Author Topic: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner  (Read 111887 times)

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #570 on: June 12, 2023, 11:19:43 AM »
Do you think he is observing the following duties and responsibilities?
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

A mere bagatelle.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #571 on: June 12, 2023, 11:29:50 AM »
Do you think he is observing the following duties and responsibilities?
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

That's not a question I can answer really. I think he probably knows the law very well, as demonstrated by the fact that the McCanns and their multitude of lawyers failed miserably despite relentlessly pursuing him though the courts.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #572 on: June 12, 2023, 01:06:42 PM »
That's not a question I can answer really. I think he probably knows the law very well, as demonstrated by the fact that the McCanns and their multitude of lawyers failed miserably despite relentlessly pursuing him though the courts.
I’m not surprised you claim not to be able to answer when it’s so blatantly obvious Amaral does not respect the duties and responsibilities that come with free speech.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #573 on: June 12, 2023, 01:08:51 PM »
That's not a question I can answer really. I think he probably knows the law very well, as demonstrated by the fact that the McCanns and their multitude of lawyers failed miserably despite relentlessly pursuing him though the courts.

He wasn't too hot on the law whe he failed miserably in his case against Correia

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #574 on: June 12, 2023, 01:09:36 PM »
I’m not surprised you claim not to be able to answer when it’s so blatantly obvious Amaral does not respect the duties and responsibilities that come with free speech.

Or those that come with being a Police Officer.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #575 on: June 12, 2023, 01:31:48 PM »
I’m not surprised you claim not to be able to answer when it’s so blatantly obvious Amaral does not respect the duties and responsibilities that come with free speech.

So many things are blatantly obvious to those who rely on their own opinions, aren't they?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #576 on: June 12, 2023, 02:20:27 PM »
So many things are blatantly obvious to those who rely on their own opinions, aren't they?
that’s a meaningless question but it deflects from you having to give a meaningful answer, as usual.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #577 on: June 12, 2023, 04:31:39 PM »
That's not a question I can answer really. I think he probably knows the law very well, as demonstrated by the fact that the McCanns and their multitude of lawyers failed miserably despite relentlessly pursuing him though the courts.
Brueckner appears to have a multitude of lawyers at the beck and and call of whoever is paying for them.  Difference being he is an habitual criminal with convictions for drug dealing and trafficking, child abuse, rape and is suspected of child murder.  Kate, Gerry and  Madeleine are victims of crime.

Your posts are a joy to behold really; I for one find them a hoot.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #578 on: June 12, 2023, 04:45:28 PM »
Brueckner appears to have a multitude of lawyers at the beck and and call of whoever is paying for them.  Difference being he is an habitual criminal with convictions for drug dealing and trafficking, child abuse, rape and is suspected of child murder.  Kate, Gerry and  Madeleine are victims of crime.

Your posts are a joy to behold really; I for one find them a hoot.

I wish I did.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #579 on: June 12, 2023, 06:29:40 PM »
Brueckner appears to have a multitude of lawyers at the beck and and call of whoever is paying for them.  Difference being he is an habitual criminal with convictions for drug dealing and trafficking, child abuse, rape and is suspected of child murder. Kate, Gerry and  Madeleine are victims of crime.

Your posts are a joy to behold really; I for one find them a hoot.

Kate & Gerry are alleged victims of crime. As things stand, no crime has been proven.
There, I fixed it for you.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #580 on: June 12, 2023, 06:33:39 PM »
Kate & Gerry are alleged victims of crime. As things stand, no crime has been proven.
There, I fixed it for you.

Furthermore, they could in fact be the perpetrators of a crime against Madeleine. There's no way to be certain that they're not really.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #581 on: June 12, 2023, 07:22:19 PM »
Brueckner appears to have a multitude of lawyers at the beck and and call of whoever is paying for them.  Difference being he is an habitual criminal with convictions for drug dealing and trafficking, child abuse, rape and is suspected of child murder.  Kate, Gerry and  Madeleine are victims of crime.

Your posts are a joy to behold really; I for one find them a hoot.

It seems to rankle that CB has lawyers. Do you think that those with prior convictions shouldn't have them?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #582 on: June 12, 2023, 07:33:40 PM »
It seems to rankle that CB has lawyers. Do you think that those with prior convictions shouldn't have them?
It certainly seems to rankle some that the McCanns have lawyers, you can tell which ones are rankled, the ones that use terms like “multitudes of lawyers”.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #583 on: June 12, 2023, 08:08:35 PM »
It certainly seems to rankle some that the McCanns have lawyers, you can tell which ones are rankled, the ones that use terms like “multitudes of lawyers”.

Well they certainly had a lot, didn't they?

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner
« Reply #584 on: June 12, 2023, 08:12:33 PM »
Well they certainly had a lot, didn't they?

If you'd have said 'numerous lawyers' maybe no one would have been rankled?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club