Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories  (Read 251137 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #660 on: January 17, 2013, 02:23:51 AM »
It's a bit of a shame that I'm banned from the blue, because I'd love to put this to susan (5000 thousand, fantastically insightful posts and counting) but there you go. We fight our battles, with truth on our side, and they stick their fingers in a banana. Sums up Bamber's cause, really. 20 years down the line, they'll still be saying that he was once too good looking to be a mass murderer.  But "that is what they'll have to prove."Ho ho!!

It's all psychology Shona. That's why his supporters always post a 27-year-old photo of him when they are trying to impress the public.  I'm afraid a photo of a bloated 52-year-old just wouldn't get the same reaction...poor boy!   @)(++(*
« Last Edit: January 17, 2013, 02:26:56 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #661 on: January 17, 2013, 02:30:12 AM »
Hope this is within the realm of the "truce".....Lookout. You reckon that it was a "cat fight, pure and simple." So....June and Sheila fought and shot each other. I'm giving you a let-out clause, here. How the f..k did that happen? Have you thought this through? Or are you just an angry old woman from Wallesey? With the hots for Mike? Hmmm?

Had there been an altercation with Sheila, cat fight or otherwise, then Sheila's nightie would have suffered damage and/or had blood staining on it.  Yet again...no evidence...no case to answer.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #662 on: January 17, 2013, 02:31:29 AM »
Hope this is within the realm of the "truce".....Lookout. You reckon that it was a "cat fight, pure and simple." So....June and Sheila fought and shot each other. I'm giving you a let-out clause, here. How the f..k did that happen? Have you thought this through? Or are you just an angry old woman from Wallesey? With the hots for Mike? Hmmm?

And Jeremy. A distraught, lost orphan. Demolished. He loved his dad.

So, why did he have everything valued? 3 days after the tragedy?

Why did he try to sell pictures of Sheila?

So, Mike. We've battled. Apparently, you've got an image of Sheila on the bed, and the phone log. I'm calling you out. You haven't got either. You are full of shit. Bring it on. Be real, for once.

He's a liar Shona, pure and simple!   8@??)(
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #663 on: January 17, 2013, 06:16:27 AM »
All I can say is Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent after everything he has seen and he obviously didn't have long enough to prepare what he would have liked for the CCRC.
Ngb has already said there will be a new application to the CCRC.
Mark Williams Thomas also believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent and I think he has a few more 'police connections' than Simon Jones.
He did a first class job highlighting the Saville case and his profile will be higher than ever now.
I believe there will be a full length documentary which could hopefully show a FULL reconstruction of events that night.
I believe if Simon McKay gets his way and gets the majority of the PII evidence released and a new documentary is released and the general public start to question how safe this conviction is we will get a clear picture of what happened that night.
There needs to be an open and transparent closure to this case one way or another

Offline goatboy

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #664 on: January 17, 2013, 08:01:00 AM »
Sorry Jackie, but I don't recall McKay ever clearly stating he believes Jeremy to be innocent. He has only ever said he thinks the conviction is unsafe which is not the same thing. He refused to answer a tweet asking him to confirm that he thought Jeremy innocent. Says it all IMO.

Offline puglove

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #665 on: January 17, 2013, 08:04:21 AM »
All I can say is Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent after everything he has seen and he obviously didn't have long enough to prepare what he would have liked for the CCRC.
Ngb has already said there will be a new application to the CCRC.
Mark Williams Thomas also believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent and I think he has a few more 'police connections' than Simon Jones.
He did a first class job highlighting the Saville case and his profile will be higher than ever now.
I believe there will be a full length documentary which could hopefully show a FULL reconstruction of events that night.
I believe if Simon McKay gets his way and gets the majority of the PII evidence released and a new documentary is released and the general public start to question how safe this conviction is we will get a clear picture of what happened that night.
There needs to be an open and transparent closure to this case one way or another

Morning, Jac!! I couldn't agree more, there does indeed need to be a transparent representation of this case, once and for all, instead of all the bullshit. Fancy Sheila running round the house, barking like a dog!! Who knew!! And fancy blowing Bamber's last chance with the CCRC with an unfinished, ill-prepared pile of old tosh.    8)><(


 @)(++(*      Catch you later!!   xx
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #666 on: January 17, 2013, 10:40:25 AM »
All I can say is Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent after everything he has seen and he obviously didn't have long enough to prepare what he would have liked for the CCRC.
Ngb has already said there will be a new application to the CCRC.
Mark Williams Thomas also believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent and I think he has a few more 'police connections' than Simon Jones.
He did a first class job highlighting the Saville case and his profile will be higher than ever now.
I believe there will be a full length documentary which could hopefully show a FULL reconstruction of events that night.
I believe if Simon McKay gets his way and gets the majority of the PII evidence released and a new documentary is released and the general public start to question how safe this conviction is we will get a clear picture of what happened that night.
There needs to be an open and transparent closure to this case one way or another

We all know what happened at White House Farm that morning and nothing Simon McKay, Mark Williams-Thomas or anyone else for that matter can do will ever change that no matter what wishful thinking a handful of deluded women believe.  As far as a new application to the CCRC is concerned that's a no brainer. McKay will want to stay involved beacause it is all good publicity and let's face it he needs all he can get these days.   @)(++(*
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Padgates staff

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #667 on: January 17, 2013, 12:05:55 PM »
What is it with cases like this that they get a new team and they don't achieve much? Is it that some 'hotshot' thinks they can solve it then realises it's like flogging a dead horse and leaves?

Offline Angelo222

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #668 on: January 17, 2013, 12:12:55 PM »
What is it with cases like this that they get a new team and they don't achieve much? Is it that some 'hotshot' thinks they can solve it then realises it's like flogging a dead horse and leaves?

Reminds me of a Tesco burger....all dead horse and leaves.   @)(++(*
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline insider

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #669 on: January 17, 2013, 03:25:18 PM »
All I can say is Simon McKay believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent after everything he has seen and he obviously didn't have long enough to prepare what he would have liked for the CCRC.
Ngb has already said there will be a new application to the CCRC.
Mark Williams Thomas also believes Jeremy Bamber to be innocent and I think he has a few more 'police connections' than Simon Jones.
He did a first class job highlighting the Saville case and his profile will be higher than ever now.
I believe there will be a full length documentary which could hopefully show a FULL reconstruction of events that night.
I believe if Simon McKay gets his way and gets the majority of the PII evidence released and a new documentary is released and the general public start to question how safe this conviction is we will get a clear picture of what happened that night.
There needs to be an open and transparent closure to this case one way or another

Both of them may be saying that he is innocent privately but they won't say so publicly in case it comes back  to bite them on the bum.   8)--))

The difference between Simon Jones and MWT is that the former knows more coppers and has many more associates in the Ipswich and Colchester areas.
Liars come in all shapes and sizes. No profession is without them.

Offline sika

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #670 on: January 17, 2013, 07:47:01 PM »
Strange how a crazy, frantic Sheila, with her meds failing her, in a world of her own, never wasted a single bullet into a wall, or a window, or the ceiling...but managed to get out of bed, forensically shoot the boys, shoot Ralph, shoot June (then come back to her), stand above Ralph in the kitchen and batter his face without a single spot of backspatter on her nightie, then lie down on the far side of the bed ( why not with the boys?) and shoot herself. And miss. And shoot hereslf again. No wonder that the CCRC has put this to bed. You'd have to be seven kinds of stupid to believe that scenario.
I sense that I'm not the only one who finds the pro Bambers inability to get a grip on reality, very frustrating.
How bloody stupid are these people?

Offline starryian

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #671 on: April 19, 2013, 05:18:17 AM »
Tesko has tried to rally flagging support for his lost cause. On the deluded forum he writes;

'I know lots of things I have been banging on (as you put it for years), that I have been banging on about for years, have you ever owned a forum, and have you got any idea how to try and keep everyone interested, or how to motivate members or other people to contribute to a debate?'
Unquote...

Mike we know how you try to keep people 'interested'. You just make up another crackpot theory or fairytale to keep the Bamberettes smug and happy and give yourself and the sychopthantic, bovine excrement spreaders something more to write about.
 @)(++(*
Starryian..

Offline Outlook

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #672 on: April 19, 2013, 01:05:51 PM »
Tesko has tried to rally flagging support for his lost cause. On the deluded forum he writes;

'I know lots of things I have been banging on (as you put it for years), that I have been banging on about for years, have you ever owned a forum, and have you got any idea how to try and keep everyone interested, or how to motivate members or other people to contribute to a debate?'
Unquote...

Mike we know how you try to keep people 'interested'. You just make up another crackpot theory or fairytale to keep the Bamberettes smug and happy and give yourself and the sychopthantic, bovine excrement spreaders something more to write about.
 @)(++(*
Of course the best way to run a forum is to start a nonsensical rambling fantasy thread that runs for the best part of a 1000 posts and makes as much sense as a Korean Soap Opera and you don't allow anyone else to post!

Then you accuse all your members of being lying s..mbags and paedophiles especially anyone who does not worship you.  It always helps to have a couple of deranged supporters who set up lots of socket-puppet accounts and post endless fantasies about how they would have done things.  You then fantasize of finding long dead murder victims which churns the stomachs of even your closest supporters and then gaze at clouds and trees for guidance and generally make yourself a complete laughing stock so that people delete their browser cache rather than run the risk of clicking on your forum accidentally.

It is very difficult to run such a forum so badly and I commend Mike for doing more to keep Jeremy locked up for life than an army of lawyers.  In the remote circumstance that he is innocent you could not convince anyone now after 20,000 posts of bile, hatred and lies.  He could not have done better if he had beaten JB to death with a shovel ten years ago.

Well done Mike 8((()*/ 8((()*/ 8((()*/  You are the man that finally nailed JBs coffin shut.

Offline tonyb

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #673 on: April 19, 2013, 09:09:59 PM »
Tesko has tried to rally flagging support for his lost cause. On the deluded forum he writes;

'I know lots of things I have been banging on (as you put it for years), that I have been banging on about for years, have you ever owned a forum, and have you got any idea how to try and keep everyone interested, or how to motivate members or other people to contribute to a debate?'
Unquote...

Mike we know how you try to keep people 'interested'. You just make up another crackpot theory or fairytale to keep the Bamberettes smug and happy and give yourself and the sychopthantic, bovine excrement spreaders something more to write about.
 @)(++(*
Of course the best way to run a forum is to start a nonsensical rambling fantasy thread that runs for the best part of a 1000 posts and makes as much sense as a Korean Soap Opera and you don't allow anyone else to post!

Then you accuse all your members of being lying s..mbags and paedophiles especially anyone who does not worship you.  It always helps to have a couple of deranged supporters who set up lots of socket-puppet accounts and post endless fantasies about how they would have done things.  You then fantasize of finding long dead murder victims which churns the stomachs of even your closest supporters and then gaze at clouds and trees for guidance and generally make yourself a complete laughing stock so that people delete their browser cache rather than run the risk of clicking on your forum accidentally.

It is very difficult to run such a forum so badly and I commend Mike for doing more to keep Jeremy locked up for life than an army of lawyers.  In the remote circumstance that he is innocent you could not convince anyone now after 20,000 posts of bile, hatred and lies.  He could not have done better if he had beaten JB to death with a shovel ten years ago.

Well done Mike 8((()*/ 8((()*/ 8((()*/  You are the man that finally nailed JBs coffin shut.



Spot on. I came to the Blue strongly believing innocence. The way MT subsequently unveiled his theories and his unswerving belief in himself even in the face of obvious errors in his "research & proof" It took a few years but Mike finally convinced me of JBs guilt. I mean,the blokes barking mad 8-)(--)

Offline puglove

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #674 on: April 19, 2013, 10:20:18 PM »
Tesko has tried to rally flagging support for his lost cause. On the deluded forum he writes;

'I know lots of things I have been banging on (as you put it for years), that I have been banging on about for years, have you ever owned a forum, and have you got any idea how to try and keep everyone interested, or how to motivate members or other people to contribute to a debate?'
Unquote...

Mike we know how you try to keep people 'interested'. You just make up another crackpot theory or fairytale to keep the Bamberettes smug and happy and give yourself and the sychopthantic, bovine excrement spreaders something more to write about.
 @)(++(*
Of course the best way to run a forum is to start a nonsensical rambling fantasy thread that runs for the best part of a 1000 posts and makes as much sense as a Korean Soap Opera and you don't allow anyone else to post!

Then you accuse all your members of being lying s..mbags and paedophiles especially anyone who does not worship you.  It always helps to have a couple of deranged supporters who set up lots of socket-puppet accounts and post endless fantasies about how they would have done things.  You then fantasize of finding long dead murder victims which churns the stomachs of even your closest supporters and then gaze at clouds and trees for guidance and generally make yourself a complete laughing stock so that people delete their browser cache rather than run the risk of clicking on your forum accidentally.

It is very difficult to run such a forum so badly and I commend Mike for doing more to keep Jeremy locked up for life than an army of lawyers.  In the remote circumstance that he is innocent you could not convince anyone now after 20,000 posts of bile, hatred and lies.  He could not have done better if he had beaten JB to death with a shovel ten years ago.

Well done Mike 8((()*/ 8((()*/ 8((()*/  You are the man that finally nailed JBs coffin shut.



Spot on. I came to the Blue strongly believing innocence. The way MT subsequently unveiled his theories and his unswerving belief in himself even in the face of obvious errors in his "research & proof" It took a few years but Mike finally convinced me of JBs guilt. I mean,the blokes barking mad 8-)(--)

The Last Days Of Rome starring Tiberius Tesko.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.