Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?

[Eleanor]

How do sceptics square the McCanns' scepticism regarding HCW's claims with their own beliefs that the McCanns dunnit?  How in the name of all that is logical and plausible do they explain why the McCanns would refuse to accept the German opinion that Madeleine was murdered by a paedophile when such an opinion gets them completely off the hook wrt to any direct involvement in their daughter's disappearance?

Don't be silly.  Sceptics don't think.  They know The McCanns dunnit and that's the end of that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Don't be silly.  Sceptics don't think.  They know The McCanns dunnit and that's the end of that.

There are certainl things they really don’t like to spend too much time thinking about and this is certainly one of them.  I expect the troll will give some smartarse response but guaranteed it won’t make be either plausible or logical.

[Wonderfulspam]

How do sceptics square the McCanns' scepticism regarding HCW's claims with their own beliefs that the McCanns dunnit?  How in the name of all that is logical and plausible do they explain why the McCanns would refuse to accept the German opinion that Madeleine was murdered by a paedophile when such an opinion gets them completely off the hook wrt to any direct involvement in their daughter's disappearance?

Wolters opinion doesn't get them off the hook. Only evidence can do that, & they know Wolters doesn't really have any. It's the rest of you who still can't figure that out.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Of course there is also the sceptic belief that even if it never comes to court the Germans have done enough to make sure that the public at large will always believe that CB murdered Madeleine.  Nothing short of a full confession by a.n. other supported by evidence is likely to change that official narrative.  Again, why would the McCanns (having allegedly done away with their daughter) seek to cast any doubts whatsoever on this convenient narrative?  Nope, there is no logical answer to that. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course there is also the sceptic belief that even if it never comes to court the Germans have done enough to make sure that the public at large will always believe that CB murdered Madeleine.  Nothing short of a full confession by a.n. other supported by evidence is likely to change that official narrative.  Again, why would the McCanns (having allegedly done away with their daughter) seek to cast any doubts whatsoever on this convenient narrative?  Nope, there is no logical answer to that.

This is the clincher for you is It?
The McCanns must be innocent because they doubt Wolters?
It's almost as daft as davels notion that Brueckner isn't suing, therefore he's guilty.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Like I said, no logical answer just ridicule for something I didn’t actually say or claim.   The very definition of a troll.

[Wonderfulspam]

Like I said, no logical answer just ridicule for something I didn’t actually say or claim.   The very definition of a troll.

The McCanns will NEVER give up the search for Madeleine.What is it you don't understand about that?
Their website continues to state that there is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed. It's going to stay like that until they're both dead & no amount of local burgling Paedophiles will ever change it.

[jassi]

The McCanns will NEVER give up the search for Madeleine.What is it you don't understand about that?
Their website continues to state that there is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed. It's going to stay like that until they're both dead & no amount of local burgling Paedophiles will ever change it.

It'll be interesting to see what happens if CB is convicted of murder.
Will McCann still insist that she came to no harm or will they accept the verdict and that they will have been wrong for close on twenty years?

[Eleanor]

It'll be interesting to see what happens if CB is convicted of murder.
Will McCann still insist that she came to no harm or will they accept the verdict and that they will have been wrong for close on twenty years?

Interesting?  Goodness me.  How sick is that?

[jassi]

Interesting?  Goodness me.  How sick is that?

Not very for anyone not emotionally involved.

[Eleanor]

Not very for anyone not emotionally involved.

So why are you interested?

[Vertigo Swirl]

It'll be interesting to see what happens if CB is convicted of murder.
Will McCann still insist that she came to no harm or will they accept the verdict and that they will have been wrong for close on twenty years?

LOL, what twisted crap is this that you are spouting?  How are the McCanns wrong if a paedophile is convicted of abducting and murdering their child? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

So why are you interested?

Jassi claims not to be emotionally invested but she seems to have forgotten how clear she has made it that she detests the McCanns and wishes them only bad things.  That is being emotionally involved, but she can't even see it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Jassi claims not to be emotionally invested but she seems to have forgotten how clear she has made it that she detests the McCanns and wishes them only bad things.  That is being emotionally involved, but she can't even see it.

When has she said that? I would have clicked like on that post if I'd seen it, & I don't give out many likes.

[jassi]

So why are you interested?

Because it is interesting.
I've no personal involvement with anyone in this case at all, but interested to see how it eventually pans out.
Its of no consequence to me what good/bad things befall people along the way.