German Prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner.

[Wonderfulspam]

How do you know that?  He resembles the person who was seen staring at 5a.  He fantasises about kidnapping a young girl.  He has sexually assaulted young girls.

He is a prime candidate for taking Madeleine IMO.

Show us the E-fit TS had produced & point out the similarities for us.

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway. He hasn't robbed, raped or molested anyone in well over seven years now so just give the guy break.

[kizzy]

What is tuime and what happens when it runs out?  And these strees that child killers walk on - what are they?
Sorry but you did ask for it.  Isn’t it tiresome when people use typos to try and score points, eh?
Getting back to your (badly made) point: I understand fully the sentence “German prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner” what I don’t understand is how that leads you to conclude that he is 100% innocent of involvement in her disappearance.  Perhaps you can explain the logic (doubtful!)

Sorry but you did ask for it.

Ask for what......what ever you meant by that is your problem ...not mine.

"Detectives appear no closer to proving he abducted and killed Madeleine - despite claiming they have proof she is dead

Yet if they hold onto that proof.......knowing CB could be out on day release anytime soon.

HCW is willing it seems to let what he thinks is a child murderer back on the streets

The proof must be very very weak...even weaker than the point you was trying to make in your post.

[kizzy]

How do you know that?  He resembles the person who was seen staring at 5a.  He fantasises about kidnapping a young girl.  He has sexually assaulted young girls.

He is a prime candidate for taking Madeleine IMO.

OFFS.......seems it must be him then...now how about the thousands of others that description  could fit.

[Lace]

OFFS.......seems it must be him then...now how about the thousands of others that description  could fit.

It fitted him!!  With his acne and his leather jacket.  I just hope Wolters can get more evidence before it's too late.  They will be letting a very dangerous Paedophile out to roam the streets.  He'll never change.

[Lace]

You don't want it to be him as it would mean the McCann's are innocent [which they are].   You so don't want to be wrong that you are willing to want CB let out on the streets.  No child will be safe.  Everything points to him being the person who abducted Madeleine. 

A 'dangerous psychopathic sadist' in 'the absolute top league of dangerousness': The shocking assessment of Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner by his horrified psychologist

[Wonderfulspam]

You don't want it to be him as it would mean the McCann's are innocent [which they are].   You so don't want to be wrong that you are willing to want CB let out on the streets.  No child will be safe.  Everything points to him being the person who abducted Madeleine.

OK dear. If you say so. Get back to us when Wolters reveals the abduction evidence which proves the McCanns innocence. It shouldn't be much longer now.

[faithlilly]

How do you know that?  He resembles the person who was seen staring at 5a.  He fantasises about kidnapping a young girl.  He has sexually assaulted young girls.

He is a prime candidate for taking Madeleine IMO.

How do you know that the parents didn’t play a part in Madeleine’s disappearance? Martin Smith not only thought he saw a man with Madeleine in his arms he named him as being Gerry. Then there’s the Gaspar statement of nefarious behaviour between Gerry and David Payne describing child abuse.

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway. It makes no difference at all whether we wish Brueckner be free or otherwise. He has almost served his sentence & so he'll have the right to be released. It's up to the three expert investigative forces to charge & try him for the alleged abduction & murder if they have so much compelling evidence of his crimes, but they're not going to be charging him anytime in the foreseeable future. Which kind of says something about the strength of their evidence really.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No I think it was a much lesser crime. Staging an abduction & concealing a corpse. That would probably only be a couple of years sentence. Murder can be punishable by life without parole. It's a much more serious offence.

We’re talking about defamation here, you do realise that don’t you?  Defamation doesn’t only cover accusations of murder, were you not aware of that?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You keep saying his reputation was in tatters. But most people who knew him probably had no idea he'd been convicted for child sex offences a decade prior & I doubt he was in the habit of admitting to it.

Fact - he is a convicted rapist amd child molester.  He does not have a good name or reputation to protect.  The end.

[Wonderfulspam]

Fact - he is a convicted rapist amd child molester.  He does not have a good name or reputation to protect.  The end.

It depends on who you ask. The tourists who hitched a ride in his campervan had no idea he was a sex offender & they probably thought he was a nice guy. Anyway, I don’t care what you have to say about him. I really like him.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Sorry but you did ask for it.

Ask for what......what ever you meant by that is your problem ...not mine.

"Detectives appear no closer to proving he abducted and killed Madeleine - despite claiming they have proof she is dead

Yet if they hold onto that proof.......knowing CB could be out on day release anytime soon.

HCW is willing it seems to let what he thinks is a child murderer back on the streets

The proof must be very very weak...even weaker than the point you was trying to make in your post.

You have a short memory Kizzy.  May I draw your attention to reply 221 on this thread where you attempted to score a silly point by highlighting my typo.  I was merely illustrating how irritating it is when people do that, hopefully you understand that now though I’m not holding my breath as your comprehension skills leave a lot to be desired imo.
HCW is the opposite of willing to let a child murderer back on the streets, that’s what the last 4 years have been about.  But if the burden of proof is insufficient to bring a successful case against the suspect then there’s not much he can do about it is there, short of manufacturing evidence against him, which I’m sure you wouldn’t want him to do, eh?

[Lace]

How do you know that the parents didn’t play a part in Madeleine’s disappearance? Martin Smith not only thought he saw a man with Madeleine in his arms he named him as being Gerry. Then there’s the Gaspar statement of nefarious behaviour between Gerry and David Payne describing child abuse.

It couldn't have been Gerry as he was at the Tapas Bar when Smith is supposed to have seen him.  I dismiss the Gasper statement.  Who in their right mind would discuss Paedophilia with Mrs Gaspar sitting between them. 

[Wonderfulspam]

We’re talking about defamation here, you do realise that don’t you?  Defamation doesn’t only cover accusations of murder, were you not aware of that?

The level of defamation is different in the two cases. Murder is a worse stain on one's reputation than panicking after an accident & shoving your 3 year old body in a freezer imo