Psychics, Criminal Profilers, Trolls ... What is the difference?

[Anthro]

I think it was just a joke,not malicious.


If you look for offence you will find it whether it is there or not.

I apologise. I did not get that.

[Mr Gray]

I think we have to accept there are things we don't know and can't explain rationally. Having said that We may have lost our sixth sense which dogs  and other animals have.

I find it interesting and did a study on phobias. Why would someone be afraid of snakes and spiders if they never actually had seen one or interacted with one. I concluded, with a bit or skepticism, that it was an irrational fear, unless the sixth sense has instilled a fear from back in our ancestry our forefathers did know to be afraid of poisonous spiders and killer snakes.

But is has been said -we don't know what we don't know!

There's no evidence of anything supernatural....

[The General]

I will start a petition!!

Let Sadie In!  even though I am not a friend!!!

No! b....r off!

[G-Unit]

I apologise. I did not get that.

British humour is an acquired taste. Even some Brirish people don't always get it.

[Robittybob1]

This is disrespectful?

Finding the tele remote would be a very useful advantage.

[sadie]

I will start a petition!!

Let Sadie In!  even though I am not a friend!!!

Thanks Mistaken,

But with all the registered but generally non posting members on your side of the argument against the many fewer registered members on our side, it would be a walk over, if they were whipped up!


So I will decline the offer.  Thank you.



Because of this diametrically opposed inbalance of posters, I never vote in any of the polls on here ... cos I always know that if wished it will always be a walk over to the one side with more members (which is your side)


Anyway, John tells me that the problem is not with the forum, but with my browser, or something like that



But I must admit to wondering where Slarti is ... and what he is doing these days?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Thanks Mistaken,

But with all the registered but generally non posting members on your side of the argument against the many fewer registered members on our side, it would be a walk over, if they were whipped up!


So I will decline the offer.  Thank you.



Because of this diametrically opposed inbalance of posters, I never vote in any of the polls on here ... cos I always know that if wished it will always be a walk over to the one side with more members (which is your side)


Anyway, John tells me that the problem is not with the forum, but with my browser, or something like that



But I must admit to wondering where Slarti is ... and what he is doing these days?

Hi Sadie,  I don't have a side!    I was going to advise regarding your browser, but got waylaid as usual.

I think it would be appreciated by those who do not support the McCann Narrative on this forum to be treated with a bit of respect.  We are all entitled to not like people and we are all entitled to voice an opinion no matter if someone is offended, because at the end of the day debate done correctly can be an education. the sniping and goading on this McCann thread is unprecedented and unhealthy.

 If Some one posted that Bojo is a ....ker  Would tory voters be offended ? and should anyone care if they were?

[Mr Gray]

Hi Sadie,  I don't have a side!    I was going to advise regarding your browser, but got waylaid as usual.

I think it would be appreciated by those who do not support the McCann Narrative on this forum to be treated with a bit of respect.  We are all entitled to not like people and we are all entitled to voice an opinion no matter if someone is offended, because at the end of the day debate done correctly can be an education. the sniping and goading on this McCann thread is unprecedented and unhealthy.

 If Some one posted that Bojo is a ....ker  Would tory voters be offended ? and should anyone care if they were?

What i would say is posting such a childish thing is a poor example to set our children...plus it points to someone having a low intellect

[Miss Taken Identity]

What i would say is posting such a childish thing is a poor example to set our children...plus it points to someone having a low intellect

Aha  back to the low intellect/mentally ill charge of old. Good for you Davel. You are an expert on child welfare now.? I can't help but be impressed how you have grown with google.

[Mr Gray]

Aha  back to the low intellect/mentally ill charge of old. Good for you Davel. You are an expert on child welfare now.? I can't help but be impressed how you have grown with google.

I think its extremely low intellect and childish to say boris is a...........      i would not like ny children to think that was accepatble and they can use google too. Anyone who thinks the internet is not a wonderful source of information and knowlwdge is a dinosaur....I'm happy not to be one

[Miss Taken Identity]

I think its extremely low intellect and childish to say boris is a...........      i would not like ny children to think that was accepatble and they can use google too. Anyone who thinks the internet is not a wonderful source of information and knowlwdge is a dinosaur....I'm happy not to be one

It would seem your own intellect is questionable since you are unable to read and digest a perfectly written post.

if it is allowed to challenge your intellect as per forum rules of course.

So       I               will                      say                    this             very                        slow.

If someone called BOJO  a ....ker  would Tory voters be upset on his behalf, would BOJO be upset? what should happen to that person?

 I would argue that it is disrespectful but not a crime ,certainly not worthy of others to jump into a name calling frenzy. it would be for BOJO to deal with in his way.


Sooooooo That was my point. show respect for opinions of others who you do not share and let those who are challenged be challenged without third party 'suffering'.

[Mr Gray]

It would seem your own intellect is questionable since you are unable to read and digest a perfectly written post.

if it is allowed to challenge your intellect as per forum rules of course.

So       I               will                      say                    this             very                        slow.

If someone called BOJO  a ....ker  would Tory voters be upset on his behalf, would BOJO be upset? what should happen to that person?

 I would argue that it is disrespectful but not a crime ,certainly not worthy of others to jump into a name calling frenzy. it would be for BOJO to deal with in his way.


Sooooooo That was my point. show respect for opinions of others who you do not share and let those who are challenged be challenged without third party 'suffering'.

You need to show respect for my opinions . I have agreat deal of respect for boris, i think hes handled brexit and Cov extremely well. I wouldnt be at all offended if someone called him a ******.....i think it would show that they themselves were more than a little thick. Theres nothing more to be said as you have told me how you should show resepct for others opinion...which of course includes mine

[Miss Taken Identity]

You need to show respect for my opinions . I have agreat deal of respect for boris, i think hes handled brexit and Cov extremely well. I wouldnt be at all offended if someone called him a ******.....i think it would show that they themselves were more than a little thick. Theres nothing more to be said as you have told me how you should show resepct for others opinion...which of course includes mine

As per usual, your reply post is a rant about something else. Notthing to do with my post at all.

I said. "If someone called BOJO  a ....ker  would Tory voters be upset on his behalf, would BOJO be upset?

what should happen to that person?

 I would argue that it is disrespectful but not a crime ,certainly not worthy of others to jump into a name calling frenzy. it would be for BOJO to deal with in his way."

[The General]

You need to show respect for my opinions . I have agreat deal of respect for boris, i think hes handled brexit and Cov extremely well. I wouldnt be at all offended if someone called him a ******.....i think it would show that they themselves were more than a little thick. Theres nothing more to be said as you have told me how you should show resepct for others opinion...which of course includes mine

Because I posted in reply this conversation will now be deemed off topic and a zealot will intervene; but Davel, you routinely show disdain for the opinion of others. A little balance?
BTW, I think he's handled it poorly, particularly the hand shaking incident where it's most likely he spread the virus around his cabinet and outer circle.

[Mr Gray]

Because I posted in reply this conversation will now be deemed off topic and a zealot will intervene; but Davel, you routinely show disdain for the opinion of others. A little balance?
BTW, I think he's handled it poorly, particularly the hand shaking incident where it's most likely he spread the virus around his cabinet and outer circle.

I posted on this topic before... What's important is the evidence an opinion is based on.. That's how I judge an opinion