The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.

[jassi]

So Smithman is only evidence if he's Gerry carrying a (dead) Madeleine but not if he's an unidentified man carrying a child who resembled Madeleine? Righty-ho...

Never mentioned Gerry. Read more carefully next time.

[misty]

Never mentioned Gerry. Read more carefully next time.

I know you didn't mention Gerry. Smithman being Gerry is crucial to the PJ hypothesis, though - so when is evidence not actually evidence?

[Eleanor]

I know you didn't mention Gerry. Smithman being Gerry is crucial to the PJ hypothesis, though - so when is evidence not actually evidence?

When it can't be Proven.  Which it cannot.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Never mentioned Gerry. Read more carefully next time.

But you never actually remark that "Smithman isn't evidence Gerry dumped Madeleine a bin, only evidence of some yet unidentified man carrying a small child" do you?  Odd that...

[Wonderfulspam]

When it can't be Proven.  Which it cannot.

So you'd agree there's no evidence Madeleine was abducted?

[sadie]

So you'd agree there's no evidence Madeleine was abducted?

Loads of pointers that in other cases would be considered evidence

But for some strange reason, in this case, they are are not



I wonder why there is a different set of rules for this case?



Have you forgotten the list of pointers, I gave you, WS?   So soon.   

Why, WS ?    What's the reason?   

[Wonderfulspam]

Loads of pointers that in other cases would be considered evidence

But for some strange reason, in this case, they are are not



I wonder why there is a different set of rules for this case?



Have you forgotten the list of pointers, I gave you, WS?   So soon.   

Why, WS ?    What's the reason?

No, your pointers are not evidence. Furthermore, evidence is only evidence when it can be proven, according to misty & Eleanor.

[sadie]

No, your pointers are not evidence. Furthermore, evidence is only evidence when it can be proven, according to misty & Eleanor.

Jane Tanners sighting is evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

My video is extremely strong evidence that Madeleine still lived in 2012.   A moving picture of her over a period.

Psychics all agreeing that Madeleine still lives.   They know when someone dies.

[Wonderfulspam]

Jane Tanners sighting is evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

My video is extremely strong evidence that Madeleine still lived in 2012.   A moving picture of her over a period.

Psychics all agreeing that Madeleine still lives.   They know when someone dies.

No, I'm sorry sadie. Derek Acorah's spirit guide, Sam, said Madeleine is dead. The evidence against Christian B confirms that. Derek Acorah is now dead too. I wonder if he saw that coming?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-is-dead-derek-acorah-833385

[Mr Gray]

No, I'm sorry sadie. Derek Acorah's spirit guide, Sam, said Madeleine is dead. The evidence against Christian B confirms that. Derek Acorah is now dead too. I wonder if he saw that coming?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-is-dead-derek-acorah-833385

Talking if BS..
I've heard Grimes trained a new dog that detects BS....he's having difficulty using him though because every time Grime goes near him he won't stop barking

[G-Unit]

Jane Tanners sighting is evidence that Madeleine was abducted.

My video is extremely strong evidence that Madeleine still lived in 2012.   A moving picture of her over a period.

Psychics all agreeing that Madeleine still lives.   They know when someone dies.

Jane Tanner saw a man carrying a child, that's all. Your video showed a child you thought looked like Madeleine, just as thousands of other people thought they saw her. Psychic's opinions have no evidential value.

[Mr Gray]

Jane Tanner saw a man carrying a child, that's all. Your video showed a child you thought looked like Madeleine, just as thousands of other people thought they saw her. Psychic's opinions have no evidential value.

You're absolutely right on this occasion but what you say supports the McCann's.
Martin Smith saw a man carrying a child who he thought could be GN and MM. As reliable as any other sighting

[G-Unit]

You're absolutely right on this occasion but what you say supports the McCann's.
Martin Smith saw a man carrying a child who he thought could be GN and MM. As reliable as any other sighting

What I said shows that Sadie's 'evidence' isn't actually evidence.

[Mr Gray]

What I said shows that Sadie's 'evidence' isn't actually evidence.

Sadie's seeing a video which she thought may be Maddie is evidence...that's fact not opinion. After 15 years you still don't understand what evidence is...which doesn't say a lot for your opinions

[Wonderfulspam]

Sadie's seeing a video which she thought may be Maddie is evidence...that's fact not opinion. After 15 years you still don't understand what evidence is...which doesn't say a lot for your opinions

No, according to Eleanor, & the 4 members who liked her comment, evidence isn't evidence unless it can be proven. Maybe have a chat with your lot about when evidence is & isn't evidence, because they don't understand either.