Anything and everything

[Redblossom]

All three places where credible sightings of Madeleine took place,
 
1)  The Rif Mountains (Zinat) in Morocco,
2)  seedy Molenbeek St Jean in Brussels and
3)  Leh in the high Himalayas in Indai

make their bread and butter caviar from drug trafficking and processing hemp.  A high percentage of peeps are involved involved in the "business"and will earn a decent crust.  The others mainly live as paupers.

Where drugs trafficking is concerned there will be gangsters



Anyone been to Morocco and visited such outlying places? .... I have, but not drug running places as far as I am aware.  Poverty abounds. 

Anyone been up in the Himalayas of India and tasted the life up there?  ..... My daughter has.  Once again not drug running places, I believe.  But poverty abounds there too

And Molenbeek is mainly inhabited by peeps from the Rif.  You can bet poverty, along with the gangster type peeps, is there, but quite a few will earn a decent crust

Criminals abound in places like that.  Peeps in such places learn very early on to keep their mouths shut, even to lie.  One doesn't kill the Goose that lays the golden egg.  One keeps to the "Company Rules" and does as one is told.

If bribery doesn't work and it almost certainly would in such poverty stricken places, then gangsters can use gangster methods to silence peeps.

They can persuade people to say what they demand

Just as tortured people can be forced to say things to avoid further torture....
......and in any case many/ most of the officials will already be corrupt, in such places




The Big Bosses are not going to have a ?billion /?trillion pound business ruinede because one person wants to tell the truth.



Sorry but in such places one cannot guarentee the truth

Irrelevant to my original post about the statements made from the belgian prosecutors office.....that the child was NOT madeleine, cheers

[Lyall]

Pretty offensive stuff, Sadie. You sure you don't work for a tabloid after all >@@(*&)

You should keep all the "the Belgium sighting was definitely Madeleine" self-indulgence to your own dedicated forums/groups.

[Kazcutt]

Irrelevant to my original post about the statements made from the belgian prosecutors office.....that the child was NOT madeleine, cheers

If it was Madeleine do you think we would have been told .? Is there still a reward for her


And the morroco photo was 100 percent madeleines head put on the he/she
I know I keep on but Madeleine and Bushra have cows licks in their hair only on different sides madeleines and piggy back photo are the same

[Redblossom]

If it was Madeleine do you think we would have been told .? Is there still a reward for her

why would the  belgium prosecutors office state it was not madeleine the girl on the cctv......just think about it.....

[Kazcutt]

why would the  belgium prosecutors office state it was not madeleine the girl on the cctv......just think about it.....

For her safety

[Redblossom]

For her safety

Right you are then.....safety from who?

[Kazcutt]

Right you are then.....safety from who?

You playing up

Ok the press say its Madeleine and her abductors kill her and hide her body Let's just say
That's just 1 reason we wouldn't be told imo

[Benice]

Suspended sentences, that's all. It's not like they murdered anyone is it?

Good grief  -  Please tell me you are not being serious? 

[AnneGuedes]

Suspended sentences, that's all. It's not like they murdered anyone is it?

Of course not and this is libel : Insp. Goncalo Amaral found guilty of perjury in the torture case of Leonor Cipriano and given a 1 1/2 year suspended sentence

[Benice]

Shocking isn't it?

I'm gobsmacked!  Whilst both serving policemen - one commits perjury to cover up torture and the other tortures a witness and because their prison sentences were suspended - that's considered to be no big deal?     I've heard it all now.

Can you imagine the reaction if Gerry McCann was found to have a ticket for speeding?   He would be crucified.

[Benice]

No.

Well you tell me what the name of the crime was for which he was given an 18 month suspended prison sentence.
It must have a name  - and whatever it was  - it involved his criminal behaviour regarding the torture of a woman in  his custody at the time.     That was proved in court - twice.

[sadie]

No.

I think you are in denial Anne

What would you call it then, if not perjury?  I would be happy to be corrected, but I dont think I am wrong.

[AnneGuedes]

I think you are in denial Anne

What would you call it then, if not perjury?  I would be happy to be corrected, but I dont think I am wrong.

I'm sorry, you are.

[John]

Wasn't Dr Amaral convicted of falsifying evidence to help cover up for three of his officers who were accused of torture.  He was also cleared of another charge of failing to report a crime.

Outside court Dr Amaral told Portuguese reporters he was not surprised by the verdict and hinted that he would appeal.  He said: 'I wasn't surprised, I was expecting to be convicted. There is a lot of political pressure on the case.
'We trust in justice and this does not end here.'  Asked if he felt like a scapegoat, he said: 'Throughout my life I have been a scapegoat for many things. I don't know about this.'

Read more...

[sadie]

I'm sorry, you are.

Well you have made the claim.  Would you like to prove it please

Thanks, sadie