The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Wonderfulspam]

Against who ? any one who suggests CB is the alleged abductor ?

No, it's not libel if you implicate Brueckner, or the three burglars apparently, ask Brietta, she knows. It's only libellous when you suggest the McCanns. Everyone else is fair game.

[Eleanor]

Against who ? any one who suggests CB is the alleged abductor ?

Libellous Innuendo against The McCanns.

Brueckner is not my problem, although I have never accused him of anything that has not already been proven.

[Wonderfulspam]

Libellous Innuendo against The McCanns.

Brueckner is not my problem, although I have never accused him of anything that has not already been proven.

Yes we know, you're only concerned about libel when it involves the McCanns. This is quite clear to anyone who visits the forum.

[Eleanor]

Yes we know, you're only concerned about libel when it involves the McCanns. This is quite clear to anyone who visits the forum.

Good.

[barrier]

What evidence is there that CB got into 5a and opened the window which is not open ?

[G-Unit]

Exactly.  A piece of cake in fact.  Excepting of course that no one was expecting an abduction.  Well, you don't, do you.  Although most of us would nowadays, because it happened.

Abduction of Madeleine from her bed was assumed by Madeleine's parents. Other theories do exist.

[Eleanor]

Abduction of Madeleine from her bed was assumed by Madeleine's parents. Other theories do exist.

These other theories are Libellous since there is No Proof that The McCanns harmed their daughter.

[Wonderfulspam]

These other theories are Libellous since there is No Proof that The McCanns harmed their daughter.

Well if there was proof, then it wouldn't be theory, would it.

Doesn't that go without saying?

[Eleanor]

Well if there was proof, then it wouldn't be theory, would it.

Doesn't that go without saying?

I have a Theory about you.  But you wouldn't like it.

[G-Unit]

These other theories are Libellous since there is No Proof that The McCanns harmed their daughter.

The ECHR has ruled that Amaral was entitled to share his theory. Mark Williams-Thomas has also proposed his own theory repeatedly. Neither have accused the parents of harming their daughter, and it's time people stopped claiming that as if it was a fact.

[John]

Exactly.  A piece of cake in fact.  Excepting of course that no one was expecting an abduction.  Well, you don't, do you.  Although most of us would nowadays, because it happened.

There is no excuse for complacency when on holiday. Parents must keep their guard up at all times.

Anyone could have sneaked into the McCann's holiday apartment that night completely unseen. In fact somebody did if one chooses to believe the abduction from the bedroom theory. Personally I still believe Madeleine was taken from the street outside after she escaped from the unsecured apartment via the patio door.

We know that Gerry McCann stood conversing with Jeremy Wilkins on the street below the patio steps a short time after checking on the children. Madeleine could well have been disturbed as he left the apartment and heard them chatting outside and decided to pursue for all we know.

The sad thing though is that we may never know what actually occurred or if Bruckner was involved at all to any extent.

[Brietta]

There is no excuse for complacency when on holiday. Parents must keep their guard up at all times.

Anyone could have sneaked into the McCann's holiday apartment that night completely unseen. In fact somebody did if one chooses to believe the abduction from the bedroom theory. Personally I still believe Madeleine was taken from the street outside after she escaped from the unsecured apartment via the patio door.

We know that Gerry McCann stood conversing with Jeremy Wilkins on the street below the patio steps a short time after checking on the children. Madeleine could well have been disturbed as he left the apartment and heard them chatting outside and decided to pursue for all we know.

The sad thing though is that we may never know what actually occurred or if Bruckner was involved at all to any extent.

I think the one thing we can be certain sure of is that even if Brueckner knows chapter and verse what happened to Madeleine he will never give up the power the knowledge would give him.

The only thing which will prevail against Brueckner is if the evidence there is against him is strong enough to charge him and get a conviction.

[John]

I think the one thing we can be certain sure of is that even if Brueckner knows chapter and verse what happened to Madeleine he will never give up the power the knowledge would give him.

The only thing which will prevail against Brueckner is if the evidence there is against him is strong enough to charge him and get a conviction.

I think we would know about it by now if there was such evidence.

[Brietta]

I think we would know about it by now if there was such evidence.

We know there is evidence against Brueckner or the Portuguese penal code would not have allowed him to be constituted Arguido.

What it is we have no idea, but having waited fifteen years for it I don't think it unreasonable to wait just a little longer.

[G-Unit]

We know there is evidence against Brueckner or the Portuguese penal code would not have allowed him to be constituted Arguido.

What it is we have no idea, but having waited fifteen years for it I don't think it unreasonable to wait just a little longer.

Is there any evidence showing this change in the Portuguese penal code?