German Prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only for the first case.  He could then settle out of court, have his costs paid, then repeat and rinse his way through the rest of tabloid publishers.

Well the very best of British to him.  He should be a billionaire by this time next year then - no need to break into people’s apartments and steal their kids he’ll be able to afford to hire someone else to do it for him.

[kizzy]

How do you know for certain he wasn’t the abdutor then?  You really should share your evidence with the German investigation if you know something they clearly don’t.

Well its clear they don't know anything...or have any evidence

It seems before long CB could be out on day relese

So if HCW has  - anything - on CB he is running out of tuime.

Or is he just going to sit on it an let what he thinks is a child killer walk the strees.

What part of Re: German Prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner.don't you understand

[faithlilly]

The PJ accused the McCanns of a crime and almost certainly leaked stories to the press about them in 2007.  Unlike Bruckner the McCanns were not criminals with a proven history of rape and child abuse yet they didn’t sue the PJ.  They did sue Amaral and were ultimately unsuccessful.  Perhaps Bruckner will sue every newspaper that reported he was a suspect in the MM case but he’s going to need very generous lawyers or a crowdfunder for that.  Perhaps you should start one now if you haven’t already?

Ah yes Wolters not only accused Brueckner of a crime but went on national television again and again accusing him of the murder of Madeleine…so yes, it is different….and the ‘already a criminal’ spiel, I don’t think that it’ll matter a jot.

The parents didn’t lose, Amaral won.

As to how it is going to be funded he can, again, take a leaf from the parent’s handbook and seek out a no win, no fee arrangement as the parents did with Carter Ruck. Lawyers tend not to be to squeamish about the past crimes of their clients.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well its clear they don't know anything...or have any evidence

It seems before long CB could be out on day relese

So if HCW has  - anything - on CB he is running out of tuime.

Or is he just going to sit on it an let what he thinks is a child killer walk the strees.

What part of Re: German Prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner.don't you understand

What is tuime and what happens when it runs out?  And these strees that child killers walk on - what are they?
Sorry but you did ask for it.  Isn’t it tiresome when people use typos to try and score points, eh?
Getting back to your (badly made) point: I understand fully the sentence “German prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner” what I don’t understand is how that leads you to conclude that he is 100% innocent of involvement in her disappearance.  Perhaps you can explain the logic (doubtful!)

[Vertigo Swirl]

Ah yes Wolters not only accused Brueckner of a crime but went on national television again and again accusing him of the murder of Madeleine…so yes, it is different….and the ‘already a criminal’ spiel, I don’t think that it’ll matter a jot.

The parents didn’t lose, Amaral won.

As to how it is going to be funded he can, again, take a leaf from the parent’s handbook and seek out a no win, no fee arrangement as the parents did with Carter Ruck. Lawyers tend not to be to squeamish about the past crimes of their clients.

How many times has Amaral appeared on TV blatantly accusing the parents?  He made a video too and wrote a book if I recall correctly.  And as the lawsuit was brought by the McCanns they lost - ultimately.  I wonder if Carter Ruck (or similar) will be interested in taking on claims of defamation on behalf of a convicted rapist and child molester.  I mean his reputation and standing were already in tatters before the world had even heard of him.   Time will tell I guess.  In the meantime it would be interesting to read of other cases of defamation that have been won be convicted rapists and child abusers.  There must be some I guess.

[Vertigo Swirl]

To those who supported Amaral’s right to write a book expounding his thesis and all his strenuous efforts to promote it by way of tv and newspaper interviews and a video, do you support HCW’s to do likewise if he so chooses?  Presumably in order to be consistent you would and would therefore not suport any attempts to silence him in the libel courts right? 

[faithlilly]

How many times has Amaral appeared on TV blatantly accusing the parents?  He made a video too and wrote a book if I recall correctly.  And as the lawsuit was brought by the McCanns they lost - ultimately.  I wonder if Carter Ruck (or similar) will be interested in taking on claims of defamation on behalf of a convicted rapist and child molester.  I mean his reputation and standing were already in tatters before the world had even heard of him.   Time will tell I guess.  In the meantime it would be interesting to read of other cases of defamation that have been won be convicted rapists and child abusers.  There must be some I guess.

I’d google Carter Ruck’s clients if I were you. The mendacity of who they’ll represent knows no bounds….from Russian Oligarchs to Kevin Spacey who was facing criminal charges for rape. They’re really not fussy.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’d google Carter Ruck’s clients if I were you. The mendacity of who they’ll represent knows no bounds….from Russian Oligarchs to Kevin Spacey who was facing criminal charges for rape. They’re really not fussy.

That wasn’t quite what I asked for was it?  To be clear: have Carter Ruck (or any other renowned legal firm) successfully represented any convicted rapists or child molesters in a defamation case against the judiciary or the media?  If so it would be interesting to read about these cases. 

ETA: Kevin Spacey has no criminal convictions and therefore is as innocent as the day he was born.

[faithlilly]

That wasn’t quite what I asked for was it?  To be clear: have Carter Ruck (or any other renowned legal firm) successfully represented any convicted rapists or child molesters in a defamation case against the judiciary or the media?  If so it would be interesting to read about these cases. 

ETA: Kevin Spacey has no criminal convictions and therefore is as innocent as the day he was born.

As is Brueckner of any part of Madeleine’s disappearance.

[Wonderfulspam]

To those who supported Amaral’s right to write a book expounding his thesis and all his strenuous efforts to promote it by way of tv and newspaper interviews and a video, do you support HCW’s to do likewise if he so chooses?  Presumably in order to be consistent you would and would therefore not suport any attempts to silence him in the libel courts right?

Amaral never accused the McCanns of murder though.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Amaral never accused the McCanns of murder though.

Doesn’t make any difference.  What he did accuse them of was quite heinous enough.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As is Brueckner of any part of Madeleine’s disappearance.

Technically yes.  But Spacey has never been found guilty of any crime and has a reputation and livlihood to protect , unlike CB who has a hobo grifter with a long string of convictions including rape and child molestation and whose reputation was in tatters before any of us had even heard his name.

[Wonderfulspam]

Doesn’t make any difference.  What he did accuse them of was quite heinous enough.

No I think it was a much lesser crime. Staging an abduction & concealing a corpse. That would probably only be a couple of years sentence. Murder can be punishable by life without parole. It's a much more serious offence.

[Wonderfulspam]

Technically yes.  But Spacey has never been found guilty of any crime and has a reputation and livlihood to protect , unlike CB who has a hobo grifter with a long string of convictions including rape and child molestation and whose reputation was in tatters before any of us had even heard his name.

You keep saying his reputation was in tatters. But most people who knew him probably had no idea he'd been convicted for child sex offences a decade prior & I doubt he was in the habit of admitting to it.

[Lace]

As is Brueckner of any part of Madeleine’s disappearance.

How do you know that?  He resembles the person who was seen staring at 5a.  He fantasises about kidnapping a young girl.  He has sexually assaulted young girls.

He is a prime candidate for taking Madeleine IMO.