Author Topic: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?  (Read 40827 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #135 on: February 18, 2015, 10:15:03 AM »
Even a cursory glance through your previous posts is testament to your current position being somewhat of a climb down from "Amaral is beaten, Amaral is Toast, Amaral knows he is beaten that is why he (?) is causing delays....... "

 @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*   what's toast is a claim for 1.2 million euros  %£&)**#
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #136 on: February 18, 2015, 10:53:38 AM »
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*   what's toast is a claim for 1.2 million euros  %£&)**#

I wonder if the judge will use the Portuguese equivalent of words like boundless and exorbitant ?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #137 on: February 18, 2015, 11:24:37 AM »
I wonder if the judge will use the Portuguese equivalent of words like boundless and exorbitant ?

I would have thought reckless and neglectful better.
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #138 on: February 18, 2015, 11:33:14 AM »
I wonder if the judge will use the Portuguese equivalent of words like boundless and exorbitant ?

What is the Portuguese equivalent of 'yer aving a laff ' ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #139 on: February 18, 2015, 11:40:54 AM »
Even a cursory glance through your previous posts is testament to your current position being somewhat of a climb down from "Amaral is beaten, Amaral is Toast, Amaral knows he is beaten that is why he (?) is causing delays....... "

then I will repeat for you...amaral is beaten...amaral is toast....that's why he tried to delay the trial and continually sacked lawyers...

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #140 on: February 18, 2015, 11:58:12 AM »
then I will repeat for you...amaral is beaten...amaral is toast....that's why he tried to delay the trial and continually sacked lawyers...

As they say....   in yer dreams.  Is that why the McC's tried to settle out of court?   @)(++(*
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #141 on: February 18, 2015, 01:19:45 PM »
As they say....   in yer dreams.  Is that why the McC's tried to settle out of court?   @)(++(*

In every libel/damages trial their is an effort to settle out of court...the offer of a settlement will reflect well on the McCanns when costs are awarded...that's why they did it

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #142 on: February 18, 2015, 01:54:06 PM »
In every libel/damages trial their is an effort to settle out of court...the offer of a settlement will reflect well on the McCanns when costs are awarded...that's why they did it

It is, you have to admit, very unusual for the litigant to attempt an out of court settlement.
I wonder how the claim that Amaral made over a million will go down in the light of what was proven.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #143 on: February 18, 2015, 03:19:38 PM »
It is, you have to admit, very unusual for the litigant to attempt an out of court settlement.
I wonder how the claim that Amaral made over a million will go down in the light of what was proven.

it is not unusual and I understand is normal practice....the mccanns sought an out of court settlement with Bennet

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #144 on: February 18, 2015, 03:59:56 PM »
it is not unusual and I understand is normal practice....the mccanns sought an out of court settlement with Bennet

So what were all the posts on this forum a few months (?) ago about how Dr Amaral was wriggling trying to settle out of court and 'twas he not the McCanns who caused all the delays by trying to settle out of court?
If the McCanns were trying to settle out of court why the necessity to attempt deny it back then if it is indeed "normal practice" ?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #145 on: February 18, 2015, 11:11:50 PM »
it is not unusual and I understand is normal practice....the mccanns sought an out of court settlement with Bennet

For a defendant in this country but a plaintiff in Portugal....almost unheard of and will make absolutely no difference to the monies awarded, if in fact there are any.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Benice

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #146 on: February 19, 2015, 07:42:12 AM »
For a defendant in this country but a plaintiff in Portugal....almost unheard of and will make absolutely no difference to the monies awarded, if in fact there are any.

As far as I know it has never been divulged who first instigated exploring whether or not an out of court settlement could be achieved.

IIRC Whichever side it was - only the Plaintiff can apply to the court for time to do this -  the Defendant does not have that right and can only do it via the Plaintiff.

Therefore although it may have been the McCanns who originally made this suggestion - it could just as easily have been Amaral.

AFAIK - no-one knows.

(from memory)



The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Should we have faith in SY given the wrongful conviction of Barry George?
« Reply #147 on: February 19, 2015, 07:42:36 AM »
So what were all the posts on this forum a few months (?) ago about how Dr Amaral was wriggling trying to settle out of court and 'twas he not the McCanns who caused all the delays by trying to settle out of court?
If the McCanns were trying to settle out of court why the necessity to attempt deny it back then if it is indeed "normal practice" ?

Who was denying it...

Offline Nicholas

I have severe reservations about the ability of Scotland Yard to conduct a proper investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann given that several members of the team were involved in the wrongful conviction of Barry George who as a consequence of their actions served a term of some 8 years in prison.

It is bad enough that someone of sound mind should serve time in prison for a crime they did not commit but to implicate a guy with learning difficulties in what was most probably a professional assination is despicable in my book.


120

You appear to have allowed your bias to over ride logic and reason.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation