Author Topic: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?  (Read 287387 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Myster

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1320 on: February 07, 2025, 08:55:48 AM »
Never been anywhere near Ampleforth in my life!  Not from a Catholic family either!  In fact I've only now just looked it up and wish I'd had the opportunity and good fortune to be educated there...

https://www.ampleforthcollege.org.uk/
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1321 on: February 07, 2025, 03:02:34 PM »
Not sure why my previous post was removed - but would like to know the reason...anyone.


CAN MODERN TECHNOLOGY Reopen the MADELEINE MCCANN CASE? | TRUE CRIME

Wonder if this will ever be used...maybe the mccs could request it....or SY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAX0HSzeCPo

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1322 on: February 07, 2025, 04:34:31 PM »
Not sure why my previous post was removed - but would like to know the reason...anyone.


CAN MODERN TECHNOLOGY Reopen the MADELEINE MCCANN CASE? | TRUE CRIME

Wonder if this will ever be used...maybe the mccs could request it....or SY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAX0HSzeCPo
That was incredibly creepy and uninformative.  Well the first 5 minutes were before I stopped watching.  Let me guess - the videomaker thinks AI will help prove the McCanns dunnit, am I right or am I right?
« Last Edit: February 07, 2025, 05:17:35 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1323 on: February 07, 2025, 05:07:31 PM »
That was incredibly creepy and uninformative.  Well the first 5 minutes were before I stoppeded watching.  Let me guess - the videomaker thinks AI will help prove the McCanns dunnit, am I right or am I right?

 

Well, could be you were right both times -  if you think the mccs dunnit.

I thought more if the mccs wasn't involved it could maybe show who was responsible...its more 50/50

You should have watched it all...at least if it was used it would start from the begining 3/05/07

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1324 on: February 07, 2025, 05:19:30 PM »


Well, could be you were right both times -  if you think the mccs dunnit.

I thought more if the mccs wasn't involved it could maybe show who was responsible...its more 50/50

You should have watched it all...at least if it was used it would start from the begining 3/05/07
As I don’t think the McCanns dunnit I doubt putting their statements through some AI programme will help at all.  Perhaps the Germans could use it to help nail Bruckner though.  That would be good.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1325 on: February 07, 2025, 05:33:57 PM »
Not sure why my previous post was removed - but would like to know the reason...anyone.


CAN MODERN TECHNOLOGY Reopen the MADELEINE MCCANN CASE? | TRUE CRIME

Wonder if this will ever be used...maybe the mccs could request it....or SY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAX0HSzeCPo

I very nearly removed your Comment but decided not to.  Libel would have been my reason.  Please don't do this again.

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1326 on: February 07, 2025, 06:01:14 PM »
I very nearly removed your Comment but decided not to.  Libel would have been my reason.  Please don't do this again.

Ok, thank you for your reply
« Last Edit: February 07, 2025, 06:05:21 PM by kizzy »

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1327 on: February 07, 2025, 06:03:43 PM »
As I don’t think the McCanns dunnit I doubt putting their statements through some AI programme will help at all.  Perhaps the Germans could use it to help nail Bruckner though.  That would be good.

Well it looked to me like a free for all......although it did seem to throw others in the mix.

Offline Brietta

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1328 on: February 07, 2025, 06:09:59 PM »
Sceptics in general do not have a single independent thought in their heads. The narrative has to emanate from the  sick mind of the latest conspiracy theorist in vogue to do what passes for their thinking for them.

To a man/woman they abhorred every penny spent on finding Madelaine McCann but think nothing of their current source of slurs making capital out of a missing child.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1329 on: February 07, 2025, 06:36:51 PM »
Not sure why my previous post was removed - but would like to know the reason...anyone.


CAN MODERN TECHNOLOGY Reopen the MADELEINE MCCANN CASE? | TRUE CRIME

Wonder if this will ever be used...maybe the mccs could request it....or SY


youtube

One has absolutely no idea who the latest cretin pontificating about Madelene McCann might be.

But he's not too bright is he.

Madeleine Mcann's case
DOES NOT NEED TO BE RE-OPENED ... BRITAIN OPENED IT and PORTUGAL RE-OPENED IT IN 2013
« Last Edit: February 07, 2025, 06:41:13 PM by Brietta »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1330 on: February 07, 2025, 06:49:01 PM »
Sceptics in general do not have a single independent thought in their heads. The narrative has to emanate from the  sick mind of the latest conspiracy theorist in vogue to do what passes for their thinking for them.

To a ma, exceptn/woman they abhorred every penny spent on finding Madelaine McCann but think nothing of their current source of slurs making capital out of a missing child.

It never was anything to do with making money, except for Amaral who was already heavily in debt from cheating his brother and not paying common taxes, long before Madeleine went missing. Amaral was convicted of Fraud in 2002.  The rest of what happened remains beyond me.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1331 on: February 07, 2025, 07:37:55 PM »
One has absolutely no idea who the latest cretin pontificating about Madelene McCann might be.

But he's not too bright is he.

Madeleine Mcann's case
DOES NOT NEED TO BE RE-OPENED ... BRITAIN OPENED IT and PORTUGAL RE-OPENED IT IN 2013

Ah, but that’s not proper re-opening is it?  What he means is make the McCanns the subject of the investigation and brush aside any mention of German paedos or any of the inconvenient stuff that is the subject of the official investigation.  That’s basically what all sceptics yearn for and will continue mithering for until their dying breaths, sad plums.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1332 on: February 07, 2025, 07:52:21 PM »
Ah, but that’s not proper re-opening is it?  What he means is make the McCanns the subject of the investigation and brush aside any mention of German paedos or any of the inconvenient stuff that is the subject of the official investigation.  That’s basically what all sceptics yearn for and will continue mithering for until their dying breaths, sad plums.

This isn't ever going to happen.  The McCann's involvement was just the product of Amaral"s diseased mind;  There. has never been an iota of proof.

Offline Brietta

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1333 on: February 07, 2025, 10:00:57 PM »
Ah, but that’s not proper re-opening is it?  What he means is make the McCanns the subject of the investigation and brush aside any mention of German paedos or any of the inconvenient stuff that is the subject of the official investigation.  That’s basically what all sceptics yearn for and will continue mithering for until their dying breaths, sad plums.

You’ve got it in one regarding the limitations of sceptics.
They really don’t have a clue how anything works, particularly a police investigation.

How limited does one have to be before working out that a sexual predator is a credible suspect in a missing child investigation.
Particularly one with a predilection for little girls.
Particularly as he has been the only suspect and one who has not been ruled out of the investigation at any juncture.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1334 on: February 07, 2025, 11:40:37 PM »
This isn't ever going to happen.  The McCann's involvement was just the product of Amaral"s diseased mind;  There. has never been an iota of proof.

Was it the proof or the will that was lacking?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?