The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Vertigo Swirl]

John [Name removed] lead investigator confirms it on the Wilson and Fox thingy, ch4, footsteps of killers, one of the others being, evidence from the first investigation was either lost, misplaced or not used.

Come again?  That's not a cite, that's a jumble of words.

[barrier]

cite?

22 minutes in, JD says that a file was presented to the CPS a judge told them that in order to proceed there had been abuse of process on two counts, trial by media so no fair trial and the evidence  ignored, mislaid or did not use  they had in 1986.

[Vertigo Swirl]

22 minutes in, JD says that a file was presented to the CPS a judge told them that in order to proceed there had been abuse of process on two counts, trial by media so no fair trial and the evidence  ignored, mislaid or did not use  they had in 1986.

22 minutes in what?  Who is JD? How come Stephen Lawrence's murderers were found guilty despite "trial by media"?

[G-Unit]

Another reason to think Wolters must be very sure of his guilt

Wolters may not be so sure about what human rights laws say.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters may not be so sure about what human rights laws say.

Do you really think he doesn't understand the law. If you were publicly accused and was innocent...would you not take all the action you could. Why is CB saying nothing and not taking action
Could be Wolters wants him too.


I totally respect the rule of law...so CB should take action...do you have a reason why he isnt

[barrier]

22 minutes in what?  Who is JD? How come Stephen Lawrence's murderers were found guilty despite "trial by media"?

His name was edited out, because its classed as rude by some bot, John D i c k i e, ch4 In the footsteps of killers.
Series 1 episode 2.

You'll have to ask some one in charge why the killers of S lawrence were brought to book.

[Vertigo Swirl]

His name was edited out, because its classed as rude by some bot, John D i c k i e, ch4 In the footsteps of killers.
Series 1 episode 2.

You'll have to ask some one in charge why the killers of S lawrence were brought to book.

Who’s he?

[barrier]

Who’s he?

Led the second investigation in to Lamplughs disappearance.

[Eleanor]

Wolters may not be so sure about what human rights laws say.

This is just not possible.  No Nation knows more about Human Rights than The Germans.

[Vertigo Swirl]

His name was edited out, because its classed as rude by some bot, John D i c k i e, ch4 In the footsteps of killers.
Series 1 episode 2.

You'll have to ask some one in charge why the killers of S lawrence were brought to book.

I'm asking you.  It seems it is not cut and dried.  Lawrence's killers were branded murderers on the front page of a national newspaper, no ifs or buts.  Their case went to trial and they were convicted.  If there had been incontrovertible DNA evidence in the Lamplugh case that pointed to Canaan I'm pretty sure the CPS would have taken it to trial too but we will never know.  On a spearate note, why the hell isn't he dead yet?! He was supposed to be on his death bed about a year ago...

[barrier]

I'm asking you.  It seems it is not cut and dried.  Lawrence's killers were branded murderers on the front page of a national newspaper, no ifs or buts.  Their case went to trial and they were convicted.  If there had been incontrovertible DNA evidence in the Lamplugh case that pointed to Canaan I'm pretty sure the CPS would have taken it to trial too but we will never know.  On a spearate note, why the hell isn't he dead yet?! He was supposed to be on his death bed about a year ago...

On the separate note, a newspaper came out with that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

On the separate note, a newspaper came out with that.

yes, and?  Are you saying it's untrue?

[barrier]

yes, and?  Are you saying it's untrue?

Well if he's still living ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well if he's still living ?

he could have been faking it in the hopes of getting released…?

[G-Unit]

This is just not possible.  No Nation knows more about Human Rights than The Germans.

I wonder if you can support that statement with facts or a cite? I very much doubt it.