One can read, thank you.
Very few would lower themselves to spit on a rapist and paedophile. If the creature Brueckner is proven to be all that and a child murderer to boot you will have outclassed yourself in your comments.
Brueckner was free and on the loose on May three.
You don't know where he was and what he was doing ... yet again without fail you leap to his defence in almost every post you make.
It really is not a good look to worry about ''a miscarriage of justice'' for the rapist and child molester while throwing buckets of poisonous innuendo at
- all and sundry who are not Bueckner
- while coming up with every excuse in the book and some even Brueckner hadn't thought about yet as you leap to his defence
Do a fact check ... just reread the content of your posts.
One tends to go on the evidence of these things but if the German police, the Met police and the Portuguese police can’t find enough in almost eight years enough of it to even question Brueckner then it probably doesn’t exist. Lest we forget it only took the combined efforts of the Portuguese and German police a few short years to convict him of the rape of Diane Menkes. One hair it took to convict him and they obviously don’t even have that in this case.
For clarity I don’t think that Freud had anything to do with the disappearance of Madeleine but if his offending record had been known about at the time he certainly should have been investigated. Much like Brueckner. The difference is Brueckner has been investigated and after almost eight years the police of three jurisdictions have been unable to find enough evidence even to arrest him.
Brueckner is a vile specimen who I certainly think is safer behind bars but there is, to date, not enough evidence to link him to Madeleine’s disappearance. That’s not supporting or cheerleading for him, that’s simply the truth and it is rather linear thinking on your part to assume that it is.
