I think for some that is the concern. The dog is supposed to react when it smells cadaver not when it is commanded to react. Possibly this isn't what you meant to imply but it is certainly a possibility in this case as in the Thomas Quirk case, don't you agree? I'm not suggesting it was a deliberate command by the way but that the handler may, owing to a strong belief in the guilt of the parties being examined, have miscued the dog unconsciously. This is a phenomenon that has been officially observed in test situations on sniffer dogs by the way.
Why are you assuming the dog was 'wrong' ? ( for whatever reason )
I mean, Madeleine McCann disappeared without trace and was last seen alive ( seven years ago ) in the very apartment where the cadaver dog barked his alert
On what basis do you assume there must be some reason,
OTHER than because he detected the scent of the missing child's dead body, for the dog alerting ?
Do you accept that the dog may have alerted for no other reason than he
DID detect the scent of the missing child's dead body ?