Author Topic: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?  (Read 287361 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1365 on: February 09, 2025, 03:59:12 PM »
what sort of forensic evidence proving this do you think might have been destroyed by the 20+ people walking through the apartment that night?

well we will never know what was destroyed .....will we.

The thing is kmcc "knew" that Maddie had been taken straight away.

She  thoughroly searched the apartment [10mins] yet the mccs let everyone in  ......why


Pre-Secured Scenes
The potential for evidence (or crime scene) contamination increases as the number of people entering a crime scene also increases. Once a scene has been secured, the risk of contamination is greatly reduced. However, what about the events which occurred before the scene was secured? How many people entered and left the scene without being recorded as being there?

No, but we can speculate on what sort of forensic evidence you imagine might point to an accidental death following a fall and a cover up by the parents that was lost in the 20 person plus pile on.  Can you give me a “for example”?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1366 on: February 09, 2025, 04:03:41 PM »
By the couch?
If you think Madeleine was hurt by the couch at the time Kate entered the apartment please describe in your opinion the events leading up to that moment and the subsequent ten or fifteen minutes after her discovery.  TIA.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1367 on: February 09, 2025, 04:27:36 PM »
No, but we can speculate on what sort of forensic evidence you imagine might point to an accidental death following a fall and a cover up by the parents that was lost in the 20 person plus pile on.  Can you give me a “for example”?

Ye sure..but I would have thought even you would know...without asking me.



Learn more
If a crime scene is contaminated, valuable forensic evidence like fingerprints, DNA, hair fibers, or other trace evidence can be lost or compromised, potentially weakening a case against a suspect and making it difficult to establish a link between the perpetrator and the crime scene,

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1368 on: February 09, 2025, 04:44:59 PM »
Ye sure..but I would have thought even you would know...without asking me.



Learn more
If a crime scene is contaminated, valuable forensic evidence like fingerprints, DNA, hair fibers, or other trace evidence can be lost or compromised, potentially weakening a case against a suspect and making it difficult to establish a link between the perpetrator and the crime scene,

Right.  DNA, hair fibres, fingerprints- do you think if any of those were found belonging to any of the McCanns in the apartment that this would be suspicious or point to an accidental death and cover up?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1369 on: February 09, 2025, 05:00:12 PM »
Right.  DNA, hair fibres, fingerprints- do you think if any of those were found belonging to any of the McCanns in the apartment that this would be suspicious or point to an accidental death and cover up?

Wait........I thought you thought Maddie was abducted

do you think if any of those were found belonging to any of the McCanns in the apartment that this would be suspicious or point to an accidental death and cover up?

Why not  a so-called  abductor.

Do you think then it would only be mccs DNA ......because no one else was in there...so just let in the 20+

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1370 on: February 09, 2025, 05:36:54 PM »
Wait........I thought you thought Maddie was abducted

do you think if any of those were found belonging to any of the McCanns in the apartment that this would be suspicious or point to an accidental death and cover up?

Why not  a so-called  abductor.

Do you think then it would only be mccs DNA ......because no one else was in there...so just let in the 20+
And I thought you thought the McCanns dunnit which is why my question was if Gerry McCann had found Madeleine dead in the apartment after falling off the sofa or balcony and carried her body through town afterwards what sort of forensic evidence proving this do you think might have been destroyed by the 20+ people walking through the apartment that night?
You imply that the McCanns deliberately allowed 20+ people into the apartment to trample all over the DNA evidence however obviously there would be no DNA evidence worth trampling over if they did it, so basically your criticism is really only valid if you think that DNA evidence of a third party may have been destroyed. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1371 on: February 09, 2025, 05:44:38 PM »
And I thought you thought the McCanns dunnit which is why my question was if Gerry McCann had found Madeleine dead in the apartment after falling off the sofa or balcony and carried her body through town afterwards what sort of forensic evidence proving this do you think might have been destroyed by the 20+ people walking through the apartment that night?
You imply that the McCanns deliberately allowed 20+ people into the apartment to trample all over the DNA evidence however obviously there would be no DNA evidence worth trampling over if they did it, so basically your criticism is really only valid if you think that DNA evidence of a third party may have been destroyed.

I was talking about the so called abductor DNA.

So why you have to go OTT over what you think - I think is just baffelling

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1372 on: February 09, 2025, 06:16:32 PM »
I was talking about the so called abductor DNA.

So why you have to go OTT over what you think - I think is just baffelling
In what way have I gone OTT exactly?  I suspect you find a lot of things “baffelling” Kizzy, never mind.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1373 on: February 09, 2025, 06:43:32 PM »
In what way have I gone OTT exactly?  I suspect you find a lot of things “baffelling” Kizzy, never mind.

Whatever.......but just remember you only reply to the hand.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1374 on: February 09, 2025, 07:17:04 PM »
Whatever.......but just remember you only reply to the hand.
Ah, the face ain’t listenin’.  That explains it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1375 on: February 09, 2025, 08:09:11 PM »
Ah, the face ain’t listenin’.  That explains it.
Hmmm
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline sadie

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1376 on: February 10, 2025, 02:00:53 AM »

Quote
from: Vertigo Swirl on February 09, 2025, 04:44:59 PM

    Right.  DNA, hair fibres, fingerprints- do you think if any of those were found belonging to any of the McCanns in the apartment that this would be suspicious or point to an accidental death and cover up?



Wait........I thought you thought Maddie was abducted

do you think if any of those were found belonging to any of the McCanns in the apartment that this would be suspicious or point to an accidental death and cover up?

Why not  a so-called  abductor.

Do you think then it would only be mccs DNA ......because no one else was in there...so just let in the 20+

Kizzy, finding any of the stuff mentioned by VS would not be suspicious in any way.   The Mccanns were living there, fgs and there were bouind to be traces of them in the apartment.    No need to cover up their own traces.

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1377 on: February 10, 2025, 07:05:17 AM »
If you think Madeleine was hurt by the couch at the time Kate entered the apartment please describe in your opinion the events leading up to that moment and the subsequent ten or fifteen minutes after her discovery.  TIA.
It was a question.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1378 on: February 10, 2025, 07:07:12 AM »
Nice little drunken piley on going on last night I see. Play nice ladies, or the mods might wake up and they'll take the crayons away again.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?
« Reply #1379 on: February 10, 2025, 08:32:36 AM »
It was a question.
One loaded with implication.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".