Do you thinj CB is guilty

[G-Unit]

It was Helge B who contacted SY in 2008.

2017, I believe.

[Brietta]

To rephrase; I'm not interested in discussing the evidence presented in the rape case. It's over. If people want to discuss it, fine, but misrepresenting it isn't fine.

Discussion on this thread relates to the aggravated rape committed by Brueckner in 2005.

The victim was a 72 year old woman who filed a complaint with the GNR in Portugal at that time.

Brueckner was convicted of perpetrating the outrage by a German court in 2019/



The opening post quite simply asks members if they are in agreement with that conviction.  In other words I think it asks if there was a miscarriage of justice.

Really quite simple without muddying the waters as you tend to do when presenting opinion.  My opinion ;)

[Mr Gray]

2017, I believe.

You won't address the evidence because your confirmation bias is so strong you cannot accept the truth that the evidence in the trial was overwhelming.. Your ducking and diving in this thread shows how uncomfortable the truth makes you feel

[G-Unit]

Discussion on this thread relates to the aggravated rape committed by Brueckner in 2005.

The victim was a 72 year old woman who filed a complaint with the GNR in Portugal at that time.

Brueckner was convicted of perpetrating the outrage by a German court in 2019/



The opening post quite simply asks members if they are in agreement with that conviction.  In other words I think it asks if there was a miscarriage of justice.

Really quite simple without muddying the waters as you tend to do when presenting opinion.  My opinion ;)

I was goaded into taking part and then an attempt was made to make me discuss the evidence. Wrongful information was quoted and I questioned it. Are members allowed to post opinion as fact now?

[Anthro]

2017, I believe.

Again in 2013.

[Brietta]

I was goaded into taking part and then an attempt was made to make me discuss the evidence. Wrongful information was quoted and I questioned it. Are members allowed to post opinion as fact now?

My opinion is that nobody on this forum can be "made to" do anything they do not wish to do.  Coercion would be a rule breaker, I think.

Anyway ~ you are responding to my post which contains no "wrongful information".  Funnily enough sceptics often used to deride my 'long winded' posts and cites in confirmation.
Glad you appear to concur in the necessity for which.

As I said in the post to which you responded ~

Discussion on this thread relates to the aggravated rape committed by Brueckner in 2005.
The victim was a 72 year old woman who filed a complaint with the GNR in Portugal at that time.
Brueckner was convicted of perpetrating the outrage by a German court in 2019/

The opening post quite simply asks members if they are in agreement with that conviction.  In other words I think it asks if there was a miscarriage of justice.
Really quite simple without muddying the waters as you tend to do when presenting opinion.  My opinion ;)

All of that is factual.  Unless you know something to the contrary.
I have identified my opinion that you often muddy the waters. 

So not really an opportunity to beat the rest of the world to starting WWIII just a chance to state if you are in agreement with the German court's guilty verdict on Brueckner based on evidence supplied by the GNR.  Or do you think a miscarriage of justice occurred?

I pressured you for no response.  You chose to, just as quite often you chose not to.  I reiterate ~ no member can coerce another to do anything.  It is all the choice of the individual member.  If you feel the checks and balances are not being adhered to ~ you are perfectly placed to request the problem is looked at.

[G-Unit]

Again in 2013.

Do you have a cite for that please?

[Brietta]

Do you have a cite for that please?

I don't know who the informant was but it is on record that Brueckner''s name was passed to the police in 2013.
Name of new Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner was passed to German police SEVEN years ago by an acquaintance who remembered him from Praia da Luiz
Brueckner's name was passed to police after e-fits were shown on German TV
The Euro News TV programme was watched by millions on October 2013
E-fits showed a ' German speaker' who was of 'vital importance' to the case
It is claimed detectives failed to act on the information passed on by a viewer
By IAN GALLAGHER and JAKE RYAN FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
PUBLISHED: 22:39, 6 June 2020
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8395417/Name-new-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-passed-police-SEVEN-years-ago.html

[Mr Gray]

I was goaded into taking part and then an attempt was made to make me discuss the evidence. Wrongful information was quoted and I questioned it. Are members allowed to post opinion as fact now?

I've corrected that small irrelevant part which has no bearing on  the facts in my post which were presented as evidence in court.
If you felt my posts were goading you should remove them but you can't because they weren't..so you're posting fact as fiction

You can't reply because you can't defend your opinion..lol. You make every excuse not to reply..he's as guilty as hell re the rape..there's no other explanation if you look at the evidence..none..proved by the fact you can't give one..lol

[G-Unit]

Again in 2013.

His name did come up in 2013, but it's not known who named him. The German police looked into it but took no action against him.

[Anthro]

His name did come up in 2013, but it's not known who named him. The German police looked into it but took no action against him.

In my opinion it was Helge Büsching.

[Mr Gray]

I was goaded into taking part and then an attempt was made to make me discuss the evidence. Wrongful information was quoted and I questioned it. Are members allowed to post opinion as fact now?

It's your opinion you were goaded into taking part yet you've stated it as fact,...
Does that answer your question

[Mr Gray]

I was goaded into taking part and then an attempt was made to make me discuss the evidence. Wrongful information was quoted and I questioned it. Are members allowed to post opinion as fact now?

Members could always do what you continually do that is refuse to provide a cite and tell posters to do their own research

[Mr Gray]

i wonder why it has prove dso difficult for gunit to answer this simple question. it can only be taht she is not comfortable admitting the guilt of CB or that she in fact thinks hes innocent. Even going so far as acuusing me of exxagerating the evidence when what i stated re the evidence presented in court was 100% true.
it makes me wonder how far sceptics will go and what evidence they will ignore to try and convince themselves taht CB is somehow being set up as a patsy for the MM case.
If CB is convicted of teh abduction of MM I feel sure despite the evidence and court verdict...psters like gunit will question it.

i do understand why... how could the two best dogs in the world and the best dog handler ever known...be so wrong

[Wonderfulspam]

i wonder why it has prove dso difficult for gunit to answer this simple question. it can only be taht she is not comfortable admitting the guilt of CB or that she in fact thinks hes innocent. Even going so far as acuusing me of exxagerating the evidence when what i stated re the evidence presented in court was 100% true.
it makes me wonder how far sceptics will go and what evidence they will ignore to try and convince themselves taht CB is somehow being set up as a patsy for the MM case.
If CB is convicted of teh abduction of MM I feel sure despite the evidence and court verdict...psters like gunit will question it.

i do understand why... how could the two best dogs in the world and the best dog handler ever known...be so wrong

Well that isn't going to be happening anytime in the foreseeable future, so I wouldn't waste too much thought on the matter really.