involvement didn't materialise until a kite festival in 2008, and even then, the witness decided this disturbing confession, of an horrific criminal offence against an innocent minor, was best kept secret from the police for a while thereafter.