The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[kizzy]

Yes got in another plug for her book.

Is she a detective?  No she isn't.   She doesn't have a clue about forensics.   I've watched a lot of programmes where they compare soil,  they were looking for a specific soil by the look of it.

As for CB's comment 'she didn't scream'   it depends on how he said it.   Did he say it as if he was amazed she didn't scream when someone entered the bedroom or did he say it knowing she didn't scream.

I think she should step away from the McCann case.  She is one bitter woman.

I've watched a lot of programmes where they compare soil,  they were looking for a specific soil by the look of it.

So what do you think that will solve....... surely not to prove he went regularly because it was his favorite place.

[Wonderfulspam]

I am so tired of this hypocrisy.  No quarter for The McCanns but every quarter for a paedophile and a rapist.  Who are you people?  What are you trying to do?  And probably more to the point, why are you trying to do this?  Were your own lives so awful?

My own childhood was pretty abysmal, but never have I allowed that to colour my life and what I think of anyone.
And so I simply don't understand why you should think these things without any evidence at all.

'Without any evidence at all"

Why do you continually post this outright lie? There isn't 'no evidence at all' that implicates the McCanns. Martin Smith believed he saw Gerry. That is evidence.

[Brietta]

What?  Good God.  This is more awful than even I thought.

There is justification for supporting the rights of even the most despicable creatures on earth.  It is what makes us civilised human beings.
I've been observing mans' inhumanity to man as a result of this case for many years now both in word and deed  and nothing surprises me any more.

I think it is the realisation that there are people who know none of the main players including the child, who really do not want either this little girl or her human remains to be found.  Not only do I find that reprehensible, I think it is a sin.

[Wonderfulspam]

I've watched a lot of programmes where they compare soil,  they were looking for a specific soil by the look of it.

So what do you think that will solve....... surely not to prove he went regularly because it was his favorite place.

I know right. If soil analysis matches soil found in Brueckner's van, that will prove he went to his little piece of paradise. Quite how that's supposed to advance the Maddie case is anyone's guess really.

[Brietta]

Try facing facts for a change. They became public figures due to their cooperation with the media, as did Wolters.

On both counts your posted opinion is factually incorrect.

[Brietta]

It depends what 'the court of public opinion' is. It's nothing to do with what anonymous people on forums say imo. Central to it is the media, which was used extensively by the McCanns and by Wolters to get their messages across to the public.

What a mix max that post is.

Have you really forgotten that the German prosecutor's "message to the public" was a plea for information to help solve the obscenity of the heinous crime of child murder.

[G-Unit]

That's an opinion. The McCanns may already know the truth, hence the reason they insist Maddie was abducted.

That's the problem. The choice is clear; whether to believe what the McCanns say or to wonder. There are those who wholeheartedly believe the McCanns and there are others who, for various reasons, wonder. Neither group can prove what actually happened on 3rd May 2007.

We have a similar situation now with CB. We have a prosecutor who has done his utmost to convince the world that he has found the murderer of MM, but so far no attempt to prove his allegations in a court of law.

[G-Unit]

What a mix max that post is.

Have you really forgotten that the German prosecutor's "message to the public" was a plea for information to help solve the obscenity of the heinous crime of child murder.

I was perhaps diverted by his efforts to convince us that he knew who did it.

[Wonderfulspam]

That's the problem. The choice is clear; whether to believe what the McCanns say or to wonder. There are those who wholeheartedly believe the McCanns and there are others who, for various reasons, wonder. Neither group can prove what actually happened on 3rd May 2007.

We have a similar situation now with CB. We have a prosecutor who has done his utmost to convince the world that he has found the murderer of MM, but so far no attempt to prove his allegations in a court of law.

The task for Wolters is straightforward enough. Prove the McCanns didn't do it, by proving Brueckner did. I can quite easily see the problem he is having with that.

[Mr Gray]

I've watched a lot of programmes where they compare soil,  they were looking for a specific soil by the look of it.

So what do you think that will solve....... surely not to prove he went regularly because it was his favorite place.

I doubt anyone on any forum understands what he hopes to find

[Mr Gray]

That's the problem. The choice is clear; whether to believe what the McCanns say or to wonder. There are those who wholeheartedly believe the McCanns and there are others who, for various reasons, wonder. Neither group can prove what actually happened on 3rd May 2007.

We have a similar situation now with CB. We have a prosecutor who has done his utmost to convince the world that he has found the murderer of MM, but so far no attempt to prove his allegations in a court of law.

Don't forget Amaral and his followers claiming he's not only innocent in thecCann case but also in the DM rape too

[G-Unit]

Don't forget Amaral and his followers claiming he's not only innocent in thecCann case but also in the DM rape too

I listen to what others say, but I don't see how that relates to the media fests instigated by the McCanns and Wolters.

[Lace]

I've watched a lot of programmes where they compare soil,  they were looking for a specific soil by the look of it.

So what do you think that will solve....... surely not to prove he went regularly because it was his favorite place.

It's something a forensic scientist would want to check.   For instance if CB had been digging and he trod on soil that he had dug up,  then something was found in that soil,  then it would prove that he had buried it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's the problem. The choice is clear; whether to believe what the McCanns say or to wonder. There are those who wholeheartedly believe the McCanns and there are others who, for various reasons, wonder. Neither group can prove what actually happened on 3rd May 2007.

We have a similar situation now with CB. We have a prosecutor who has done his utmost to convince the world that he has found the murderer of MM, but so far no attempt to prove his allegations in a court of law.

”Wondering”.  Is that what they’re calling it these days?  Lol

[G-Unit]

”Wondering”.  Is that what they’re calling it these days?  Lol

Call it what you like, but there are people who do it.