Author Topic: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner  (Read 97178 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #555 on: June 11, 2023, 10:11:51 PM »
Somehow HCW/BKA managed to find enough evidence to warrant a MLA application to Portugal requesting permission to search Barragem do Arade. The application was granted by the Portuguese AG so the evidence must have been pretty compelling, given that elements in Portugal still believe McCannsdunit.

Not really. If the BKA receive 'certain tips' & 'credible information' against the prolific sex offender, it would be remiss of the Portuguese not to allow a search of his little paradise. The information, evidence, call it what you will, may in fact be totally useless. And Wolters can't see himself pressing charges any time in the foreseeable future, so that tells us all we need to know about how much use the search was really.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #556 on: June 12, 2023, 01:51:45 AM »
Cue Amaral's comments on the subject.

I am noticing a bit of movement in Portuguese opinion with a bit more openness to questioning.  Amaral continues digging a huge hole for himself and his pronouncements are even more wired to the moon than ever.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #557 on: June 12, 2023, 08:24:20 AM »
I am noticing a bit of movement in Portuguese opinion with a bit more openness to questioning.  Amaral continues digging a huge hole for himself and his pronouncements are even more wired to the moon than ever.

Amaral again?



Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #558 on: June 12, 2023, 08:30:00 AM »
Amaral again?

Well, he is trying to interfere with the Evidence Against Brueckner.  Which I find to be very odd indeed.

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #559 on: June 12, 2023, 09:01:16 AM »
Amaral again?

Absolutely Amaral from before - Amaral from start - Amaral throughout - Amaral today and Amaral tomorrow with a finger in every pie - and why it all hasn't come back to bite him on the bum -- yet -- is one of the biggest mysteries in the Brueckner case.


Maddie case. PJ investigation was "at least irresponsible", warns jurist
May 25, 2023
President of the Association of Missing Children points out "glaring errors" in the investigation coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral. If the new searches at the Arade dam confirm failures, the PJ "has to justify them and penitentiate themselves, so that they are not repeated."

Then there was an unshakable thesis," he adds, referring to the fact that the Portuguese line of research followed the thesis of the exclusive responsibility of the parents in the disappearance of the girl.

PatrĂ­cia Cipriano criticizes this orientation, relying on a fundamental rule in criminal investigation: "There are no unshakable theses, unless the evidence is very secure", which, in the opinion of this jurist, did not happen.

"It is normal that in the case of the disappearance of a child, the first suspects are the parents, they are always investigated. But to base an entire investigation on a certain preconceived idea, which has no proof to support this thesis is, at the very least, irresponsible," he criticizes.
https://rr.sapo.pt/noticia/pais/2023/05/25/caso-maddie-investigacao-da-pj-foi-no-minimo-irresponsavel-alerta-jurista/332742/
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #560 on: June 12, 2023, 09:11:21 AM »
Well, he is trying to interfere with the Evidence Against Brueckner.  Which I find to be very odd indeed.

He is at the forefront of meddling in a way that very few civilised countries in the world could or would tolerate.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #561 on: June 12, 2023, 09:22:39 AM »
I think that a core of The Portuguese People were and are not in agreement with Amaral or The Investigation, but they were too afraid to say so, apart from a couple of well known Portuguese Aficionados who The PJ would not have dared to attack.  But then we have all read these articles and seen the videos, some of which were really funny.  And we all now know what happened to any ordinary citizens who were foolish enough to disagree.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #562 on: June 12, 2023, 09:24:29 AM »
He is at the forefront of meddling in a way that very few civilised countries in the world could or would tolerate.

But still it goes on.  Why is Portugal still doing nothing about this?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #563 on: June 12, 2023, 09:37:16 AM »
Well, he is trying to interfere with the Evidence Against Brueckner.  Which I find to be very odd indeed.

But Wolters says the evidence against Christian Brueckner is 100% convincing, & if only you knew what it was, you too would be in no doubt. Nothing Amaral can do or say will alter that.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #564 on: June 12, 2023, 09:51:27 AM »
Well, he is trying to interfere with the Evidence Against Brueckner.  Which I find to be very odd indeed.

He is enjoying the freedom of speech which we are all entitled to.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #565 on: June 12, 2023, 10:16:11 AM »

MWT travelled around Luz & Germany interviewing Brueckner's associates, witnesses, if you will. He put out a documentary which cast doubt on the concrete evidence. Could it also be said that MWT has interfered with an active investigation?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #566 on: June 12, 2023, 10:24:06 AM »
He is enjoying the freedom of speech which we are all entitled to.

Tell that to Julian Assange.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #567 on: June 12, 2023, 10:24:56 AM »
He is enjoying the freedom of speech which we are all entitled to.

Along with Libel and Interfering With The Course of Justice.  At least, in Portugal.  Not to forget Perjury, of course.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #568 on: June 12, 2023, 10:48:19 AM »
Along with Libel and Interfering With The Course of Justice.  At least, in Portugal.  Not to forget Perjury, of course.

Justice was perverted the moment Wolters called Brueckner a murderer. What about Christian Brueckner's Rights? Wolters hasn't mentioned Amaral Interfering With anything. The only people who complain about it frequently are you & Brietta.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #569 on: June 12, 2023, 11:08:52 AM »
He is enjoying the freedom of speech which we are all entitled to.
Do you think he is observing the following duties and responsibilities?
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".