What Iffery.

[Wonderfulspam]

How about a sighting of Brueckner abducting Maddie? Oh, wait no, that was Gerry.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What do you 'imagine' this strong evidence might be ?

I’ve no idea, there’s little point speculating about it imo, especially as when I have answered this question before it’s either been ignored or ridiculed,so not about to repeat myself.

[Vertigo Swirl]

How about a sighting of Brueckner abducting Maddie? Oh, wait no, that was Gerry.

Prove it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Prove it.

I don't need to. But Wolters can't disprove it either.

[Wonderfulspam]

I’ve no idea, there’s little point speculating about it imo, especially as when I have answered this question before it’s either been ignored or ridiculed,so not about to repeat myself.

It's nothing. Wolters has nothing. I told you that 5 years ago.

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters previously claimed there was enough evidence to charge. Then he investigated some more & found that there isn’t.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't need to. But Wolters can't disprove it either.

Yes you do need to because you keep claiming it as a fact, as if you were there yourself and saw it happening with your very own eyes rather than relying on a third party report of someone who wasn’t even absolutely certain it was Gerry so quit with the bullshit or come up with the proof.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's nothing. Wolters has nothing. I told you that 5 years ago.

Prove it.
Incidentally Wolters isn’t a one man detective agency. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Prove it.
Incidentally Wolters isn’t a one man detective agency.

I know. The MET can't prove there was an abduction either, nor the BKA, or the PJ. None of them can prove there was an abduction, because there wasn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes you do need to because you keep claiming it as a fact, as if you were there yourself and saw it happening with your very own eyes rather than relying on a third party report of someone who wasn’t even absolutely certain it was Gerry so quit with the bullshit or come up with the proof.

I don't need to prove anything. It is self evident Brueckner is innocent because the McCanns did it.

[The General]

What do you 'imagine' this strong evidence might be ?

Well it's not forensic, that is a cast iron fact according to Two Buckets Wolters.
He / they have alluded to 'circa 2007 magic phone pings', the first draft of his erotic fiction novel and his collection of swimsuit samples from his days as a travelling salesman for Bukta.

Then, of course, there's the hobo testimony that was laughed out of court last October.

That's it. That's the sum total that MACA continue to pin their hopes on. There will be no last minute gambit, no hail Mary. He's being measured for his tag any day - he's getting oot, Gerry, STICK IT UP YEE.

They're actually impinging on his human rights during this last few weeks of his incarceration, as, if it wasn't for the false allegations that were released to the entire planet, he would have been out on licence or day release by now. So there's another couple of hundred grand he can claim.

.....'apple bottom jeanzzzzz, boots with the furrrrr.......'

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't need to prove anything. It is self evident Brueckner is innocent because the McCanns did it.

Prove they did it then.  Go on, the floor is yours.

[The General]

Prove they did it then.  Go on, the floor is yours.

You seem to be missing the point. Two Buckets told everyone he's guilty - so you prove it!

[Vertigo Swirl]

You seem to be missing the point. Two Buckets told everyone he's guilty - so you prove it!

I’m not missing anything.  Wonderfulspam’s logic is that Bruckner can’t be guilty because the McCanns dunnit, so we need him to put his money where his mouth is and show us the proof that they did. 

[Wonderfulspam]

I’m not missing anything.  Wonderfulspam’s logic is that Bruckner can’t be guilty because the McCanns dunnit, so we need him to put his money where his mouth is and show us the proof that they did.

I predicted 5 years ago that Brueckner wouldn't be charged. How did I know he would'nt be charged?Because the McCanns did it. I don't need to prove anything. The three expert investigative forces, in possession of all the evidence, they can't prove Madeleine was abducted. And that's because she just wasn't.