A new member's perception - but are these points true or false?

[j.rob]

"Several times, the McCann couple said that the attention of the police should be maintained focussing on the abduction hypothesis, which, in the couple's opinion, was the only scenario that occurred and that the police should not forget to continue to investigate the suspect Robert Murat."

So the McCanns get to lead the police investigation, do they?


"More recently, and even before Kate's interrogation, during a telephone call between Gerald McCann and the undersigned, he made a reference regarding the investigation, that he was certain that the police did not have any proof that could incriminate them with regard to the death of Madeleine McCann and he said that the police were wasting their time in directing the investigation around the parents."

Her death? He is supposed to have thought that she is still 'out there' - hence all the mystics and sightings.

[Mr Gray]

I'm a bit confused about why you always bring up translation regarding slightly negative comments about the McCanns. I mean the european Parliament / United Nations etc rely on translators every day and they discuss areas of much more complexity.

N

Nothing to get confused about..UN use top class translators PJ didn't. in her book Kate tells how her statements were read back to her in English having been translated  to Portuguese and how many mistakes there were. Then you have unofficial translations on the McCann files.. the McCann were never asked to prove their innocence in the archiving report..it was a bad translation

[j.rob]

We may find out. If they answer!

Are you being serious? Anyone that does not believe the abduction theory is called a liar. They are mighty busy silencing people who don't believe their version of events.

[AnneGuedes]

Hi!  I've not read much about this have they accused people of lying?

For instance, they said that Madeleine didn't cry on the 1st May. They were at the Tapas... however they said that Mrs Fenn, who heard a child crying and calling Daddy for 75 minutes, was wrong.

[Aiofe]

"Several times, the McCann couple said that the attention of the police should be maintained focussing on the abduction hypothesis, which, in the couple's opinion, was the only scenario that occurred and that the police should not forget to continue to investigate the suspect Robert Murat."

So the McCanns get to lead the police investigation, do they?


"More recently, and even before Kate's interrogation, during a telephone call between Gerald McCann and the undersigned, he made a reference regarding the investigation, that he was certain that the police did not have any proof that could incriminate them with regard to the death of Madeleine McCann and he said that the police were wasting their time in directing the investigation around the parents."

Her death? He is supposed to have thought that she is still 'out there' - hence all the mystics and sightings.

That seems to be a statement by the police bound by their belief that she was dead. At the time the McCanns were very insistent that she was alive.

This is how myths start- Police ideas and words put into Gerry's mouth.

[Aiofe]

For instance, they said that Madeleine didn't cry on the 1st May. They were at the Tapas... however they said that Mrs Fenn, who heard a child crying and calling Daddy for 75 minutes, was wrong.

And how is that a lie?

[Aiofe]

Are you being serious? Anyone that does not believe the abduction theory is called a liar. They are mighty busy silencing people who don't believe their version of events.

We are talking here of the Mccanns themselves.

[j.rob]

Using money from the fund to silence critics. It's all documented. Carter Ruck are mighty busy.

[Aiofe]

Hi! Yes they have!

N

References please (my turn).

[Aiofe]

Using money from the fund to silence critics. It's all documented. Carter Ruck are mighty busy.

What are you talking about?

[Aiofe]

Are you being serious? Anyone that does not believe the abduction theory is called a liar. They are mighty busy silencing people who don't believe their version of events.

They have made limited attacks on people who have defamed them and proved that in court. That is not 'calling people liars', it is demanding that they prove they were telling the truth. Neither the Express Group not Bennett were able to do so and hence were found to have defamed them illegally.

[AnneGuedes]

Nothing to get confused about..UN use top class translators PJ didn't. in her book Kate tells how her statements were read back to her in English having been translated  to Portuguese and how many mistakes there were. Then you have unofficial translations on the McCann files.. the McCann were never asked to prove their innocence in the archiving report..it was a bad translation

You're spreading a myth suggested by Mrs McCann ! Don't you think that after 5 years she had time to rectify those mysterious "mistakes" in a translation she signed ?
Translating isn't just substituting a word in language A to a word with the same meaning in  language B, even the very insufficient Google translator does better than that.

[j.rob]

Carter Ruck, the lawyers who work for the McCanns to shut up anyone who doesn't believe their theory.  You know perfectly well what I am talking about.

All these expensive professionals they are using to manage their reputations and silence their critics. It all costs money - where does the money come from?

The fund that is supposed to be looking for Madeleine.

[AnneGuedes]

They have made limited attacks on people who have defamed them and proved that in court. That is not 'calling people liars', it is demanding that they prove they were telling the truth. Neither the Express Group not Bennett were able to do so and hence were found to have defamed them illegally.

The Express Group was proved in Court to have libelled them ?

[BigFatBlonde]

They have made limited attacks on people who have defamed them and proved that in court. That is not 'calling people liars', it is demanding that they prove they were telling the truth. Neither the Express Group not Bennett were able to do so and hence were found to have defamed them illegally.

So if they lose against amaral is he telling the truth in his book?

N