Author Topic: Why did Mark Warner offer a baby listening service  (Read 12572 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why did Mark Warner offer a baby listening service
« Reply #30 on: July 17, 2013, 07:44:52 AM »
This is a silly thread

We all know that,  in truth,  our babes are our own responsibility

'Listening services'   my ar..

We took care our  kids ourselves when they were little  ...  like most everyone else does

Please  ...   let's not pretend that the McCann's    'childcare'  regime was ,  somehow  'normal'


I completely agree.

What the mccanns did, was arrogant, stupid and lead to the disappearance of Madeleine.

Offline Benice

Re: Why did Mark Warner offer a baby listening service
« Reply #31 on: July 17, 2013, 09:46:18 AM »

I completely agree.

What the mccanns did, was arrogant, stupid and lead to the disappearance of Madeleine.

So you keep saying, but never the same criticism of all the thousands of other parents who did and still do the same.   In fact never even an acknowledgement that they or the Baby Listening service exist anywhere.    How odd.
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Why did Mark Warner offer a baby listening service
« Reply #32 on: July 17, 2013, 09:52:18 AM »
So you keep saying, but never the same criticism of all the thousands of other parents who did and still do the same.   In fact never even an acknowledgement that they or the Baby Listening service exist anywhere.    How odd.

So do you have statistics for people who go out and leave 3 very young children by themselves in unlocked accommodation whilst out wining and dining ?

I also wonder how many people would never dream of doing what the Mccanns did or have done that.

I also wonder how many case in the UK there are of people being prosecuted for doing what the Mccanns have done, though of course many hearings of this nature are held behind closed doors and never see the light of day.

As to the baby listening service, what relevance does this have ?

Offline Benice

Re: Why did Mark Warner offer a baby listening service
« Reply #33 on: July 17, 2013, 01:04:40 PM »
So do you have statistics for people who go out and leave 3 very young children by themselves in unlocked accommodation whilst out wining and dining ?

I also wonder how many people would never dream of doing what the Mccanns did or have done that.

I also wonder how many case in the UK there are of people being prosecuted for doing what the Mccanns have done, though of course many hearings of this nature are held behind closed doors and never see the light of day.

As to the baby listening service, what relevance does this have ?

Why do you need statistics, the very fact that the Baby Listening service is offered in holiday resorts  is proof that it is used and even more importantly - proof that there is a demand for it.

I'm sure there are lots of people who wouldn't dream of doing what the McCanns did - but that's their choice.  Different people make different choices.

The Baby Listening service is legal, otherwise it would not be allowed to exist.   The McCanns duplicated that service with a superior one - where instead of just listening at doors they could actually go into the apartments.

IMO Suggesting that they should be prosecuted is like saying the loving mother of a child who drowned in the bath because it was left unattended for a while should be prosecuted - or that parents of children who wander off for any amount of reasons and drown in garden pools should be prosecuted.   They are not because it is recognised as  'human error 'Stephen  -  and we are all capable of it - including the McCanns.







 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal