Has support for Amaral and the Mccanns reached devotion by their supporters ?

[sadie]

Other than pointing out that he is an ex-policeman, I shan't indulge you.

Ah, this is getting interesting 

Nobody will say that Amaral is a decent , honest good policeman


Wonder if John has answered that question yet?

[jassi]

maybe a  little bit obesssed with them even??

Yes, I find obsession difficult to understand unless on is a relative or close friend. I find the case fascinating , but not to the extent that some seem to.  Somebody yesterday talked about reading the files for six and a half years ! Do they not have a life ?

[stephen25000]

Stephen..debate is about posing and answering questions..you are just not very good at it..everyone can see..even the [ censored word] must be cringing at your antics

I put up this thread to display exactly how some people behave in context of their viewpoint in this case.

You have amply displayed that in your responses, and earlier in your support
 of .....2.

[carlymichelle]

I put up this thread to display exactly how some people behave in context of their viewpoint in this case.

You have amply displayed that in your responses, and earlier in your support
 of .....2.

i hope you dont think     im a devoteee lol i dont know the manns OR GA    I  have always been on maddies side she is the victim  of this whole case not  the  adults who were mature enough to make their own bad choices

[stephen25000]

Ah, this is getting interesting 

Nobody will say that Amaral is a decent , honest good policeman


Wonder if John has answered that question yet?

Well sadie, can you say the mccanns are decent honourable people for placing their children in danger ?


Ultimately, this is where the case starts and finishes.

[Aiofe]

Yes, I find obsession difficult to understand unless on is a relative or close friend. I find the case fascinating , but not to the extent that some seem to.  Somebody yesterday talked about reading the files for six and a half years ! Do they not have a life ?

It must be remembered that to an anti, someone who has read the files for six years is a saint if they identify as an anti, and a fool if they identify as a pro.

And to a pro, someone who has read the files for six years is a saint if they identify as a pro and a fool if they identify as an anti.

Hypocrisy on both sides.

[Aiofe]

Well sadie, can you say the mccanns are decent honourable people for placing their children in danger ?


Ultimately, this is where the case starts and finishes.

I can say they are decent honourable people who also placed their children foolishly at risk. Decent honourable people do stupid things.

[Aiofe]

i hope you dont think     im a devoteee lol i dont know the manns OR GA    I  have always been on maddies side she is the victim  of this whole case not  the  adults who were mature enough to make their own bad choices

I assume you have never made a bad choice in your life. Motes and beams!

[stephen25000]

i hope you dont think     im a devoteee lol i dont know the manns OR GA    I  have always been on maddies side she is the victim  of this whole case not  the  adults who were mature enough to make their own bad choices

No Carly.

You are quite right, the only victim all along has been Madeleine, not the mccanns.

Neither was it amaral who left 3 very young children by themselves and unprotected.

[carlymichelle]

No Carly.

You are quite right, the only victim all along has been Madeleine, not the mccanns.

Neither was it amaral who left 3 very young children by themselves and unprotected.

exactly by adults i meant the mcanns and  their friends

[Aiofe]

No Carly.

You are quite right, the only victim all along has been Madeleine, not the mccanns.

Neither was it amaral who left 3 very young children by themselves and unprotected.

And nor was it the bad decision to leave them alone the Prime cause for Madeleine's absence.

[jassi]

It must be remembered that to an anti, someone who has read the files for six years is a saint if they identify as an anti, and a fool if they identify as a pro.

And to a pro, someone who has read the files for six years is a saint if they identify as a pro and a fool if they identify as an anti.

Hypocrisy on both sides.

Indeed. I just can't understand that degree of obsession if someone is not personally involved, though I suppose you get people who are just as obsessed with celebrities and their activities.

[sadie]

No Carly.

You are quite right, the only victim all along has been Madeleine, not the mccanns.

Neither was it amaral who left 3 very young children by themselves and unprotected.

But he used to drive around drunk with his daughter in the car. 
And you can bet that he didn't take take her with him when on duty.  She quite probably was left in the car or at home (on her own?)

[stephen25000]

But he used to drive around drunk with his daughter in the car. 
And you can bet that he didn't take take her with him when on duty.  She quite probably was left in the car or at home (on her own?)

sadie, this case is not about amaral, it is about what the mccanns failed to do.

Try to remember that.

[Mr Gray]

sadie, this case is not about amaral, it is about what the mccanns failed to do.

Try to remember that.

 Try  to remember your thread is about amaral