German Prosecutor has no plans to charge Christian Bruckner.

[Eleanor]

.....or lack of evidence.

There was No Evidence.

[The General]

There was No Evidence.

There was, there was a witness statement from a concerned citizen. Not enough in isolation, though.

[Brietta]

https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=5775.msg203489#msg203489

There was a reason for setting up a page. Probably in deference to LIBEL LAWS. If you must please continue posting as above.

[kizzy]

Please post on appropriate thread as requested. Thank You

[Eleanor]

There was, there was a witness statement from a concerned citizen. Not enough in isolation, though.

A statement that her husband disagreed with. And he was there.

[Lace]

Please post on appropriate thread as requested. Thank You

Could be he just let the Police deal with it.   

[Vertigo Swirl]

But there's insufficient evidence Lord Alf. Make your mind up.

If you look back about 4 years, not that anyone would want to, there's a wager I set re: CB being charged.
It still stands, except the prize is now £88.32 for each of the blessed few remaining MACA loyalists.
It was apparent even then that this was a fit up.

What exactly is it you want me to make my mind up about Generally Nonsense?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well it wasn't his daughter creepy Dave was *allegedly* referring to, so the polite course of action they took was probably warranted.
Again, Gerry should have punched his c*** right in, and booted him senseless. Yet not even a raised eyebrow; quite the opposite, in fact.
Hang on, you're not in the Dav camp are you, 'it never happened'?

Your post reveals far more about you than it does anything to do with this case.  Have you actually done time for a violent crime?  I seem to recall something along those lines, happy to be corrected however.

[Vertigo Swirl]

They investigated as much as they could, perhaps.
They may have got round to asking Gerry specifically once he was charged.

Oh yes I can just imagine the interrogation.
“Two years before Madeleine’s disappearance it has been alleged by one of your friends that DP sucked on a finger whilst twiirling the other finger around his nipple area whilst fully clothed.  Apparently this was in reference to your daughter Madeleine and apparently you didn’t even punch his c*** in.  What do you have to say about this?”

[Vertigo Swirl]

Explain to me how circling your nipple while putting your finger in and out your mouth could possibly describe breat feeding?

You don’t have a child do you?  So what’s the point of trying to explain?  What do you think DP was actually describing then?  Go on spell it out.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Occulation of a corpse, failing to report a death, wasting police time, perverting the course of justice, fraud, obtaining monies by deception, false representation, coercive behaviour. I don't know if he would have been charged with any of these, but if sufficient evidence was obtained, and that must've been a close run thing, then who knows.
A bit like CB being charged with kidnap, rape, murder if sufficient evidence was available.

Which leads me to my next revelation: there's more circumstantial evidence in relation to GM and KM being involved than in relation to CB.
Couple that with the same for forensic evidence and we have quite a compelling state of affairs.

LOL.  Groundhog Day Klaxon.  HONK HONK!!!

[Vertigo Swirl]

But she didn't insist on leaving.

And she didn’t punch him in the c*** like any normal person would have apparently.  Can you imagine?  It’s obviously a Scouse thing.

[Vertigo Swirl]

This is what she said that their conversation was about.

“ I was seated between Dave and Gerry who I believe were both speaking about Madeleine. I don't remember the conversation in its entirety, but it seemed they were discussing a possible scenario. I remember Dave telling Gerry something like "she", referring to Madeleine, "would do this".
When he mentioned "this", Dave was sucking on one of his fingers, pushing it inside and outside his mouth, while with the other hand he made a circle around his nipple, in a circulatory movement over his clothes. This was done in a provocative manner and carried an explicit insinuation in relation to what he was saying and doing.”

Yes because two paedos usually discuss their sexual exploits with a pearl-clutching female doctor sat between them at the dinner table. My eyes are rolling so far back into my head I can see my brain from here.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just repeating what the police are saying.

What police are saying this? *checks calendar to make sure I’ve not fallen down a wormhole back to 2007*

[Eleanor]

What police are saying this? *checks calendar to make sure I’ve not fallen down a wormhole back to 2007*

The General is making it up as he goes along, again.