Author Topic: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.  (Read 312128 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #465 on: June 15, 2014, 09:32:38 AM »
they did

That's your  belief and no more.

Yet to be tested in court.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #466 on: June 15, 2014, 09:34:22 AM »
That's your  belief and no more.

Yet to be tested in court.

just like its your belief..no more
« Last Edit: June 17, 2014, 01:40:23 AM by John »

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #467 on: June 21, 2014, 02:40:32 PM »
There just is no excuse for failing to cooperate with the official investigation not to mention thereafter failing to participate in a reconstruction along with the other seven protagonists.  From what I have seen of this case the only person who made any real effort to find Madeleine was Gonçalo Amaral and we all know where that got him. hmm...

« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 08:15:06 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #468 on: June 21, 2014, 02:48:32 PM »
There just is no excuse for failing to cooperate with the official investigation not to mention thereafter failing to participate in a reconstruction along with the other seven protagonists.  From what I have seen of this case the only person who made any real effort to find Madeleine was Gonçalo Amaral and we all know where that got him. hmm...



Nicely put.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 08:15:32 PM by John »

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #469 on: June 21, 2014, 02:51:09 PM »
Nicely put.

...and I did it without swearing once!

ETA  Thanks to Anne Guedes' reporting from the trial they could read everything which was said in court in any event.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 02:53:38 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #470 on: June 21, 2014, 02:52:39 PM »
...and I did it without swearing once!


It can be done. 8(0(*

Offline Eleanor

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #471 on: June 21, 2014, 03:15:16 PM »
There just is no excuse for failing to cooperate with the official investigation not to mention thereafter failing to participate in a reconstruction along with the other seven protagonists.  From what I have seen of this case the only person who made any real effort to find Madeleine was Gonçalo Amaral and we all know where that got him. hmm...


As for The Reconstruction.  Neither of them refused to attend The Reconstruction.  Neither of them were guilty  of anything illegal.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 08:18:26 PM by John »

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #472 on: June 21, 2014, 04:28:14 PM »

they were absolutely right not to attend the reconstruction

So you admit it was a conscious decision?  8@??)(
« Last Edit: June 21, 2014, 08:08:25 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #473 on: June 21, 2014, 04:30:15 PM »
So you admit it was a conscious decision?  8@??)(

how should I know...

Offline John

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #474 on: June 21, 2014, 08:12:19 PM »
how should I know...

You stated that they were right not to attend the reconstruction.  I was under the impression they agreed to attend but because the rest of the group had reneged there was no point?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #475 on: June 21, 2014, 08:44:28 PM »
You stated that they were right not to attend the reconstruction.  I was under the impression they agreed to attend but because the rest of the group had reneged there was no point?

the recon was cancelled because the other tapas members did not want to attend..and I don't blame them in the slightest

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #476 on: June 21, 2014, 08:46:09 PM »
the recon was cancelled because the other tapas members did not want to attend..and I don't blame them in the slightest

i.e. They did not wish to implicate themselves and get caught out with contradictory statements

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #477 on: June 21, 2014, 08:48:09 PM »
i.e. They did not wish to implicate themselves and get caught out with contradictory statements

even innocent people can implicate themselves with contradictory statements..thats why they have a legal right to silence

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #478 on: June 21, 2014, 09:07:14 PM »
even innocent people can implicate themselves with contradictory statements..thats why they have a legal right to silence

Can you cite examples of that , rather then a well worn cliche ?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.
« Reply #479 on: June 21, 2014, 09:25:27 PM »
They refused to go back for a reconstruction because Gerry said it wouldn't be 'helpful'- however  they did one in the UK for TV.  All scripted of course!

SY can only work with the information they are given- if the information is wrong.. or lies are being told then...
they will come up with the  wrong answer!

From Joana Morias

Quote

«Portuguese Journalist: A reconstruction. If you volunteer to do a reconstruction wouldn't that open the case?

Gerry McCann: We want to create information that will lead us to us helping find Madeleine.

Portuguese Journalist: That will help Madeleine. Don't you think so?

Gerry McCann: Well if it does then, you know, we will participate.

Portuguese Journalist: You are in Lisbon. You could take that step today. Ask for the case to be reopened and do a reconstruction with your friends.

Gerry McCann: We are going round in circles. We would be more than happy for the case to be reopened.»unquote


Excerpt from: Exclusive Video: McCanns Press Conference, February 12, 2010
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin