Author Topic: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.  (Read 39618 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #165 on: January 20, 2023, 05:54:10 PM »
Why do you want to know?

Curiosity. Is it investigating the disappearance or is it concentrating solely on getting a conviction on Brueckner, which is not necessarily the same thing.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Anthro

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #166 on: January 20, 2023, 05:55:03 PM »
Did you know that investigations in Germany take place under the supervision and instructions of prosecutors?
Yes. And?

Offline Anthro

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #167 on: January 20, 2023, 05:58:01 PM »
Curiosity. Is it investigating the disappearance or is it concentrating solely on getting a conviction on Brueckner, which is not necessarily the same thing.
I suggest you do your own research to find the answer to your question.

Offline jassi

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #168 on: January 20, 2023, 05:59:19 PM »
I suggest you do your own research to find the answer to your question.

So you don't know.  Fair enough.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline sadie

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #169 on: January 20, 2023, 06:11:40 PM »
Well there's no evidence Madeleine was abducted for starters.

YAWN........... 6&%5%


AGAIN 
Every time you repeat your brain washing mantra (Cos its purpose is to brain wash people definitely, I will post my answer, probably adding extra bits as I go along

Quote
Sadie quote
Ok, you have challenged this WS


Just a few pointers, clues for the discerning. who are willing to consider.[/u]

1.  Witness Jane Tanner saw a man hurrying off with a ?sleeping girl who matched Madeleines description.

2.  Witness Kate saw the open window.
     Witness Matt saw a strange greenish light coming from the (closed curtained) shutter area.  Was the shutter raised already and the sickly yellowish street light mixed its colour with the blue curtains, making green?  Had Madeleine already gone ?   Yellow and blue mixed makes green.

I think that directed from the balcony opposite, the watcher thinking that GErry was gone completely, ordered the go ahead immediately.   Then too late, Witness Jane appeared.  The director of operations was already in the getaway car by then, which he could access by the rear garden of the balcony and flat block
 
3. Several different  Witnesses saw a certain man watching 5A.  One Witness, Tasmin Silence, saw him on two seperate days.       He was WATCHING 5A.   In fact, the once he was really close up, leaning against the garden wall and peering in.

4)  There were fag ends on the balcony of the block immediately opposite 5A.   
From this balcony a watcher/abduction director could see the area immediately before both front and rear doors and to  the routes up to and away from 5A.  He could see all around, both roads.  In fact, apert from southwards on the eastern pavement and little car park opposite Tapas reception, he could see everywhere including the Tapas restaurant.  I believe he could see them eating.

And he could see straight into 5A and see anyone walking towards, or away, from Madeleines bedroom, and the front door and the patio doors, because the sitting room light was left on.

He himself could vanish into the shadow of Block 6, which was cast by the street lamp obliquely outside.    Or just duck down behind the balcony.   What an amazing viewing point

5)   A limousine,which IIRC was black, was seen driving up by Baptista Supermarket at the pertinent time that Kate and Gerry suddenly appeared out of 5A en route for the restaurant.   This limousine suddenly made a three point turn and drove off away from the viewing area.    ?Frightened of being seen by Kate and Gerry?   For a couple of witnesses to have noticed this, the three point turn must have been very hurried and rough IMO.  Maybe panicky?

6)  Parents who had criminally vanished their own child would NOT lobby, as the Mccanns did, for Scotland Yard to be brought in.



THINK about it WS.   Had you done it, would YOU bring in Scotland Yard if you were guilty?


John, please note:   If WS can keep repeating accusations and stuff ad nausium, then I claim the right to repeatedly post my offering.   Fair is fair.  Right?



John,    Why was I not allowed to post this last night?   I have a feeling that most, if not all, of my observations are correct so the wish is that my post vanishes into the ether.  This sort of thing has happened before.   Also a virus/ malware was foisted on to my computer.   Please make sure this stops.   I don't want to have to contact David Cameron.   He acted last time, remember?

Offline Anthro

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #170 on: January 20, 2023, 06:42:36 PM »
So you don't know.  Fair enough.
Jassi, please get off my case. You are deliberately provocative by asking me what I know about the investigation.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #171 on: January 20, 2023, 07:25:01 PM »
Yes. And?

It may not be Wolters, but a prosecutor will be involved in Operation Rechen.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #172 on: January 20, 2023, 07:28:05 PM »
What exactly is Operation Rechen investigating ?

Google returns zilch
« Last Edit: January 20, 2023, 07:30:37 PM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline barrier

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #173 on: January 20, 2023, 07:54:29 PM »
What exactly is Operation Rechen investigating ?

Google returns zilch

According to this, information, caveat press and google translate.

https://regionalheute.de/fall-maddie-braunschweig-gar-nicht-zustaendig-braunschweig-gifhorn-goslar-harz-helmstedt-peine-salzgitter-wolfenbuettel-wolfsburg-1674209768/

Maddie is still wanted

Then 3-year-old Madeleine "Maddie" McCann disappeared from a hotel room in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on May 3, 2007. The girl is still being searched for. In Germany, too, a public search is still being carried out by the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) and the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office. A reward of 10,000 euros is being offered for information leading to the investigation of the crime. The BKA takes tips on 0 611/55-18444 or any other police station.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Anthro

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #174 on: January 20, 2023, 08:24:54 PM »
What exactly is Operation Rechen investigating ?

Google returns zilch
Christian Brückner. Best you read Amaral’s second book.

Offline Anthro

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #175 on: January 20, 2023, 08:27:16 PM »
It may not be Wolters, but a prosecutor will be involved in Operation Rechen.
Yes, Ute Lindemann comes to mind.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #176 on: January 21, 2023, 08:28:14 AM »
Yes, Ute Lindemann comes to mind.

That name rings a bell from earlier in the investigation. Quite possibly Wolters was just the spokesman, and boy did he speak!
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #177 on: January 21, 2023, 08:33:28 AM »
That name rings a bell from earlier in the investigation. Quite possibly Wolters was just the spokesman, and boy did he speak!
Still in a job though isn’t he, despite the claims on here that he was a loose cannon, a maverick, and predictions  that he would be sued or sacked.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #178 on: January 21, 2023, 08:59:08 AM »
Still in a job though isn’t he, despite the claims on here that he was a loose cannon, a maverick, and predictions  that he would be sued or sacked.

Who ever said that though? Certainly not me. I always believed Wolters was appealing for information, an approved tactical move. Testing Brueckner on his confession & trying to flush out his mystery accomplice. At the same time, by linking Brueckner to Maddie, Wolters gained maximum publicity, &, as with Hazel B, his victims of other unrelated crimes felt compelled to come forward. Anyway, Brueckner will be doing porridge for many years to come, so well done Wolters. Bad luck to him on Maddie case though. You can't win them all.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.
« Reply #179 on: January 21, 2023, 10:29:12 AM »
Still in a job though isn’t he, despite the claims on here that he was a loose cannon, a maverick, and predictions  that he would be sued or sacked.

Who called him a loose cannon or a maverick? Who said he was going to be sacked? You're not exaggerating are you? One of the reasons Brueckner's lawyer is trying to get the trial moved away from Braunschweig is because he believes a fair trial isn't possible there, and has already submitted a written complaint about statements being made which prejudged the outcome. A reprimand could be issued, which could be used as the basis for an appeal if Brueckner was convicted.
https://regionalheute.de/fall-maddie-braunschweig-gar-nicht-zustaendig-braunschweig-gifhorn-goslar-harz-helmstedt-peine-salzgitter-wolfenbuettel-wolfsburg-1674209768/

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0