Author Topic: For Albertini ...  (Read 118688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #390 on: August 20, 2013, 12:38:27 AM »
As I have posted several times, could you post the original in Portuguese that you are referring to

Follow the link that i pasted with the English translation. Every original Portuguese page is there.

Find the page, provide the original Portuguese and your translation showing how and why you think what he said was different.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #391 on: August 20, 2013, 12:39:42 AM »
Follow the link that i pasted with the English translation. Every original Portuguese page is there.

Find the page, provide the original Portuguese and your translation showing how and why you think what he said was different.

its not there
Could you prove it is there by posting it

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #392 on: August 20, 2013, 12:44:31 AM »
its not there
Could you prove it is there by posting it

Oh yes it is:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P17/17_VOLUME_XVIIa_Page_4638.jpg



Note the word "inocĂȘncia". Twice.

Wrong again.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #393 on: August 20, 2013, 12:53:16 AM »
Just to confirm everything I have said
I cannot believe that the Ag said that the McCanns have not proved their innocence
The man is an idiot

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #394 on: August 20, 2013, 12:56:29 AM »
Just to confirm everything I have said
I cannot believe that the Ag said that the McCanns have not proved their innocence
The man is an idiot

No to confirm what you actually said:

Quote
I don't think he said what you think he said

The AG report clearly DID say they haven't proven their innocence and no he's not an idiot.

So will you wtihdraw what you said as being wrong?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #395 on: August 20, 2013, 12:57:55 AM »
Absolutely not,
The man is an idiot....  a complete and utter idiot

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #396 on: August 20, 2013, 01:01:07 AM »
Absolutely not,
The man is an idiot....  a complete and utter idiot

No, withdraw your assertion that you don't think he said what I think he said.

You have produced no evidence to support that at all, and in fact i have provided you with the proof he did say that.

The fact that you say he is an idiot, i feel, speaks more about you than him, i'm afraid.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #397 on: August 20, 2013, 01:13:25 AM »
No, withdraw your assertion that you don't think he said what I think he said.

You have produced no evidence to support that at all, and in fact i have provided you with the proof he did say that.

The fact that you say he is an idiot, i feel, speaks more about you than him, i'm afraid.

........moderated as inappropriate comment ....

 What you have managed to prove is that Portugal has a most basic justice system where suspects have to prove themselves innocent. What a disgrace
SY regard the McCannS as innocent

« Last Edit: August 20, 2013, 01:22:05 AM by Mr Moderator »

Offline Albertini

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #398 on: August 20, 2013, 01:20:58 AM »
It doesn't really bother me what you think as I regard you , from your posts as an absolute idiot.

Oh dear, you've used the word idiot again. Your insults are wearing as thin as your vocabulary, and an indication of your inability to debate in a civil manner and to back up your assertions with evidence or supporting information. When all you can do to defend your thoughts is accuse others of being "idiots" you've lost the argument.

Hugely embarrasing for you i know.

Most of your posts are made during working hours which suggests you are unemployed, or unemployable.

Er no. I run my own business, so i have staff working for me who do what's needed during working hours. I'm free to come and go as i please on here and elsewhere.

What you have managed to prove is that Portugal has a most basic justice system where suspects have to prove themselves innocent. What a disgrace

Hardly when Leicestershire Police said exactly the same thing.


SY regard the McccANNS as innocent

Well we will see aboiut that once they have an abductor caught and in the dock. Then we will see what evidence they have to show the McCann's were "innocent".

Offline Chinagirl

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #399 on: August 20, 2013, 06:33:02 AM »
Quote
Well we will see aboiut that once they have an abductor caught and in the dock. Then we will see what evidence they have to show the McCann's were "innocent".

A trial of an abductor would not "show the McCanns were innocent."  Such a trial would simply determine whether that abductor was guilty or not gulity of the abduction of Madeleine.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2013, 06:38:53 AM by Mr Moderator »
A

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #400 on: August 20, 2013, 07:11:20 AM »
A trial of an abductor would not "show the McCanns were innocent."  Such a trial would simply determine whether that abductor was guilty or not gulity of the abduction of Madeleine.

I am quite intrigued. How can you have a trial of someone who hasn't been proven to exist ?

Offline sadie

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #401 on: August 20, 2013, 08:40:35 AM »
BUMPED FOR CHINAGIRL

A trial of an abductor would not "show the McCanns were innocent."  Such a trial would simply determine whether that abductor was guilty or not gulity of the abduction of Madeleine.

Offline Chinagirl

Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #402 on: August 20, 2013, 08:50:45 AM »
I am quite intrigued. How can you have a trial of someone who hasn't been proven to exist ?

You obviously have not noticed the use of conditionals in my comment .....
A

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #403 on: August 20, 2013, 08:52:19 AM »
You obviously have not noticed the use of conditionals in my comment .....

I am quite aware of your intention.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: For Albertini ...
« Reply #404 on: August 20, 2013, 09:08:44 AM »
Are you saying Stephen, that THIS FORUM is the only place in the world, where the word abductor is NOT allowed ?

Never said that.

Now provide proof of your 'theories'.

Have you been in contact with SY in regard to them ?