Twitter pays dividends

[Admin]

People are beginning to come forward who have known Jeremy Bamber at different stages over the last 50 years.  The latest being a guy who spent some two years with him on the same landing at HMP Full Sutton. He considers him to be truly guilty.

We will copy any information we get as and when it arrives.

He writes...

I was on the same wing as Bamber for over two years. He's guilty, nobody liked him, he's self-centred.

Bamber can be all things to all people, a wolf in sheep's clothing.

i studied journalism in prison surrounded by several infamous murderers. I made case studies on the them as practice.


https://twitter.com/#!/crimewriter1

[John]

They are beginning to come out of the woodwork now.

[Admin]

Steve posts...

I have heard him state: 'the witnesses are dead.' he's always known there is half a chance, as nobody can point the finger.

[Admin]

As certain Bamber supporters have openly claimed that Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent, we have made a direct approach to Mr McKay on Twitter this morning and asked him to confirm or deny his belief that Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

We are still waiting.

[John]

As certain Bamber supporters have openly claimed that Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent, we have made a direct approach to Mr McKay on Twitter this morning and asked him to confirm or deny his belief that Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

We are still waiting.

I wouldn't hold your breath admin.  Jackie Preece knows nothing about Simon McKay except what little he chooses to share with her.  McKay sees Bamber as a way to get attention, win or lose.

[Angelo222]

As certain Bamber supporters have openly claimed that Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent, we have made a direct approach to Mr McKay on Twitter this morning and asked him to confirm or deny his belief that Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

We are still waiting.

I wouldn't hold your breath admin.  Jackie Preece knows nothing about Simon McKay except what little he chooses to share with her.  McKay sees Bamber as a way to get attention, win or lose.

It would appear that he is getting slightly irritated with them if his tweet was anything to go by.  Things are on the turn by the looks of it.  I don't believe him having anything to do with Bambers case will do him any credit.  I for one am not surprised that he reuses to answer you admin.

[puglove]

McKay must rue the day he got involved with a mad woman like Preece. He should have done his homework. Won't do his credibility any good at all, and will doubtless come back to haunt him in the future.

[Tim Invictus]

Interesting twitter comments there John .... nice work.

Personally I think McKay was/is in a no lose situation. No one expects him to do much for Bamber so no harm done if the CCRC don't refer. Plus he got his name known and his mug on ITV.

If he does manage to get Bamber to the C.o.A. he is not only a miracle worker with his stock on the rise he also has a high profile case to continue to boost his career and a lot of money from legal aid to pay his salary and fund any other off the wall tests he wants to have done.

I think Hartley is spot ion though; Bamber will be dropped by McKay like a bad habit if the CCRC kick him out.

[puglove]

Nice to see Hartley back on form, running rings around the dullards. Not long to wait now for the good news. 

[puglove]

McKay must rue the day he got involved with a mad woman like Preece. He should have done his homework. Won't do his credibility any good at all, and will doubtless come back to haunt him in the future.

i tok jacie som tye sweet chilly pringuls becus of waht mr invinctus sed abowt the angul grynda but she showted at me to *shit off )  i think jereneremeremeremy has hd som bad newws

[Weety]

Interesting twitter comments there John .... nice work.

Personally I think McKay was/is in a no lose situation. No one expects him to do much for Bamber so no harm done if the CCRC don't refer. Plus he got his name known and his mug on ITV.

If he does manage to get Bamber to the C.o.A. he is not only a miracle worker with his stock on the rise he also has a high profile case to continue to boost his career and a lot of money from legal aid to pay his salary and fund any other off the wall tests he wants to have done.

I think Hartley is spot ion though; Bamber will be dropped by McKay like a bad habit if the CCRC kick him out.

I was surprised to see that Simon McKay is pretty much a one man band (well him and an assistant) to read his website you'd think McKay law was a large concern. There's only so much time such a small practice can give up free of charge - fee paying clients will take priority, I'm sure.

[Tim Invictus]

Interesting twitter comments there John .... nice work.

Personally I think McKay was/is in a no lose situation. No one expects him to do much for Bamber so no harm done if the CCRC don't refer. Plus he got his name known and his mug on ITV.

If he does manage to get Bamber to the C.o.A. he is not only a miracle worker with his stock on the rise he also has a high profile case to continue to boost his career and a lot of money from legal aid to pay his salary and fund any other off the wall tests he wants to have done.

I think Hartley is spot ion though; Bamber will be dropped by McKay like a bad habit if the CCRC kick him out.

I was surprised to see that Simon McKay is pretty much a one man band (well him and an assistant) to read his website you'd think McKay law was a large concern. There's only so much time such a small practice can give up free of charge - fee paying clients will take priority, I'm sure.

I bet a high profile legal aid funded case like Bamber's would be quite a catch for a one man and his dog operation .... perhaps that's why SiMac got involved. 

[Matthew Wyse]

Interesting twitter comments there John .... nice work.

Personally I think McKay was/is in a no lose situation. No one expects him to do much for Bamber so no harm done if the CCRC don't refer. Plus he got his name known and his mug on ITV.

If he does manage to get Bamber to the C.o.A. he is not only a miracle worker with his stock on the rise he also has a high profile case to continue to boost his career and a lot of money from legal aid to pay his salary and fund any other off the wall tests he wants to have done.

I think Hartley is spot ion though; Bamber will be dropped by McKay like a bad habit if the CCRC kick him out.

I was surprised to see that Simon McKay is pretty much a one man band (well him and an assistant) to read his website you'd think McKay law was a large concern. There's only so much time such a small practice can give up free of charge - fee paying clients will take priority, I'm sure.

  He is certainly trying to distance himself from the Bamber groupies from what I have read.  Writing on the wall???

[Admin]

Campaign team Bamber have tweeted today that the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) have advised Jeremy that they have lost his complaints as they were in electronic form and became corrupt.  Oh dear, we can feel yet another conspiracy theory gathering pace at Camp Bamber and Tesko Towers.   

[Weety]

Especially if they actually used the word "corrupt".