Jeremy Bamber - The Aga cooker and its relevance to the burn marks on Nevill

[Dillon]

Nice one Shona. My understanding is that the shots were closely grouped and only one missed. There is no way on earth that Sheila could have done this. I have heard that Bamber was only good at two things when he was at his public school, Greshams. Lying and shooting.
Bamber's few remaining supporters need to get real and to look at the fundamentals of the evidence in this case objectively . All this prattling on about burn marks etc is irrelevant . He has had a very good run for his money with endless reconsideration of his case and is as guilty as hell.

[puglove]

Nice one Shona. My understanding is that the shots were closely grouped and only one missed. There is no way on earth that Sheila could have done this. I have heard that Bamber was only good at two things when he was at his public school, Greshams. Lying and shooting.
Bamber's few remaining supporters need to get real and to look at the fundamentals of the evidence in this case objectively . All this prattling on about burn marks etc is irrelevant . He has had a very good run for his money with endless reconsideration of his case and is as guilty as hell.

Bamber's only had such a good run for his money because a handful of frustrated women (blimey, Lugg, you really do get everywhere, don't you? Have you ever thought of applying to B and Q? Truce Schmuce) think that he's hot. If he looked like poor Michael Stone, who DOES appear to be innocent, Bamber wouldn't get a look-in. And, yes. Bamber is as guilty as hell. That's why, after 27 years and loads of fuss, he's still in the nick.

[John]

I read an interesting comment recently made by someone on the blue forum complaining about all of us who believe Jerry to be guilty?   

Seemingly there is no point in what we do as Jerry has been found guilty.  Don't they realise that its more to do with countering their noxious propaganda than it is proving guilt all over again.  That said, we are perfectly entitled to challenge their views and in doing so repeat the known facts and the evidence.

It must be frustrating for them (poor dears) to be challenged on every single argument every single day of the week.