Author Topic: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?  (Read 287221 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #885 on: November 24, 2024, 09:59:31 PM »

Anyway. Can we all just leave Christian Brueckner alone now please. He hasn't done anything.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #886 on: November 24, 2024, 10:35:25 PM »
Anyway. Can we all just leave Christian Brueckner alone now please. He hasn't done anything.
Yes, please can we return to the McCanns  because they haven’t been cleared (well ok, neither has Bruckner when it comes to Madeleine’s disappearance but the poor love has suffered quite enough, whereas those McCs haven’t suffered nearly enough).
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #887 on: November 24, 2024, 10:50:42 PM »
Yes, please can we return to the McCanns  because they haven’t been cleared (well ok, neither has Bruckner when it comes to Madeleine’s disappearance but the poor love has suffered quite enough, whereas those McCs haven’t suffered nearly enough).

You're one of the worst culprits. You haven't a single positive thing to say about Christian Brueckner.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #888 on: November 24, 2024, 10:55:06 PM »
You're one of the worst culprits. You haven't a single positive thing to say about Christian Brueckner.
I’ve never met him but he seems like a lovely man, really.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #889 on: November 24, 2024, 10:59:30 PM »
I’ve never met him but he seems like a lovely man, really.

Well, a female witness in his defence did have some good things to say about him & she'd know him better than any of us so yes, maybe he's not such a bad fellow afterall. Anyway, about the McCanns.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #890 on: November 24, 2024, 11:13:06 PM »
Well, a female witness in his defence did have some good things to say about him & she'd know him better than any of us so yes, maybe he's not such a bad fellow afterall. Anyway, about the McCanns.
yes, they seem vile by comparison.  I doubt they’d find anyone in the world to stand up in court with a good word to say about them.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #891 on: November 24, 2024, 11:52:06 PM »
yes, they seem vile by comparison.  I doubt they’d find anyone in the world to stand up in court with a good word to say about them.

Maybe Mrs Gaspar.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #893 on: November 25, 2024, 07:53:33 AM »
Maybe Mrs Gaspar.
. She’s a doctor I do believe and their word does carry weight in court.  Yes she didn’t seem to have a problem with Kate or Gerry and nor did her husband so you may well be right there.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #894 on: November 25, 2024, 10:10:29 AM »
Maybe Mrs Gaspar.
If only Dav were still alive. He'd be all over this like a tramp on chips, no doubt asking us to quantify the likelihood of these lurid acts occurring.
I would, in turn, contend that she had nothing to gain and much to lose, and, just like Martin Smith, probably regrets injecting herself in to this uncanny saga. Neither were lying, both may be mistaken, but Dav, wherever you are up there, what's the likelihood that everyone is lying / mistaken?

Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #895 on: November 25, 2024, 10:15:56 AM »
Deleted
Self-moderation. I like to see it.
Some things are best left un-said.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #896 on: November 25, 2024, 10:22:19 AM »
Self-moderation. I like to see it.
Some things are best left un-said.

A lesson you might care to take note of.

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #897 on: November 25, 2024, 10:36:39 AM »
A lesson you might care to take note of.
I do, which is why my posts are so moderate.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #898 on: November 25, 2024, 10:51:12 AM »
I do, which is why my posts are so moderate.

You have already offended me but I chose to ignore it. I might not do so in future.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #899 on: November 25, 2024, 01:36:06 PM »
Well, I hope this isn't going to turn into another CB thread.....enough already

The only connection it seems he has with Maddie is the word [suspect].

It was surprising to me a lot of acquittances in Spain who I often talked with

Who often read this forum [although never post]

With all the hype of CB threads and lack of info on here About Maddie. that CB had been charged.

Well, He hasn't has he....... or it seems likely to be.



also

Now that the total and repeated falsehood of the claim the McCanns were “not suspects”, and that they had been ‘cleared’ has been specifically rejected first at the Appeal Court, and then by the Supreme Court in Portugal, might it perhaps now be time to consider other things they said




They said they had cooperated fully with the Portuguese police   This was not true

They said they had answered all questions truthfully   This was not true

They said they had not deleted phone messages and records   This was not true

They said they would not leave Portugal until Madeleine was found   This was not true

They said they would take a Lie detector test   This was not true

They said they had not discussed the case with the Tapas 7   This was not true

They said their reputations had been damaged by Dr Amaral’s book   This was not true

They said they were not suspects   This was not true

They said the shelving of the enquiry had ‘cleared’ them of suspicion   This was not true

They said the “Fund” would not be used for legal expenses   This was not true

They said the “Fund” accounts would be transparent and open   This was not true

They said the “Fund” was for searching for Madeleine   This was not true

They said they never called Madeleine - “Maddie”   This was not true

They said they had not placed much emphasis on the coloboma   This was not true



https://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.com/2016/08/this-was-not-true.html