Author Topic: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?  (Read 126352 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #525 on: November 11, 2013, 11:36:50 AM »
This is just a regurgitation from years ago.  Someone who was  weeks before the disappearance, but not at the time, as I recall.  Amazing what they'll do to sell papers

I wonder what SY make of this ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #526 on: November 11, 2013, 12:03:32 PM »
This is just a regurgitation from years ago.  Someone who was  weeks before the disappearance, but not at the time, as I recall.  Amazing what they'll do to sell papers

I wonder what SY make of this ?

Well it's just more rollocks from the Sun.

Offline faithlilly

Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #527 on: November 11, 2013, 02:36:47 PM »
Putting myself in smithmans position I don't think I could deposit in the trash & hope no one finds her, I would have the niggling doubt that the bin might get knocked over or the binmen might by chance notice the body as it enters the bin lorry.
I can imagine a couple of more secure methods of disposal, however they would require pre-planning.

Perhaps the body was meant to be found. If it was Gerry seen by the Smiths he may have wanted the body to be found but for it to be far enough from their apartment so it didn't implicate them. Any signs of trauma/sedation could then be blamed on the abductor.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2013, 02:40:45 PM by Faithlilly »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #528 on: November 11, 2013, 03:01:25 PM »

THis is disgraceful It was Gerry Mccann


Provide the statement that Gerry was searching the tapas bar area in those first 5 minutes? David Payne did and told Dianne Webster to go and she went straight to the apartment and found Kate alone with the twins.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2013, 03:06:17 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #529 on: November 11, 2013, 03:05:07 PM »
Perhaps the body was meant to be found. If it was Gerry seen by the Smiths he may have wanted the body to be found but for it to be far enough from their apartment so it didn't implicate them. Any signs of trauma/sedation could then be blamed on the abductor.

The Body?

What body?

If this has already been posted, I'm naturally delighted, because this article should be repeated as often as possible:

From today's Times:

For [ censored word ]s of the poor McCanns it’s open season
Janice Turner

Print
Share via
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Published at 12:01AM, October 17 2013
Notebook
What a hard week for Kate and Gerry McCann. Every fragment of hope from a new Scotland Yard lead comes with regret: if only six years ago Portuguese police had done their job. These new e-fit figures seen loitering in stairwells or carrying a sleeping child towards the sea are so shadowy and long-scattered that it is like searching for people who appeared in a dream.
And the McCanns know that the price of another public appeal is refuelling the anger of those who hate them. No tabloid newspaper, however bile-spewing or intrusive, has ever published such vile, defamatory and cruel words as those written about the McCanns by ordinary British citizens.
Even the Daily Express, house journal of the Madeleine trolls, did not photoshop her parents’ heads on to the Moors murderers Myra Hindley and Ian Brady as someone did on Twitter this week. I regularly receive updates from strange organisations — if that is the right term for anonymous e-mail accounts writing mainly in block capitals — purporting to expose the “truth” about the McCanns’ lies.
Online is a bizarre netherworld of people who, against all evidence, refuse to believe Madeleine was not killed by her parents. Well, they seem “cold”, a bit creepy, look at them loving being on TV.
Madder than Diana conspiracists, more visceral than 9/11 deniers, the McCann trolls exude the ancient gut fury of lynchings and witch trials. For some, Madeleine allows them to vent class rage: “a poor mum who left her babies to go down the boozer wouldn’t get any sympathy”. For others, particularly mothers, the case permits a heady, puffed-up righteousness: “I’d never neglect my kids like that.”
Even if Madeleine was found alive, some would insist she was an imposter, that DNA tests were further lies. McCann trolls wouldn’t let mere truth spoil the thrill of a good hate.


Incidentally Faith, is there any chance you could email your mate Nigel Moore and let him know he continues to peddle outright falsehoods and lies on his site?



Offline jassi

Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #530 on: November 11, 2013, 03:11:51 PM »
I don't know who Janice Turner is, but I presume she is another of these people who 'know'  exactly what happened.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline faithlilly

Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #531 on: November 11, 2013, 03:16:36 PM »
The Body?

What body?

If this has already been posted, I'm naturally delighted, because this article should be repeated as often as possible:

From today's Times:

For [ censored word ]s of the poor McCanns it’s open season
Janice Turner

Print
Share via
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Published at 12:01AM, October 17 2013
Notebook
What a hard week for Kate and Gerry McCann. Every fragment of hope from a new Scotland Yard lead comes with regret: if only six years ago Portuguese police had done their job. These new e-fit figures seen loitering in stairwells or carrying a sleeping child towards the sea are so shadowy and long-scattered that it is like searching for people who appeared in a dream.
And the McCanns know that the price of another public appeal is refuelling the anger of those who hate them. No tabloid newspaper, however bile-spewing or intrusive, has ever published such vile, defamatory and cruel words as those written about the McCanns by ordinary British citizens.
Even the Daily Express, house journal of the Madeleine trolls, did not photoshop her parents’ heads on to the Moors murderers Myra Hindley and Ian Brady as someone did on Twitter this week. I regularly receive updates from strange organisations — if that is the right term for anonymous e-mail accounts writing mainly in block capitals — purporting to expose the “truth” about the McCanns’ lies.
Online is a bizarre netherworld of people who, against all evidence, refuse to believe Madeleine was not killed by her parents. Well, they seem “cold”, a bit creepy, look at them loving being on TV.
Madder than Diana conspiracists, more visceral than 9/11 deniers, the McCann trolls exude the ancient gut fury of lynchings and witch trials. For some, Madeleine allows them to vent class rage: “a poor mum who left her babies to go down the boozer wouldn’t get any sympathy”. For others, particularly mothers, the case permits a heady, puffed-up righteousness: “I’d never neglect my kids like that.”
Even if Madeleine was found alive, some would insist she was an imposter, that DNA tests were further lies. McCann trolls wouldn’t let mere truth spoil the thrill of a good hate.


Incidentally Faith, is there any chance you could email your mate Nigel Moore and let him know he continues to peddle outright falsehoods and lies on his site?

Lord please save us from another opinion piece !!
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #532 on: November 11, 2013, 03:25:50 PM »
Lord please save us from another opinion piece !!

Don't worry, there's no hint of Blacksmith in sight (for the time being) ...

Aiofe

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #533 on: November 11, 2013, 04:57:53 PM »
There was no organisation, they run in all directions, thinking that she couldn't be far away.
The Oldfields apparently went straight to their flat and the McCanns to theirs.
You might be right about the flowerbed, but no bag. None of them says they went on this dark alley path. After turning right between the two buildings and on reaching the G5 carpark, there are little steps on the left that lead to the upper G4 carpark. This carpark entry/exit leaves you almost at the corner of Primeiro de Maio/Agostinho da Silva.

What a crime- a terrible thing happens and people are not organised to your ex post facto expectations. Have you not heard of panic reactions.

Aiofe

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #534 on: November 11, 2013, 05:00:53 PM »
The Body?

What body?

If this has already been posted, I'm naturally delighted, because this article should be repeated as often as possible:

From today's Times:

For [ censored word ]s of the poor McCanns it’s open season
Janice Turner

Print
Share via
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Published at 12:01AM, October 17 2013
Notebook
What a hard week for Kate and Gerry McCann. Every fragment of hope from a new Scotland Yard lead comes with regret: if only six years ago Portuguese police had done their job. These new e-fit figures seen loitering in stairwells or carrying a sleeping child towards the sea are so shadowy and long-scattered that it is like searching for people who appeared in a dream.
And the McCanns know that the price of another public appeal is refuelling the anger of those who hate them. No tabloid newspaper, however bile-spewing or intrusive, has ever published such vile, defamatory and cruel words as those written about the McCanns by ordinary British citizens.
Even the Daily Express, house journal of the Madeleine trolls, did not photoshop her parents’ heads on to the Moors murderers Myra Hindley and Ian Brady as someone did on Twitter this week. I regularly receive updates from strange organisations — if that is the right term for anonymous e-mail accounts writing mainly in block capitals — purporting to expose the “truth” about the McCanns’ lies.
Online is a bizarre netherworld of people who, against all evidence, refuse to believe Madeleine was not killed by her parents. Well, they seem “cold”, a bit creepy, look at them loving being on TV.
Madder than Diana conspiracists, more visceral than 9/11 deniers, the McCann trolls exude the ancient gut fury of lynchings and witch trials. For some, Madeleine allows them to vent class rage: “a poor mum who left her babies to go down the boozer wouldn’t get any sympathy”. For others, particularly mothers, the case permits a heady, puffed-up righteousness: “I’d never neglect my kids like that.”
Even if Madeleine was found alive, some would insist she was an imposter, that DNA tests were further lies. McCann trolls wouldn’t let mere truth spoil the thrill of a good hate.


Incidentally Faith, is there any chance you could email your mate Nigel Moore and let him know he continues to peddle outright falsehoods and lies on his site?




I can't say how much I agree with this characterisation of the Ant- McCann Cult.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #535 on: November 11, 2013, 05:21:02 PM »
I don't know who Janice Turner is, but I presume she is another of these people who 'know'  exactly what happened.
?{)(**

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #536 on: November 11, 2013, 05:26:35 PM »
Provide the statement that Gerry was searching the tapas bar area in those first 5 minutes? David Payne did and told Dianne Webster to go and she went straight to the apartment and found Kate alone with the twins.
As she stayed there for about 10 minutes before going to pick up left things at the restaurant, without seeing Mr McCann, we can imagine he had gone to the creche above the main reception to see if by chance Madeleine wasn't there, as told in "Madeleine".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #537 on: November 11, 2013, 05:35:13 PM »
Is that what he said. Any alibi?

« Last Edit: November 11, 2013, 05:38:04 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #538 on: November 11, 2013, 05:35:28 PM »
Perhaps the body was meant to be found. If it was Gerry seen by the Smiths he may have wanted the body to be found but for it to be far enough from their apartment so it didn't implicate them. Any signs of trauma/sedation could then be blamed on the abductor.
The unrecoverable body was the only chance of success the abduction from bed had to be the one and only narrative.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?
« Reply #539 on: November 11, 2013, 05:37:26 PM »
Is that what he said. Any alibi?
It's said in Madeleine, no time indicated. He was alone, nobody saw him at the creche nor at the main reception.