Has support for Amaral and the Mccanns reached devotion by their supporters ?

[carlymichelle]

Having read through some of the comments on the site you 'recommended', your above post makes no sense at all.

Likewise having seen some of the material on the official facebook page, it has increasing hallmarks of an almost religious devotion.

exactly   if   you  break from the flock  you are a black sheep IE we dont believe everything     the mcanns say so we are considered trolls etc and [ censored word ]s same kinda  thing right?

[Mr Gray]

Having read through some of the comments on the site you 'recommended', your above post makes no sense at all.

Likewise having seen some of the material on the official facebook page, it has increasing hallmarks of an almost religious devotion.

 Your devotion to blaming the MCCanns is clouding your judgement. In my opinion you are displaying devotional behaviour

[stephen25000]

that wasn't the question, I asked do you support amaral

Define support.

I have stated before, he is a bit player in this case, but clearly has become the focal point of the obsessed mccann followers hatred.

[Mr Gray]

Define support.

I have stated before, he is a bit player in this case, but clearly has become the focal point of the obsessed mccann followers hatred.

 Do you think he is a decent , honest good policeman

[stephen25000]

Do you think he is a decent , honest good policeman

Do you think the mccanns are decent, good and honest people who cared so much for their children, they left them unprotected whilst out drinking with their associates ?

[Aiofe]

Do you think the mccanns are decent, good and honest people who cared so much for their children, they left them unprotected whilst out drinking with their associates ?

I think that the McCanns are ordinary people with no proof of their criminality. I think they erred in their childcare and have suffered terribly. Unless the unthinkable happened and they actively harmed her, but there is no evidence that this happened.

[Mr Gray]

Do you think the mccanns are decent, good and honest people who cared so much for their children, they left them unprotected whilst out drinking with their associates ?

I think the McCanns are decent good honest people who cared for their children .. why are you running away from answering my question re amaral

[sadie]

Define support.

I have stated before, he is a bit player in this case, but clearly has become the focal point of the obsessed mccann followers hatred.

BIT PLAYER?

Well he darned well shouldn't have been.

He led the damned case. He carries the can.

[sadie]

Do you think he is a decent , honest good policeman

Me too.

I would like to know if, you, Stephen believe Amaral to be a decent, good, honest policeman

[Mr Gray]

Me too.

I would like to know if, you, Stephen believe Amaral to be a decent, good, honest policeman

 Stephen has been avoiding the question all day

[Lyall]

BIT PLAYER?

Well he darned well shouldn't have been.

He led the damned case. He carries the can.

Carries the can?

Think about what you're saying. Who is responsible for this situation?

[Lyall]

Stephen has been avoiding the question all day

Don't blame him.

[sadie]

Carries the can?

Think about what you're saying. Who is responsible for this situation?

Perhaps you have never been in a senior position?

Didn't you know that the Head Honcho always ultimately carries the can?  He is responsible and answerable for everything.

Amaral was the Haed Honcho in the Madeleine case .... and according to an article I found a couple of days ago (soz have forgotten where it was, so you will have to believe me) he was also Head Honcho on the Joana Cipriano case.



He is answerable for everything.  He should not sidestep the responsibility.

[Benita]

Don't blame him.

I don't blame him either ...because its quite obvious ..hes not 

[Lyall]

Perhaps you have never been in a senior position?

Didn't you know that the Head Honcho always ultimately carries the can?  He is responsible and answerable for everything.

Amaral was the Haed Honcho in the Madeleine case .... and according to an article I found a couple of days ago (soz have forgotten where it was, so you will have to believe me) he was also Head Honcho on the Joana Cipriano case.



He is answerable for everything.  He should not sidestep the responsibility.

But there are others even more responsible.

Legal action was taken against him because of the book, not the investigation. You ought to take note of that.